iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Short answer: the leading current interpretation is that Nanotyrannus was not simply a young Tyrannosaurus rex. A 2025 analysis in Nature concluded that Nanotyrannus is distinguishable from Tyrannosaurus, falls outside Tyrannosauridae, and represents two species, N. lancensis and N. lethaeus. Scientists reach that conclusion by testing maturity and anatomy together: bone microstructure, skeletal fusion, growth trajectories, skull construction, tooth patterns and evolutionary relationships. No single feature, including size or tooth count, settles the identification.
The current scientific position
The newest major analysis, published in Nature in 2025, treats Nanotyrannus as a valid tyrannosaur separate from Tyrannosaurus rex. Its authors combined comparative anatomy, longitudinal growth models, ontogenetic character analysis, bone microstructure and a phylogenetic dataset built from firsthand examination of 120 tyrannosaur specimens. The resulting analysis places Nanotyrannus outside Tyrannosauridae and outside the Tyrannosaurus lineage.
The study recognizes two species: Nanotyrannus lancensis, the name historically associated with the Cleveland skull, and Nanotyrannus lethaeus. Princeton University’s summary of the work likewise describes the small skull as belonging to a full-grown animal rather than a juvenile T. rex.
Recommended Free Tools
This is the current leading conclusion, not a claim that every specialist has always agreed. The classification changed several times because the fossils are incomplete, the sample is small and some developmental evidence has been interpreted in opposite ways. The useful question is therefore not “Is it small?” but “Does its anatomy show an immature T. rex, or a mature animal with a different evolutionary history?”
#1 Best Overall
- Read Before You Buy — No Video Output: These adapters support charging and USB 2.0 data transfer, but cannot transmit video signals. Except for standard USB webcams (which use USB data only), they are not compatible with HDMI/DisplayPort cables, video-capable USB-C hubs, or docking stations with video output.
- Convert USB-A Ports to USB-C: Designed to connect USB-C earphones, cables, flash drives, card readers, and other USB-C accessories to standard USB-A ports. Plug-and-play with no drivers or software required.
- Aluminum Alloy Housing: Built with a sturdy aluminum alloy shell that aids in heat dissipation and protects against daily wear and scratches. Designed to maintain a stable and secure connection.
- Compact & Travel-Friendly: The ultra-compact design allows the adapter to stay plugged into your device without blocking adjacent ports or adding bulk, reducing wear and tear on your original USB ports.
- 12-Month Warranty: Backed by a 12-month manufacturer warranty for peace of mind. Designed to meet strict quality control standards for reliable everyday performance.
Why the identity was controversial
The dispute centers on the Cleveland Museum of Natural History skull, catalogued as CMNH 7541, and related small tyrannosaur specimens. When first treated as a separate animal, the material was called Nanotyrannus lancensis. Many later workers argued that the skull was a young Tyrannosaurus because it shares broad features with T. rex and comes from rocks of the same general Late Cretaceous interval.
The juvenile interpretation became influential for two reasons. First, tyrannosaur skulls and teeth changed substantially as the animals grew, so a young individual can look unlike an adult. Second, large predators are often represented by fewer young fossils than adults, making it easy to mistake a growth stage for a separate species. Features proposed as evidence for Nanotyrannus could therefore be developmental differences rather than taxonomic ones.
A 2020 osteohistology study intensified the debate. It reported bone microstructure associated with active juvenile growth and supported synonymizing “Nanotyrannus” with Tyrannosaurus. In that interpretation, the Cleveland skull represented a growing animal that would eventually have become a giant adult T. rex.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesThe 2025 analysis reaches the opposite conclusion by integrating histology with growth modeling, skeletal anatomy and phylogeny. The disagreement illustrates why scientists do not identify a tyrannosaur from one striking skull feature or from body size alone.
How scientists test whether a small tyrannosaur is mature
1. Bone histology and growth rings
Researchers can remove tiny samples from weight-bearing bones and examine thin sections under a microscope. The tissue records how quickly the animal deposited bone. Vascular, rapidly deposited tissue generally indicates active growth; increasingly organized tissue and closely spaced lines can indicate that growth was slowing; a mature outer layer may show that the animal had approached its final size.
This method is powerful because it tests physiological age rather than simply comparing dimensions. It also has limits. Different bones can grow at different rates, preservation can be uneven and a single section may not represent the entire skeleton. Sampling location and interpretation therefore matter.
Rank #2
- 5-in-1 USB-C Hub: Experience comprehensive connectivity featuring a Power Delivery input, two USB-A 2.0 ports, a USB-A 3.0 port, and an HDMI port. (Note: The USB-C power delivery input port is only for connecting an external wall charger to power your laptop and cannot power peripheral devices.)
- 90W Pass-Through Charging: Achieve optimal charging with 90W pass-through power to your laptop, supported by a total input of 100W, with the hub reserving 10W for operational efficiency. (Note: Wall charger not included.)
- Quick Data Transfers: Accelerate your productivity with rapid data transfers using a high-speed 5Gbps USB 3.0 port and two 480Mbps USB 2.0 ports.
- 4K HDMI Display: Enhance your visual experience with a hub capable of delivering 4K resolution at 30Hz in both mirror and extend modes. Please note that this hub is compatible with MacBook (macOS 12 and newer), Windows 10 and 11, ChromeOS, and laptops equipped with DP Alt Mode and Power Delivery. Note: This device is not compatible with Linux.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (5-in-1, 4K HDMI), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
The 2020 study interpreted relevant specimens as actively growing juvenile T. rex. The 2025 analysis interpreted the Nanotyrannus material as mature or near-mature. Those are competing readings of developmental evidence, not merely different estimates of body length.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
2. Skeletal fusion and developmental anatomy
During growth, vertebrae and other bones may develop and fuse in a predictable sequence. Scientists inspect the degree of fusion, the texture of the bone surface and the shape of joints for signs of immaturity or completed development.
The Cleveland Museum of Natural History identifies full growth of the holotype skull as the key point in its interpretation: if the skull had reached adult dimensions and showed mature construction, it would not be a juvenile T. rex. Fusion evidence is strongest when several elements tell the same story. A single unfused joint does not automatically prove youth because fusion can vary between bones and individuals.
3. Growth curves and predicted adult size
A juvenile T. rex should fit a growth trajectory that leads toward the enormous adult form known from mature specimens. Researchers therefore plot measurements from multiple individuals against estimated ages, then test whether the small specimens can plausibly continue along the same curve.
The 2024 review The Taxonomic Status of Nanotyrannus summarizes growth-curve predictions that would have produced adult masses of about 1,500 kilograms or less for the proposed Nanotyrannus specimens. The 2025 Nature study reports mature Nanotyrannus estimates of roughly 700–1,000 kilograms. These figures are study-specific model outputs, not universal weights for every individual or a substitute for direct measurement.
The key test is the shape of the curve. A separate species can show slower, decelerating growth and stop at a smaller adult size, whereas a juvenile T. rex should eventually converge on the growth pattern of large adult Tyrannosaurus. Models are sensitive to the ages assigned to fossils and to which specimens are grouped together, so they are evaluated alongside anatomy.
Rank #3
- Sleek 7-in-1 USB-C Hub: Features an HDMI port, two USB-A 3.0 ports, and a USB-C data port, each providing 5Gbps transfer speeds. It also includes a USB-C PD input port for charging up to 100W and dual SD and TF card slots, all in a compact design.
- Flawless 4K@60Hz Video with HDMI: Delivers exceptional clarity and smoothness with its 4K@60Hz HDMI port, making it ideal for high-definition presentations and entertainment. (Note: Only the HDMI port supports video projection; the USB-C port is for data transfer only.)
- Double Up on Efficiency: The two USB-A 3.0 ports and a USB-C port support a fast 5Gbps data rate, significantly boosting your transfer speeds and improving productivity.
- Fast and Reliable 85W Charging: Offers high-capacity, speedy charging for laptops up to 85W, so you spend less time tethered to an outlet and more time being productive.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (7-in-1), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
4. Skull architecture
Skull comparisons involve a character combination rather than one visual shortcut. Studies discuss the position and degree of concealment of the promaxillary and maxillary fenestrae, the shape of the maxilla, the form of the lacrimal horn, proportions of the orbit, breadth of the jugal, curvature of the orbital bar and features of the skull roof.
These structures change during tyrannosaur growth, which is why an apparent difference must be tested against a series of specimens. A character is more persuasive when it remains distinct after accounting for size and development, appears in more than one individual and fits a broader anatomical pattern.
In practice, scientists score dozens of skull and skeleton characters. They ask whether the small skull occupies a transitional position inside the known T. rex growth series or whether it forms a coherent separate cluster with its own combination of traits.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
5. Dentition
Tooth arrangement has been central to the argument. Proposed Nanotyrannus specimens have been described as having more tooth positions than typical adult T. rex, along with relatively large anterior maxillary teeth and other dental differences. The Australian Museum lists a higher tooth count as one historical argument for separating the animals.
Tooth count alone is not decisive. Tyrannosaurids can alter tooth number and spacing during growth, and replacement teeth may be missing or obscured in a fossil. Wear, breakage and incomplete jaws can also create misleading counts. Dental evidence becomes useful when it agrees with skull architecture, maturity indicators and the growth model.
6. Phylogenetic placement
Phylogenetic analysis tests relationships across many characters at once. Researchers code anatomical features for a broad sample, then calculate the evolutionary trees that best explain their distribution. This approach asks whether the small tyrannosaur nests within Tyrannosaurus or branches elsewhere.
Rank #4
- Dual Converters, Infinite Potential：Includes 2× USB C male to USB A female adapters and 2× USB A male to USB C female adapters. Perfect for a wide range of uses—tablets with Bluetooth keyboards, expand USB ports on macbook, and more. Two different converters for all your daily needs
- Next-Level 10Gbps & 3A Charging: No more slow 480Mbps, this usb to usb c adapter has a transfer speed of up to 10Gbps, allowing you to do more transferring in less time. This usb adapter fits both USB A and USB C charger, supporting up to 3A fast charging
- Upgraded Exquisite Craftsmanship: With an aluminum alloy housing and metal connector, the usbc to usb adapter is extremely durable and sturdy. Rigorously tested to withstand more than 10,000 times of plugging and unplugging, ensuring long-lasting performance
- Broad Compatible: The usb c to usb adapter widely supports all USB C/ USB A devices like laptops, tablets, cellphones, car chargers, and phone chargers. Such as compatible with MacBook Pro/Air 2023/2022, Thunderbolt 4/3 Devices,Apple MagSafe Watch 9/8/7/SE/Ultra, iPad Pro 2022/2021, Samsung Galaxy S23/S20/S10, and iPhone 17/16/15 Pro. Plug and play
- Please Note: To reach 10Gbps speed, keep the cable under 3.3 ft. For USB A Male to USB C adapters, try flipping the USB C connector. USB C Male to USB A adapters support bidirectional 10Gbps transfer within 3.3 ft
The 2025 study’s combined character matrix places Nanotyrannus outside Tyrannosauridae and separates it from the Tyrannosaurus lineage. That result is important because it is independent of a simple “small versus large” comparison: a fossil can be smaller for many reasons, but a consistent evolutionary position reflects its total character pattern.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Evidence compared at a glance
| Evidence type | What a juvenile T. rex prediction would require | How the Nanotyrannus interpretation is evaluated | Main caution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bone histology | Rapidly growing tissue and developmental patterns consistent with a young animal | Mature or near-mature microstructure in the relevant specimens according to the 2025 analysis | Results depend on bone sampled, sampling location and interpretation |
| Skeletal fusion | Unfinished fusion and other juvenile anatomy | Fusion and mature texture consistent with an animal near or at adult development | Fusion timing varies among bones and individuals |
| Growth modeling | A curve that continues toward the very large adult T. rex body plan | Slower, decelerating growth and a smaller mature size in published models | Predictions depend on age assignments and specimen selection |
| Skull architecture | Differences that disappear as the skull grows | A persistent combination of fenestra, maxilla, lacrimal, orbit, jugal and skull-roof characters | No single skull feature is diagnostic by itself |
| Dentition | Tooth count and shape changing through growth | Higher tooth-position counts and distinctive tooth proportions in proposed specimens | Tooth number can vary during growth and preservation can hide teeth |
| Phylogeny | Small specimens nested within Tyrannosaurus | Nanotyrannus outside Tyrannosauridae in the 2025 combined analysis | Results depend on character coding and taxon sampling |
What the 2025 analysis added
The major advance was integration. Earlier arguments often emphasized one category, such as tooth counts or histology. The 2025 work combined several independent tests and examined 120 tyrannosaur specimens firsthand for its phylogenetic dataset. It also used longitudinal growth models and ontogenetic character analysis, allowing the authors to distinguish traits that change with age from traits that separate lineages.
Its conclusion is not that every small tyrannosaur in a museum drawer belongs to Nanotyrannus. Identification remains specimen-specific. Instead, the analysis argues that the named Nanotyrannus material forms a mature, anatomically coherent group that cannot be explained as juvenile members of T. rex.
A practical identification workflow
When a new small tyrannosaur specimen is discovered, a responsible identification would proceed in stages rather than jumping from size to a name.
- Document the specimen and its geology. Record the element, locality, rock unit, stratigraphic position and preservation. Geological context constrains which species could have lived there but does not identify the animal by itself.
- Assess completeness and distortion. Photograph and scan the bones, correct for crushing where possible and mark which measurements are reliable. A distorted skull can create artificial differences in fenestra position or orbital shape.
- Test maturity. Examine bone microstructure, surface texture, vertebral fusion and joint development. The first decision is whether the animal was still growing rapidly, approaching maturity or fully mature.
- Measure the growth fit. Compare dimensions with documented Tyrannosaurus growth trajectories and with models proposed for Nanotyrannus. Check whether the specimen can reach the adult size and proportions expected for either hypothesis without an implausible growth rate.
- Score the anatomy. Record skull, jaw, tooth, vertebral and limb characters in a standardized matrix. Use the complete combination, not a single tooth row or horn.
- Run a phylogenetic analysis. Include close tyrannosaur relatives and test whether the specimen consistently nests with Tyrannosaurus, with Nanotyrannus or elsewhere. Re-run analyses with reasonable changes in coding and taxon sampling to identify unstable results.
Only after these steps should researchers decide whether a specimen extends a known growth series, represents a distinct species or is too incomplete for a confident assignment.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Why size alone fails
Body size is an observation, not a diagnosis. A juvenile of a giant species can be smaller than an adult of a smaller species, and sexual or individual variation can widen the overlap. Fossils may also represent different body regions or be distorted by burial.
Best Value
- 5-in-1 Connectivity: Equipped with a 4K HDMI port, a 5 Gbps USB-C data port, two 5 Gbps USB-A ports, and a USB C 100W PD-IN port. Note: The USB C 100W PD-IN port supports only charging and does not support data transfer devices such as headphones or speakers.
- Powerful Pass-Through Charging: Supports up to 85W pass-through charging so you can power up your laptop while you use the hub. Note: Pass-through charging requires a charger (not included). Note: To achieve full power for iPad, we recommend using a 45W wall charger.
- Transfer Files in Seconds: Move files to and from your laptop at speeds of up to 5 Gbps via the USB-C and USB-A data ports. Note: The USB C 5Gbps Data port does not support video output.
- HD Display: Connect to the HDMI port to stream or mirror content to an external monitor in resolutions of up to 4K@30Hz. Note: The USB-C ports do not support video output.
- What You Get: Anker 332 USB-C Hub (5-in-1), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service.
Size becomes informative when combined with a mature growth signal and a matching anatomical package. If a small skull is fully grown, has a distinctive set of jaw and orbital characters, carries a separate tooth pattern and occupies a different branch on an evolutionary tree, the “young T. rex” explanation must account for all of those observations at once.
How to interpret the 2020 and 2025 studies together
The 2020 osteohistological result should not be dismissed simply because a newer paper reached a different taxonomic conclusion. It provides a clear example of how bone tissue can support the juvenile hypothesis when interpreted as active growth. The 2025 analysis instead argues that the relevant specimens show maturity or near-maturity when histology is considered with skeletal anatomy, growth models and phylogeny.
Conflicting studies can arise from different specimens, sampled bones, age models, character definitions and assumptions about which fossils belong to the same growth series. The scientific issue is therefore testable: additional well-preserved specimens, especially those combining diagnostic skulls with histologically sampled limb bones, can strengthen or weaken either interpretation.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallOutdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWhat “two species” means
Under the 2025 classification, N. lancensis and N. lethaeus are separate species within Nanotyrannus. Species-level naming requires more than finding two sizes. The taxa must show repeatable differences that are not better explained by age, sex, deformation or individual variation, and those differences must fit an evolutionary analysis.
The names should therefore be applied cautiously to incomplete fossils. A partial jaw with a high tooth count may be consistent with Nanotyrannus, but without enough anatomy or developmental evidence it may not be possible to assign it confidently to one of the two species.
What remains uncertain
- The fossil record contains gaps, so the growth series for both Tyrannosaurus and Nanotyrannus is not continuous.
- Histological interpretations can differ with the bone chosen, the section examined and the criteria used for maturity.
- Growth models produce estimates rather than direct adult weights and can change when new specimens or revised ages are added.
- Some skull characters vary during development, making ontogenetic analysis essential.
- Phylogenetic results can be sensitive to how characters are coded and which tyrannosaur relatives are included.
These limits do not make the question unanswerable. They explain why the strongest conclusion comes from agreement among independent lines of evidence rather than from a single measurement.
Bottom line for identifying the fossils
According to the leading 2025 analysis, Nanotyrannus is a distinct tyrannosaur lineage, represented by N. lancensis and N. lethaeus, rather than a juvenile stage of Tyrannosaurus rex. Scientists distinguish them by asking whether the small animal was mature, whether its growth trajectory matches T. rex, whether its skull and teeth form a persistent character combination and where it falls in a phylogenetic tree. Size, tooth count or one unusual skull feature can suggest a hypothesis, but the diagnosis depends on the whole anatomical and developmental record.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
