Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

accessio-scan review

Free#102 of 129 in Website Accessibility Tools

A focused, CI-ready scanner for page-level WCAG checks and SARIF reporting.

3.0/10Editor score
accessio-scan3.0 Visit accessio-scan

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

accessio-scan is a free, MIT-licensed command-line accessibility scanner for developers and engineering teams. Built with axe-core and Playwright, it scans a URL for WCAG violations and runs locally without an account or signup. The tool is designed for development and continuous integration workflows, with a page-focused approach that suits teams adding automated accessibility checks to their engineering process.

Its strongest fit is CI reporting. accessio-scan provides exit codes that can act as a CI gate, while console, JSON, and SARIF output support different reporting workflows. SARIF results can be integrated with GitHub Code Scanning, giving teams a direct path from an automated scan to code-scanning results. The scanner also waits for a CSS selector before scanning, which supports pages whose relevant content appears after initial loading. Developers who need code-level integration can use the programmatic Node.js scanning API.

The scope is intentionally narrow. accessio-scan currently scans a single page, so teams needing crawling or sitemap-based coverage should look for a broader platform. It also focuses on automated checks rather than manual accessibility review, and it does not provide scheduled monitoring. That makes it a practical choice for open-source, self-hosted scanning in development or CI, particularly when WCAG 2.1 or WCAG 2.2 coverage and SARIF output matter. Organizations seeking ongoing site-wide monitoring, manual assessment, or wider platform coverage should choose an alternative with those capabilities.

accessio-scan pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Supports WCAG 2.1 and WCAG 2.2 audits
    • CI-ready exit codes with console, JSON, and SARIF output
    • Dynamic-content waits and a programmatic Node.js API
  • Where it doesn't
    • Scans a single page rather than crawling a site
    • Does not provide manual accessibility review
    • Does not include scheduled monitoring or broader platform coverage

accessio-scan fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update