Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Conloca review

Free#11 of 23 in Git-Based CMS

A free, open-source visual CMS that keeps Astro content in Git.

8.3/10Editor score
Conloca8.3 Visit Conloca

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Conloca is a free, open-source content management system built for Astro websites. It combines a browser-based visual drag-and-drop editor with Git-native content storage, keeping content in version-controlled VXJSON or MDX files instead of a database or external SaaS service. It is aimed at Astro teams that want visual editing for content managers while developers retain control of components and the codebase. The platform runs on the web, through an API, or in a self-hosted setup, and can operate alongside an Astro site using Bun or Node.js.

Its strongest distinction is the connection between visual editing and Git workflows. Editors can work with pages and MDX fragments in the browser, while automatic commits include author attribution. Configurable Astro routing connects content to the site structure, and the CMS also includes structured data schema editing, a media library with folders, tags, and usage tracking, plus multi-site and multi-locale management. Cloudflare Access JWT authentication is available for access control. This combination suits teams that want content changes represented directly in their repository and reviewable through their existing Git process.

Conloca is a good fit for Astro projects that value ownership of content files, self-hosting, and a focused visual workflow. Its integrations include Astro, Puck, Bun, Node.js, and Cloudflare Access, but its verified integrations and workflow details are narrower than those of broader Git-based CMS options. Teams seeking a CMS centered on Astro routing, Git commits, and file-based content should find the feature set aligned with that approach. Teams needing a wider ecosystem or a different site framework should consider an alternative with broader platform coverage.

Conloca pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Free and open source with self-hosted deployment
    • Visual editing with Git-native VXJSON and automatic attributed commits
    • Supports media, schemas, multi-site, and multi-locale content
  • Where it doesn't
    • Self-hosted deployment puts hosting responsibility on the team
    • Verified integrations and workflow details are relatively narrow
    • Its Astro focus may not suit teams using other site frameworks

Conloca fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update