Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

OpenFrame review

Freemium#21 of 36 in Video Review Software

A focused video review workspace with flexible hosting and practical approval tools.

6.0/10Editor score
OpenFrame6.0 Visit OpenFrame

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

OpenFrame is a video review and approval platform for freelancers, studios, and video teams. It combines browser-based review links with timestamped comments, voice notes, drawings, annotations, version history, side-by-side comparison, approval requests, and feedback exports. Clients can review through share links without creating accounts, making it suited to teams that need a straightforward way to collect and organize feedback across video revisions.

Pricing is split between a hosted cloud plan and self-hosting. Hosted cloud costs $10 per month and includes unlimited collaborators and clients, 200 GB of storage, permissioned share links, comments, voice notes, annotations, version comparison, history, approvals, and PDF and CSV exports. A 7-day free trial is available. The self-hosted option includes the full source code, Docker setup, and deployment on your own infrastructure; releases become Apache 2.0 after two years. This makes the product more adaptable for teams deciding between managed hosting and infrastructure control.

OpenFrame’s strongest fit is a focused review workflow rather than a broad editing ecosystem. YouTube imports, direct uploads, S3-compatible storage, Google OAuth, GitHub OAuth, SMTP, Telegram, Stripe, and Bunny Stream support provide useful surrounding connections, while comment replies, resolution states, tags, and approval tracking help keep feedback organized. Teams that want simple client review, version comparison, and sign-off tools should find the feature set well aligned. Teams requiring verified NLE integrations or more advanced reviewer roles should choose an alternative designed around those needs.

OpenFrame pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Timestamped comments, voice notes, drawings, and frame annotations
    • Version comparison, approval requests, and sign-off tracking
    • Hosted cloud or Docker-based self-hosted deployment
  • Where it doesn't
    • No verified NLE integrations are listed
    • Reviewer roles are basic
    • Self-hosting requires your own infrastructure and Docker

OpenFrame fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update