Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Ream review

Free#12 of 15 in Collaborative Research Writing Tools Software

A free web editor for collaborative LaTeX writing, with AI assistance billed separately by Anthropic.

6.9/10Editor score
Ream6.9 Visit Ream

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Ream is a web-based LaTeX editor for researchers and academic writers who want to work together in a shared document. It combines real-time collaboration with contextual comments, so feedback can stay close to the relevant text. The editor compiles with PDF LaTeX, XeTeX, or LuaTeX, and includes project-wide search and customizable themes. Solo writers can also use it, but its coauthoring tools make it particularly relevant to small research teams.

Project continuity is a practical strength: writers can start a project in Ream or import source files from Overleaf and arXiv. Version history includes change tracking and the ability to revert to earlier versions, which supports review and recovery as a draft evolves. This gives teams a route to collaborate without giving up a record of changes. The product is web-based and cloud-deployed, with community and email support channels. Its feature set centers on editing and collaboration; teams that need verified citation tooling should consider an alternative with that capability.

The published description presents Ream as free, and the homepage invites users to try it for free. Access is also described through an early-access waitlist or user invitation, so teams should account for that onboarding route. The AI assistant can generate and edit LaTeX and answer questions, but it requires the user's Anthropic API key and Anthropic charges according to usage. That means the editor can be a fit for free teams comfortable managing those separate AI costs, while teams seeking bundled AI pricing or broader research-writing functions may prefer another option.

Ream pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Real-time coauthoring with contextual comments and feedback
    • Version history includes change tracking and reverting
    • Imports Overleaf and arXiv source projects
  • Where it doesn't
    • AI assistant requires an Anthropic API key and incurs usage charges
    • Access may require an early-access waitlist or invitation
    • No verified citation tooling

Ream fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update