Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

AccessLint review

Freemium#21 of 129 in Website Accessibility ToolsWeb Accessibility SoftwareAccessibility Testing Software

Adds accessibility reviews to pull requests, CI checks and monitored user journeys.

7.0/10Editor score
AccessLint7.0 Visit AccessLint

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

AccessLint is a web accessibility testing toolkit for development teams that want checks across code review, CI and production monitoring. It runs automated WCAG checks on public pages and GitHub repositories, adds inline reviews to pull requests, and can monitor saved user journeys. Playwright and Vitest assertions and Storybook component audits bring checks into development workflows; a Chrome extension adds real-time page audits and AI-generated remediation guidance. Its scope suits solo developers and small to mid-market teams that want accessibility work integrated into their existing development process.

The plans divide mainly by repository access and monitoring needs. Free is $0 and includes public-repository pull-request reviews, one monitored flow with daily runs, and violation trends. Starter is $19 per month or $190 per year; it adds private-repository reviews, deploy-triggered scans and shareable evidence reports. Pro is $349 per month or $3,490 per year, includes everything in Starter, and raises monitoring to 20 flows with daily runs on each. A 14-day free trial is also offered. Teams can begin with public projects at no cost, while private repositories and deploy-triggered scans call for Starter or higher.

The main distinction is breadth across the development lifecycle: checks span pull requests, test frameworks, Storybook, a browser extension and monitored journeys. That makes AccessLint a fit for teams that want both code-level feedback and recurring checks after deployment, rather than a tool limited to one point in the workflow. The Free plan's single monitored flow and public-repository restriction may be too narrow for private projects. Teams needing more monitored flows face the substantially higher Pro price; teams looking only for a focused browser audit may not need the broader workflow coverage. Documentation is the listed support channel, so teams seeking other support routes may prefer another option.

AccessLint pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Reviews public pages and GitHub repositories, including pull requests
    • Supports Playwright, Vitest and Storybook accessibility checks
    • Monitors saved user journeys and provides AI remediation guidance
  • Where it doesn't
    • The Free plan limits monitoring to one flow and public repositories
    • Private-repository reviews and deploy-triggered scans require a paid plan
    • Pro costs $349 per month for 20 monitored flows

AccessLint fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update