Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Known review

Freemium#28 of 125 in Blogging Platforms

A flexible open-source choice for large, self-hosted, multi-author sites.

6.2/10Editor score
Visit Known
Known6.2 Visit Known

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Known is an open-source publishing and collaboration platform for individual creators, groups, educators, and community publishers. It supports blog posts, status updates, photos, audio, links, static pages, and multi-author sites, with a stated author limit of up to 200. The platform runs on the web or on a self-hosted server, making it a strong fit for organizations that want control over hosting, domains, code, and publishing workflows. Privacy controls also support private or restricted sites.

The free basic service establishes an accessible starting point, while paid upgrades are available for expanded use. Known's feature set covers custom domains, HTML and rich-text editing, custom CSS and JavaScript, blog analytics, and several feed formats: RSS, XML, JSON, and KML. Its breadth is notable for a blogging platform, especially for publishers combining long-form posts with media, short updates, and community contributions. Buyers should still map their requirements carefully if budgeting depends on comparing specific paid tiers or if scheduled publishing is central to the workflow.

Known's ecosystem connects with Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Flickr, Foursquare, SoundCloud, and Webhooks. Social-network syndication, internal and external APIs, themes, plugins, custom CSS, and JavaScript give technical teams multiple ways to extend publishing and distribution. That flexibility favors larger communities and self-managed sites over teams seeking a tightly packaged, highly standardized platform. Choose Known for open publishing, multi-author collaboration, self-hosting, and varied content types; consider an alternative when a broader integration catalog, clearly structured paid plans, scheduled publishing, or native membership features are essential.

Known pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Supports multi-author publishing for up to 200 authors
    • Combines posts, status updates, photos, audio, links, and static pages
    • Offers custom code, feeds, syndication, APIs, and privacy controls
  • Where it doesn't
    • Paid upgrade costs are not suited to simple plan comparison
    • The integration ecosystem is focused rather than broad
    • Less suitable when scheduled publishing or native memberships are central

Known fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update