Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

PAC review

Free#18 of 26 in PDF Accessibility SoftwareAccessibility Testing Software

A focused, free validator for PDF/UA and WCAG checks on Windows.

7.7/10Editor score
PAC7.7 Visit PAC

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

PAC is a free Windows desktop application for people and organizations creating or reviewing accessible PDF documents. It checks PDF files against PDF/UA and WCAG requirements, combining automated technical tests with semantic and manual inspection tools. The application runs locally and offline, and its scope is centered on validating document accessibility rather than providing a full remediation workflow.

Its strongest feature set is the breadth of document-structure review. PAC checks titles, language attributes, headings, bookmarks, alternative text, links, lists, tables, and notes. AI-assisted semantic checks cover headings, paragraphs, lists, tables, figures, and related structures. Reviewers can inspect the logical structure and tag tree, use a screen-reader preview to assess reading order, and produce summary or detailed validation reports. Exportable PDF test reports support documentation of review results. The vendor states that technical tests are based on WCAG 2.1 while PAC also checks WCAG 2.2 content requirements, with human checks still needed for requirements that automation cannot assess.

The platform fit is deliberately narrow: PAC is documented for Windows 10 and Windows 11, with no Mac version, no mobile testing, and no CI/CD integration. That makes it a practical choice for Windows-based accessibility validation of individual PDF documents or review workflows that benefit from local, offline processing. Organizations seeking browser-based, cross-platform, automated pipeline coverage, or a broader remediation environment should look elsewhere. Choose PAC when free PDF/UA and WCAG validation, semantic inspection, and report generation are the priority; avoid it when platform breadth or integrated delivery workflows matter more.

PAC pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Free PDF/UA and WCAG validation with automated technical checks
    • AI-assisted semantic checks plus structure and tag-tree inspection
    • Screen-reader previews and exportable detailed PDF reports
  • Where it doesn't
    • Windows 10 and 11 only, with no Mac version
    • Focuses on validation rather than document remediation
    • No mobile testing or CI/CD integration

PAC fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update