Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

PointCheck review

Free#111 of 129 in Website Accessibility ToolsAccessibility Testing Software

A visual, interaction-focused accessibility audit tool with evidence-rich reporting.

3.0/10Editor score
PointCheck3.0 Visit PointCheck

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

PointCheck is a web-based accessibility testing tool for teams evaluating public websites against WCAG 2.1 and WCAG 2.2 Level AA criteria. Users enter a URL, choose the tests to run, and receive results from a headless browser, DOM analysis, and vision-language models. It is a strong fit for teams that need visual and interaction-focused checks across public web pages, especially when evidence and criterion-level reporting matter.

Its standout capability is the breadth of checks around how a page behaves and appears. PointCheck can perform keyboard navigation with real Tab traversal, verify visible focus indicators using vision models, inspect page structure and semantics, analyze color and contrast with Deuteranopia simulation, and test 200% zoom and reflow. It also checks form error handling through invalid submissions. Live results, visual evidence, executive summaries, and downloadable PDF reports make the output useful for documenting findings and sharing them beyond the immediate audit workflow.

PointCheck is most appropriate when a team wants automated scans centered on public URLs and a clear record of what each criterion found. The published product details also identify it as open source and AI-enabled. However, its scope has boundaries: it is a web-focused tool, and the vendor states that it is not a replacement for manual audits. Teams that need broader assessment coverage beyond automated public-page checks should pair it with manual review or choose an alternative built for that workflow. PointCheck suits visual QA, keyboard-path checks, and evidence-led reporting; it is less suitable as a complete accessibility program on its own.

PointCheck pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Tests real Tab traversal and verifies focus visibility with vision models
    • Covers contrast, zoom, reflow, semantics, and form error handling
    • Provides per-criterion findings, visual evidence, and downloadable PDF reports
  • Where it doesn't
    • Focused on public websites and web-based testing
    • Does not replace manual accessibility audits
    • Pricing and plan structure are not part of the published product details

PointCheck fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update