Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Crowdmark review

#23 of 33 in Automated Grading SoftwareRubric Software

A collaborative grading workspace spanning scanned paper, online assignments, rubrics, and LMS workflows.

6.9/10Editor score
Crowdmark6.9 Visit Crowdmark

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Crowdmark is a web-based grading and analytics platform for educators and grading teams handling paper and digital coursework. It supports scanned paper assessments alongside online assignments containing image/PDF, text, and multiple-choice responses. Instructors can coordinate grading, annotate student work, apply rubrics and scores, return results electronically, and review performance data. Its strongest fit is collaborative assessment across courses where paper handling, shared grading responsibilities, and LMS workflows need to sit in one system.

The workflow covers several stages of assessment rather than focusing only on score entry. Multiple-choice questions can be graded automatically, while graders can use annotations, comments, rubrics, and score-based grading for broader responses. Collaborative grading teams receive role-based permissions, and handwritten student-identification matching uses OCR to connect scanned work with students. Performance analytics and data export extend the product beyond marking, while API access supports deeper data analysis. The platform is therefore suited to teams that need structured coordination and reporting across paper and online submissions.

Crowdmark connects with Canvas, Brightspace, Blackboard, and Moodle through LTI 1.3, with roster synchronization and gradebook export included in the published capabilities. It offers annual subscription and course-based subscription plans, with pricing handled through contact with sales rather than a published amount; there is no free plan. Choose Crowdmark when collaborative paper grading, digital assignment support, LMS connectivity, and assessment analytics are central requirements. It is less suitable for buyers seeking a self-serve free tier or OCR that evaluates handwritten written work itself.

Crowdmark pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Supports scanned paper, image/PDF, text, and multiple-choice assignments
    • Collaborative rubrics, permissions, annotations, comments, and analytics
    • LTI 1.3, LMS synchronization, gradebook export, and API access
  • Where it doesn't
    • No free plan is available
    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • OCR matches handwritten student identification, not written work

Crowdmark fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update