Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Editor.js review

Free#8 of 37 in Rich Text Editor Software

A flexible developer-focused editor for structured content, not built-in collaboration.

7.7/10Editor score
Editor.js7.7 Visit Editor.js

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Editor.js is an open-source, block-based rich text editor for developers adding content creation to web products. It organizes content into configurable blocks such as paragraphs, headings, lists, images, quotes, tables, and embeds, then returns structured JSON instead of a complete HTML document. That model suits teams building content systems that need to validate, sanitize, transform, and render the same material across web, mobile, or other channels. It supports web, API, and self-hosted deployments, with JavaScript and TypeScript framework support.

Its strongest differentiator is the plugin-based editing model. Developers can create custom block and inline tools, configure an inline toolbar, add block tunes, and adjust editor behavior. The published feature set also covers read-only mode, an internationalization API, and paste handling for tags, files, and patterns. Media handling includes images, file attachments, and embeds for YouTube, Twitch, Vimeo, Gfycat, Instagram, and Twitter. These capabilities make Editor.js a fit for products that need a tailored authoring interface while retaining control over the resulting content structure.

Editor.js is free and open source, with self-hosted deployment rather than a hosted product tier. That keeps the editor adaptable for development teams comfortable owning implementation and infrastructure, but it also places rendering, deployment, and operational decisions within the application. Real-time collaboration is not included, so teams selecting an editor for simultaneous document editing should consider another option. Choose Editor.js when structured content, extensibility, sanitization support, and multi-channel output matter more than a ready-made collaboration layer; avoid it when hosted operations or built-in collaborative editing are central requirements.

Editor.js pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Structured JSON supports validation, transformation, and multi-channel rendering
    • Custom blocks, inline tools, and block tunes extend the editing experience
    • Supports sanitization, read-only mode, localization, embeds, and paste handling
  • Where it doesn't
    • Real-time collaboration is not included
    • Self-hosted deployment requires application-side infrastructure
    • Structured JSON requires rendering logic for web, mobile, or other channels

Editor.js fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update