Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

ADL Open Source LRS review

Free#16 of 23 in Learning Record Store Software

A focused, self-hosted xAPI 2.0 LRS for small deployments and proof-of-concept work.

7.4/10Editor score
ADL Open Source LRS7.4 Visit site

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

ADL Open Source LRS is a self-hosted learning record store for collecting, storing, and retrieving learning data through xAPI. Maintained by Advanced Distributed Learning and distributed under the Apache License 2.0, it is aimed at developers and small teams that want an open implementation rather than a managed service. The project supports xAPI 2.0 and exposes statement, agent, activity, profile, state, and about resources. Its API-based record export fits applications that need direct access to learning records.

Deployment is centered on Docker Compose, with PostgreSQL-backed statement storage. Authentication options include HTTP Basic Authentication and optional OAuth 1.0 authentication. This gives technical teams a defined path for running the LRS and connecting it to systems that can send or retrieve xAPI statements. The feature set stays focused on the core LRS role: storing and retrieving statements, managing related xAPI resources, and providing a self-hosted foundation for experimentation or a small production footprint. Teams should expect to handle deployment and infrastructure decisions themselves.

ADL Open Source LRS is most suitable for developers who need a simple open LRS, control over deployment, and a focused xAPI 2.0 implementation. It is less suitable for organizations seeking a managed platform, broad verified integrations, or a deployment intended for many users. The project is positioned for a small number of users and proof-of-concept work, so teams with larger operational requirements should assess whether its narrow scope matches their environment before adopting it.

ADL Open Source LRS pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Supports xAPI 2.0 with core statement-related resources
    • Docker Compose simplifies self-hosted installation
    • PostgreSQL-backed storage with HTTP and optional OAuth authentication
  • Where it doesn't
    • Designed for a small number of users and proof-of-concept deployments
    • Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure management
    • No verified integrations are provided

ADL Open Source LRS fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update