Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Orhuman review

Free#34 of 45 in AI Content Detection Software

A free browser-based analyzer for text classification, fragment highlights, and authorship signals.

5.4/10Editor score
Orhuman5.4 Visit Orhuman

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Orhuman is a browser-based text analysis service for editors, teachers, authors, and students who want an additional perspective on a passage’s authorship. It classifies text as authorial, editorial, generated, or hybrid, and highlights machine-generated and human-written fragments paragraph by paragraph. The service is free and runs on the web, so it may suit individuals looking for a lightweight check rather than a managed team workflow. Its own caution is important: results can be wrong and should not be the sole basis for academic or employment decisions.

The analysis goes beyond a single AI-probability signal. Orhuman displays origin, variability, editing traces, and translation traces, alongside stylometric analysis and online source matching and fact-checking. Users can paste text or provide a standard .txt file, then copy results to the clipboard. Recent checks are kept in browser LocalStorage. That combination makes it relevant when a reader wants both authorship indicators and source-oriented checks in one browser-based process; it is less suited to workflows that depend on directly submitting Word or PDF documents.

Orhuman’s narrow appeal is its free, individual text review, not formal documentation or decision-grade proof. The product does not export reports, and its advisory warning limits how much weight users should place on a classification. It may be worth considering for a preliminary second opinion on text that can be pasted or supplied as .txt. Readers needing downloadable reports, direct Word or PDF uploads, or a definitive basis for consequential judgments should choose another approach. The site mentions API integration discussions, but the product’s documented user-facing workflow centers on the browser analyzer.

Orhuman pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Classifies text as authorial, editorial, generated, or hybrid
    • Highlights human- and machine-written fragments paragraph by paragraph
    • Combines stylometric signals with online source matching and fact-checking
  • Where it doesn't
    • Accepts pasted text or .txt files, not direct Word or PDF uploads
    • Results can be wrong and are advisory, not a sole basis for decisions
    • Does not provide report exports

Orhuman fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update