Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Botoi Readability API review

Freemium#20 of 25 in Readability CheckersAI Readability Checkers

A focused readability API with three scoring formulas and 150+ endpoints.

6.4/10Editor score
Botoi Readability API6.4 Visit Botoi

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Botoi Readability API analyzes English text through a POST JSON endpoint and returns Flesch-Kincaid Grade, Flesch Reading Ease, and Gunning Fog scores. It also provides sentence, word, syllable, and complex-word counts, giving developers a focused way to add readability checks to CMS workflows, publishing systems, legal or medical drafting tools, and content analysis pipelines. Optional authentication and JSON responses support application-based integrations, while MCP server access is available across the published plans.

Pricing follows a freemium model. The Free plan costs $0 per month and includes all 150+ endpoints, MCP server access, JSON responses, and community support, with free usage subject to rate limits. Starter costs $9 per month and adds email support and a usage dashboard. Pro costs $49 per month and adds priority support, webhook notifications, and a 99.9% uptime SLA. Business costs $199 per month and includes dedicated support, webhook notifications, a usage dashboard, and the same 99.9% uptime SLA. All paid plans retain access to the 150+ endpoints and MCP server.

The product’s strength is its narrow, developer-oriented focus: teams can retrieve standardized readability scores and supporting counts in structured JSON rather than relying on a separate editorial interface. That makes it suitable for automated checks inside existing software, especially when English content is the target. Its scope is less suited to multilingual workflows, since the grade mapping is calibrated for English, and it does not provide AI features. Choose Botoi when an API-first readability layer and predictable plan progression are the priority; consider a broader tool when users need a wider language range or capabilities beyond readability analysis.

Botoi Readability API pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Three readability formulas plus sentence and word analysis
    • Free plan includes all 150+ endpoints and JSON responses
    • Paid plans add support, dashboards, webhooks, and an uptime SLA
  • Where it doesn't
    • Meaningful grade mapping is calibrated for English
    • Free usage is rate-limited
    • API-only delivery requires workflow integration

Botoi Readability API fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update