Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Open Scans review

Free#60 of 129 in Website Accessibility Tools

A GitHub-based workflow for recurring, cross-engine scans of public web pages.

3.5/10Editor score
Open Scans3.5 Visit Open Scans

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Open Scans is an open-source website accessibility scanning tool for content and design teams, accessibility practitioners, developers, and DevOps teams. It focuses on automated testing of batches of publicly accessible web pages. A GitHub Pages form accepts scan requests, GitHub Issues tracks those requests, and GitHub Actions runs the scans. The workflow publishes results to GitHub Pages and supports WCAG 2.2 checks and reporting. Its positioning suits teams that want a repeatable, code-oriented process rather than a broader accessibility service.

Its strongest differentiator is multi-engine coverage. Open Scans runs axe, ALFA, IBM Equal Access, AccessLint, and QualWeb, then provides cross-engine comparison and overlap analysis. That makes the reports useful for reviewing where engines agree or differ, while HTML, Markdown, CSV, and JSON exports support different reporting and follow-up needs. Recurring weekly, monthly, and quarterly scans add an ongoing monitoring layer, and GitHub Pages, GitHub Issues, GitHub Actions, and the GitHub Models API form the surrounding platform ecosystem.

The trade-off is its narrow scope. Open Scans is designed for automated scans of public URLs, so teams needing verified manual review, mobile testing, or API access should choose a different accessibility product or add separate workflows. Publicly published scan results also make the publication model an important consideration. There are no commercial paid tiers to compare; its open-source model is the central access approach. Pick Open Scans when GitHub-based execution, batch scanning, recurring schedules, WCAG 2.2 reporting, and cross-engine analysis are priorities. Avoid it when private-page coverage, manual assessment, mobile workflows, or API-driven integration are required.

Open Scans pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Scans batches of public URLs with five accessibility engines
    • Supports recurring weekly, monthly, and quarterly scans
    • Exports HTML, Markdown, CSV, and JSON reports
  • Where it doesn't
    • Only supports publicly accessible URLs
    • Does not provide verified manual review or mobile testing
    • API access is not available

Open Scans fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update