Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

PaperDesk review

Free#12 of 32 in Manuscript Submission Software

Free web-based conference software for submission, blind review and proceedings workflows.

8.1/10Editor score
PaperDesk8.1 Visit PaperDesk

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

PaperDesk is a web-based academic conference management system associated with NED University of Engineering and Technology’s Department of Computer Science and Information Technology. It is intended for conference organizers and research participants, with workflows for submitting manuscripts, assigning reviewers, issuing editorial decisions and preparing proceedings. Authors can add co-authors and track submission status, while administrators manage conferences, users and invitations.

Its review workflow combines reviewer assignment and conflict-of-interest flags with blind peer review, structured scoring and due-date tracking. Editors can accept, reject or request revisions, and automated decision notifications keep authors informed. The workflow continues through camera-ready paper uploads and deadline management, with proceedings generation included. That breadth makes PaperDesk a fit for conferences that want submission and review operations connected to editorial decisions and final paper collection, rather than a tool focused only on file intake.

PaperDesk is free and available through the web as a cloud service. The described platform centers on conference administration and does not target general journal publishing, so journal teams or organizations needing a broader publishing system should consider alternatives. The product details also describe no wider integration ecosystem, making it a more natural choice for small or mid-market conference teams whose core needs are contained within its submission, review and proceedings workflow. Overall, its strongest case is a conference seeking a no-cost way to coordinate manuscripts, reviewers and decisions in one system; it is less suited to buyers prioritizing journal workflows or an extensive platform ecosystem.

PaperDesk pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Combines blind review, conflict flags and structured reviewer scoring.
    • Tracks submissions, reviewer due dates and camera-ready deadlines.
    • Supports editorial decisions, author notifications and proceedings generation.
  • Where it doesn't
    • Focused on conference workflows rather than general journal publishing.
    • Web-only access may not suit teams seeking other platform options.
    • The published product details do not describe a broader integration ecosystem.

PaperDesk fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update