Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

MediumEditor review

Free#33 of 37 in Rich Text Editor Software

A focused open-source editor for inline formatting with extension-based tables and media.

6.0/10Editor score
MediumEditor6.0 Visit MediumEditor

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

MediumEditor is an open-source, browser-based rich text editor for teams building web interfaces that need inline editing. Inspired by Medium.com’s inline editor, it uses the HTML5 contenteditable API and presents a floating formatting toolbar. Its core controls cover text formatting, headings, lists, alignment, links, quotations, and code-related formatting. The library runs on the web and can be installed through npm, Bower, a CDN, or a downloaded self-hosted setup.

Its standout strength is a focused inline editing model with room for customization. Developers can work with editable HTML elements or textarea-backed editing with synchronized HTML content, then tailor the experience through custom buttons, extensions, and event handlers. That approach fits products where a lightweight editing surface matters more than a large built-in toolset. Table insertion is available through the MediumEditor Tables extension, while image uploads and social or video embeds are available through extensions for Twitter, YouTube, and Vimeo.

MediumEditor is a suitable choice for web projects that want open-source deployment and control over an inline editor’s interface and capabilities. Its extension model can expand the core feature set, but it also means some requirements sit outside the base editor. Teams seeking tables, uploads, or embeds should account for the relevant extensions when shaping their implementation. Projects that need a broader editor experience within the core package or wider platform coverage should consider a different rich text editor. MediumEditor fits best when minimal inline editing, HTML synchronization, and selective customization are the main priorities.

MediumEditor pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Inline toolbar covers formatting, headings, lists, links, and quotations.
    • HTML synchronization supports editable elements and textarea-backed editing.
    • Extensions add tables, image uploads, and Twitter, YouTube, and Vimeo embeds.
  • Where it doesn't
    • Core editing features stay focused rather than covering a broad feature set.
    • Table and media capabilities depend on separate extensions.
    • Self-hosted web deployment requires responsibility for the editor environment.

MediumEditor fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update