Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Chronolapse review

Free#16 of 36 in Time-Lapse Software

A free, open-source desktop choice for scheduled screen and webcam time-lapses.

6.5/10Editor score
Chronolapse6.5 Visit Chronolapse

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Chronolapse is an open-source desktop application for creating time-lapse sequences from scheduled screenshots and webcam captures. It suits solo creators and small teams that want recurring visual records from a computer screen, a webcam, or both. Capture frequency is configurable, and images can receive timestamp overlays and sequential or timestamp-based filenames. The project uses OpenCV for webcam capture and publishes its source code under the MIT license on GitHub.

Its workflow centers on scheduled acquisition and straightforward compositing. Picture-in-picture can combine webcam and screen imagery, while the captured sequence can be rendered into a time-lapse video through MEncoder. Audio can be added during video production, and the category specifications list JPG, PNG, GIF, and MPEG-4 video among supported outputs. These features make Chronolapse a practical fit for demonstrations, progress records, and other recurring desktop captures where repeatable intervals matter more than advanced camera controls.

The main trade-off is a focused, dependency-based desktop workflow. MEncoder is required for video rendering, so producing finished videos involves an additional component beyond the capture application. Chronolapse does not provide deflicker, camera control, or raw photo support, which limits its suitability for photographic workflows requiring exposure management or image-sequence refinement. Choose it when scheduled screen and webcam capture, timestamps, compositing, and basic rendering cover the brief; consider a broader time-lapse system when camera automation, deflickering, or raw-image pipelines are central requirements.

Chronolapse pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Scheduled screenshots and OpenCV webcam capture
    • Timestamp overlays, filename controls, and picture-in-picture
    • MEncoder video rendering with optional audio addition
  • Where it doesn't
    • Video rendering requires MEncoder
    • Desktop deployment only
    • No built-in deflicker, camera control, or raw photo support

Chronolapse fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update