Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Claritar review

Freemium#4 of 29 in Writing Style Checkers

A focused web tool for measuring and enforcing brand voice across content.

8.7/10Editor score
Claritar8.7 Visit Claritar

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Claritar is a web-based brand voice consistency tool for agencies, freelancers, small teams, and in-house content groups managing one or more brands. It scores drafts from 0–100 with A–F grades, breaks down voice, tone, banned words, and keywords, and explains line-level violations. Teams can define preferred terms, banned words, required keywords, tone targets, readability targets, and approval thresholds. The platform also learns from on-brand samples, generates rewrites, and supports multi-language scoring.

Pricing follows a freemium structure. The Free plan costs $0 per month and includes brand-voice scoring, terminology and word-choice rules, PDF reports, approval workflow and thresholds, and multi-language scoring. Starter costs $19 per month and adds writer scorecards and site-wide audits. Pro costs $49 per month and adds a strictness dial, section scoring, and white-label reports while retaining workflow and audit features. Agency costs $99 per month and adds voice auto-refine, white-label reports and share pages, priority support, approval controls, and site-wide audits. The published pricing also presents an annual view with 2 months free.

Claritar’s strongest fit is a team that needs repeatable voice checks across drafts and websites rather than a general-purpose writing environment. Its combination of rules, scorecards, approval gates, PDF exports, sitemap auditing, and shareable reports gives agencies a structured way to review multiple brands. Website content can be assessed through page URLs and sitemaps, while writing is handled in a web paste-in editor. The trade-off is a web-only workflow without integrations or editor connections, which may limit adoption in teams that need checks inside other writing tools. Choose Claritar for centralized brand governance; choose an alternative if embedded integrations are essential.

Claritar pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Scores voice, tone, terminology, and keywords with clear explanations
    • Combines rules, rewrites, approvals, audits, and writer scorecards
    • Supports multi-language scoring and white-label reporting on higher plans
  • Where it doesn't
    • Web-only access limits workflow flexibility
    • Integrations and editor connections are not part of the platform
    • Advanced reporting and automation require higher-priced plans

Claritar fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update