Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Features.Vote review

#23 of 36 in Feature Request Software

A low-cost voting board with roadmap tools and native Apple SDKs.

6.7/10Editor score
Features.Vote6.7 Visit Features.Vote

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Features.Vote is feature-request software for SaaS and app teams that want a public channel for collecting and prioritizing ideas. Users can submit and upvote requests, while teams publish roadmap views and release announcements through a public changelog. Moderation tools, comments, email notifications, embeddable widgets, customization, and duplicate-request merging support the feedback workflow. Its native SwiftUI SDK extends board access to iOS, iPadOS, and macOS applications, and the service also exposes administrative access through a REST API and MCP server.

Pricing is organized around Lite and Growth, with monthly and annual billing. Lite costs $9 per month or $90 per year and includes a public voting board, public roadmap, email notifications, moderation tools, and basic customization. Growth costs $29 per month or $290 per year and adds unlimited projects, an activity log, analytics, unlimited comments, user segmentation, and private boards. A 14-day trial is available without a credit card. The lower-cost Lite plan suits a solo builder validating a focused feedback loop; teams needing private collection, reporting, or multiple projects should budget for Growth.

The product runs on web, iOS, macOS, and cloud or mobile deployments. Its API and MCP server provide a route for administrative integrations and AI-assisted board management, while the Apple SDK is a notable fit for teams building native Apple software. The listed ecosystem is narrower than a platform centered on broad third-party connectors, so organizations requiring extensive prebuilt integrations may prefer another option. Choose Features.Vote when public voting, roadmap communication, and a low entry price matter most; look elsewhere if private-first workflows or a wide integration catalog are central requirements.

Features.Vote pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Public boards, upvotes, roadmaps, and changelog announcements
    • Native SwiftUI SDK for iOS and macOS applications
    • Duplicate merging, moderation, widgets, email alerts, API, and MCP server
  • Where it doesn't
    • No free plan; access starts at $9 per month
    • Growth features are required for analytics and private boards
    • Integrations are limited to the REST API and MCP server

Features.Vote fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update