Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Meetropolis review

Free#16 of 22 in Virtual Meeting Room Software

A developer-focused 2D meeting world with self-hosting, spatial interaction, and APIs.

7.4/10Editor score
Meetropolis7.4 Visit Meetropolis

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Meetropolis is an open-source virtual office for remote teams that want meetings to take place in a shared 2D environment. Participants interact in real time, with audio and video shaped by proximity in the virtual world. The product is especially suited to developers building a branded or self-hosted meeting experience, rather than teams seeking a conventional video-conferencing interface. Its open-source components use dual AGPL-3.0 and MIT licensing, and the project includes a Tiamat-managed instance alongside its self-hosted option.

Its strongest differentiator is the combination of spatial interaction and developer control. The platform includes proximity-based spatial audio, proximity-based video, a live 2D world, screen-sharing controls, and guest invitations through magic links. API tokens provide presence controls, while integrations with LiveKit, Colyseus, Phaser, and PostgreSQL support the underlying real-time, graphics, communication, and data layers. Docker deployment gives technical teams a defined path to hosting the open-source components, although the platform is best matched to organizations comfortable managing a web-based application and its infrastructure.

Meetropolis is a focused choice for teams that value open-source access, self-hosting, and an interactive virtual-office format. It can also suit developers who need to extend presence behavior or connect the experience to a broader application stack. Teams looking for broad platform coverage, a standard meeting-room workflow, or a large set of mature collaboration features may prefer a more conventional meeting product. The closed-source Brand, Enterprise, and Desktop modules also create a distinction between the open-source foundation and the wider commercial offering. Choose Meetropolis when the 2D world and developer integration model are central requirements; look elsewhere when simplicity or broad feature coverage matters more.

Meetropolis pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Self-hosted Docker deployment with PostgreSQL and LiveKit
    • Proximity-based spatial audio and video in a live 2D world
    • Guest magic links, screen sharing, and presence-control API tokens
  • Where it doesn't
    • Platform coverage centers on web and self-hosted deployments
    • Feature depth is focused on 2D virtual meeting spaces
    • Commercial Brand, Enterprise, and Desktop modules are closed source

Meetropolis fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update