iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Scale PostgreSQL by matching each technique to the bottleneck it addresses: use read replicas for eligible read traffic, connection pooling to control how application clients consume database connections, and caching or materialized views to avoid repeating work. These tools complement one another, but none automatically increases write capacity or fixes inefficient queries. Start by measuring where the system is constrained, then choose the smallest change that meets your freshness, availability, and capacity requirements.
What does it mean to scale PostgreSQL?
Scaling is not a single switch. A PostgreSQL service can be limited by expensive queries, too many concurrent connections, CPU or storage pressure, a read-heavy workload, or the need to keep serving traffic during a failure. A replica, pooler, and cache affect different parts of that picture. Treating them as interchangeable can add operational complexity without relieving the actual bottleneck.
A useful first step is to establish a baseline: identify the slow or frequent queries, observe active and waiting connections, and determine whether the pressure comes mainly from reads, writes, or both. Also record the freshness the application requires. A dashboard that can tolerate a delay may be a candidate for a replica or periodically refreshed result; a balance or order status immediately following a write may need a fresher read path.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
| Tool | What it changes | What it does not guarantee |
|---|---|---|
| Read replica | Moves eligible read queries to a standby that replays changes from the primary. | Fresh, read-after-write results; write capacity; or uninterrupted service during failover. |
| Connection pooler | Reuses a smaller set of PostgreSQL server connections for application clients. | Query load balancing, automatic failover, or faster individual queries. |
| Cache or materialized view | Reuses stored data or query results instead of repeating database work. | Automatic freshness, correct invalidation, or lower load for queries that are not repeated. |
These distinctions shape the design: improve the query or schema when the work itself is inefficient; pool connections when connection consumption is the issue; offload reads only when their consistency needs permit it; and cache or persist results only when the saved computation is worth the freshness and maintenance trade-off.
#1 Best Overall
- Powerful Turbo Fan:CAGIWIRU Electric Air Duster have reached speed up to 130000RPM,Can efficient remove dust and debris.With LED light and Three Adjustable Speed to meet with different cleaning tasks.
- With Attached USB C Fasting Charging cable.Charing 3 hours,Enjoy up to 240 minutes of use on the lowest setting, For third speed can use for 25mins.with four charging options to meet with your needs.
- Wide Application:Upgraded attached 5 different nozzles,making it suitable for a variety of scenes, such as car,pet, pc, keyboards, and other electronic devices. It also serves for office and home clean duster.
- Handy Design & Portable:Cordless air duster electric nozzle is Light weight and small size, design and comfortable to hold and space saving, convenient to carry around. You can put it in your room or inside the car without taking up space.
- Warranty & Support: Our Electric air duster comes with 5 years warranty and 24/7 customer service. During this period, if you have any questions,pls kindly feel free to contact us.
How do PostgreSQL read replicas work?
In PostgreSQL streaming replication, a primary sends write-ahead log (WAL) records to standby servers as the records are generated. A standby replays those changes and, when configured for hot standby, accepts read-only queries. It is not a second writable primary. PostgreSQL 18 documentation says streaming replication is asynchronous by default, so a commit on the primary can precede visibility of that change on a standby.
The PostgreSQL 18 manual describes replication delay as typically under one second when the standby is powerful enough to keep up. That is a qualified description, not a promise for a particular database, network, or workload. A busy standby, network disruption, or heavy replay load can change the lag. Applications should treat freshness as a measured and monitored property, not assume that a replica is always current.
Choose reads by freshness requirement
Read replicas are suitable for reads whose results can tolerate the replica’s current replay position. Examples may include reports, analytics, or browsing data where a short delay is acceptable, provided the application’s actual requirements allow it. A read that must reflect a just-completed write should stay on the primary unless the application has a consistency strategy that verifies the required change is visible before using the standby.
Route by the meaning of the operation, not merely by whether its SQL begins with SELECT. A sequence such as “write a record, then display that record” has a read-after-write requirement even though the second statement is a read. Keep related reads on the primary when needed, or design an explicit application policy for when a replica is safe. Do not silently send all reads to a replica and leave users to discover stale results.
Understand hot standby limits and query conflicts
Hot standby connections are strictly read-only; the PostgreSQL 17 manual notes that even temporary tables cannot be written through those connections. In addition, replaying WAL can conflict with a long-running query on a standby—for example, when replay work needs to remove row versions that the query is still using. Depending on configuration and circumstances, PostgreSQL may delay replay or cancel the conflicting query.
Rank #2
- Screen Cleaner is Your Screen’s New Bestfriend! - EVEO is proud to present a screen cleaner that’s perfectly suited for your TV. Meet your new screen cleaner, computer screen cleaner, laptop cleaner, iPad cleaner, Macbook,tv cleaner or any other electronic device. Our screen cleaner spray and wipe along with the included plush microfiber cloth, easily removes dust, fingerprints & other smudges on the screen’s surface. Clean effectively for a streak-free screen
- Gentle on your Screens - Our screen cleaner spray and wipes is compatible to be used even for the most sensitive LCD, LED, CRT, and OLED screens in proper use. Be at ease knowing that this product is compatible with all the major brands: LG, SONY, Samsung, Sharp, iPad, iPhone, Android screens, Kindle, PC monitors - we’ve got you covered! Can be used as LCD screen cleaner, tv cleaner, smart tv screen cleaner, and more
- Premium Super Soft Plush Microfiber Cloth - Included in this efficient screen cleaning kit. This screen cleaner spray and wipe has our signature plush microfiber cloth specially designed to comply with screens and monitors and leave them streak-free. Has been shown to effectively absorbs stubborn stains, zero streaks, and no fiber shedding. Always use this together with our screen cleaner for the best results
- Easy-to-Use Screen Cleaner Kit + microfiber cleaning cloth - The EVEO Screen Cleaning Kit will easily be your new favorite tool when it comes to taking care of the things you love most, quick and easy solution for a streak-free screen. Simply screw on the sprayer gun on the screen cleaner bottle. Spray the cleaning liquid onto the microfiber cloth, then wipe the screen until desired cleanliness & shine is achieved.
- Quality Screen Care Kit Worth Purchasing - Enjoy a convenient Screen Cleaner anytime, anywhere you need it. Your satisfaction is our top priority. We stand behind the quality of our products and that’s why, you shouldn’t be worrying at all. We manufacture the Best Screen Cleaner. and can be used for laptop cleaning kit, laptop screen cleaner, tv screen cleaner for smart tv. MacBook screen cleaner, monitor cleaner or screen cleaner spray for electronic devices with microfiber cleaning cloth
This makes query duration and cancellation behavior part of replica design. Keep replica queries bounded where possible, monitor cancellations and replay delay, and decide how the application responds when a read is cancelled. Policies that let queries delay replay trade fresher reads for potentially growing lag; policies that prioritize replay may interrupt reads. Neither choice is universally right. It depends on the read workload and the maximum lag the service can tolerate.
Plan for lag, failure, and recovery
Asynchronous replication reduces how tightly primary commits depend on standby acknowledgement, but it leaves a window in which a primary failure and promotion can lose changes that had not reached the promoted standby. Synchronous replication can make commits wait for standby confirmation, improving protection against losing acknowledged data in failover scenarios, but it couples commit latency and availability to standby and network conditions. PostgreSQL 16 high-availability guidance frames these as trade-offs rather than offering a universal performance setting. Choose based on service objectives and test the actual failure and promotion path.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteA standby also depends on receiving the WAL it needs. If it falls behind until required WAL has been recycled, it may need to recover from an archive or be reinitialized. Plan WAL archiving, retention or replication slots, disk capacity, lag monitoring, and documented recovery procedures. Replication is not a backup: it can reproduce unwanted changes as well as wanted ones, and it does not replace a separately managed backup and restore plan.
| Choice | Commit behavior | Main trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Asynchronous replication | Primary commits do not normally wait for standby confirmation. | Less commit coupling, but a lag and potential loss window if a standby is promoted after primary failure. |
| Synchronous replication | Commits can wait for standby confirmation according to the configured policy. | Can improve acknowledged-write protection in failover, but makes latency and availability more sensitive to the standby and network. |
The choice in this table concerns replication and failover behavior; it does not by itself determine which reads the application should route to a standby.
How do I use connection pooling with PostgreSQL?
Each direct application connection consumes a PostgreSQL server connection. If many application workers open connections independently, connection count can become a constraint even when those clients are not all doing useful database work at once. A pooler accepts client connections and reuses a bounded set of server connections. That can control database connection consumption, but it does not make a slow query cheaper or decide which host receives a query.
Rank #3
- 【Large size】：Measuring 800 x 300 mm/ 31. 5×12 inches, which is wider and taller than others. Large mouse pad can perfectly fit your keyboard and mouse of any size, and there is also ample space for peripherals such as phones, tablets, etc.
- 【LED backlight mouse pad】：Blade Hawks RGB mouse pad provides 7 static modes and 7 dynamic modes will give you the options you are looking for. Power-off memory function remembers the last lighting mode you selected. The super glow fiber Chroma will give you a colorful gaming setup that you want.
- 【Anti-slip rubber base】：Made from Natural rubber, this gaming mousepad will firmly grip your desktop, allowing you to enjoy the ultimate precision in the games you are most passionate about. It also comes with a texture that enhances this ability even further.
- 【Smooth and waterproof surface】: Micro-textured cloth surface, for extremely precise mouse control and a smooth movement. When liquid splashes on the gaming mouse pad, it forms water droplets and slides down. Will not delay your work or gameplay.
- 【Plug and play】: This mouse and keyboard pad is powered by USB, plug and play, no driver required. One button control light modes. Press one time to change the lighting mode, press twice to change the brightness, press and hold about 3 seconds turn ON/OFF.
PgBouncer is a commonly used PostgreSQL connection pooler. Its official configuration documentation lists defaults such as default_pool_size of 20 and max_client_conn of 100 on the reviewed configuration page. These are configuration defaults, not recommended targets for every service. Settings vary by configuration and version, and the right server-connection budget depends on the database’s capacity and the complete deployment.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Choose the pooling mode around application behavior
PgBouncer offers session, transaction, and statement pooling. The key difference is how long one client retains a PostgreSQL server connection. The more frequently the connection can be returned for reuse, the more important it is that the application not rely on session state persisting on the same backend.
| Mode | When a server connection is held | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Session | For the lifetime of the client session. | Preserves session-oriented PostgreSQL behavior, but offers less sharing when clients remain connected while idle. |
| Transaction | For a transaction; it is returned to the pool after the transaction ends. | Allows server connections to be reused across clients between transactions, but breaks some session-based features. |
| Statement | For a single query. | Releases the server connection after each query and does not allow multi-statement transactions. |
Transaction pooling is often the mode readers mean when they ask about pooling many short-lived application operations, but it changes the assumptions the application can make. PgBouncer’s features documentation explicitly warns that transaction pooling breaks some session-based PostgreSQL features. Its compatibility table marks uses such as SET/RESET, LISTEN, session-level advisory locks, and PREPARE/DEALLOCATE as incompatible in transaction mode. Prepared-protocol support has specific conditions, so check the current compatibility page for the PgBouncer version and driver in use rather than assuming all prepared statements behave alike.
Roll out a pooler safely
- Inventory connection behavior. Find out whether the application relies on session settings, temporary objects, listeners, advisory locks, prepared statements, or multi-statement transactions. Map which operations need a session-affine backend.
- Select a mode. Use session pooling when compatibility with session-oriented behavior is necessary. Consider transaction pooling only after the application and driver have been checked against the relevant PgBouncer compatibility documentation. Statement pooling is appropriate only when the application can operate without multi-statement transactions.
- Set a total connection budget. Count pooler instances, application instances, and separate pools together. Configure server connection limits so the aggregate fits the database’s available connection capacity; do not treat the pooler’s default size as a performance target.
- Test realistic behavior before production. Exercise transaction boundaries, error handling, reconnects, and every session-dependent feature the application uses. Verify the precise driver and PgBouncer versions involved.
- Observe under load and adjust. Track waiting clients, active server connections, transaction duration, and database saturation. A pool that is too restrictive can make clients wait; a permissive aggregate budget can simply move the connection pressure back to PostgreSQL.
Pooling settings are limits, not throughput promises. The PgBouncer documents do not establish the correct pool size for a particular service; choose it from observed concurrency, transaction duration, and database capacity.
Do not confuse pooling with routing or failover
PgBouncer is a pooler, not a complete read-routing or high-availability layer. Its FAQ says it does not provide internal multi-host configuration or failover-host detection. If the application reads from replicas or needs to follow a promoted primary, another component—such as application logic, service discovery, or a separate routing and HA layer—must supply that behavior.
Recommended Free Tools
Rank #4
- 【Softer and More Comfortable】Vaydeer wrist rest has unique diamond pattern, which is the combination of softness and aesthetics. The materials of wrist rest are improved into higher quality memory foam and covered with silky smooth lycra. The computer wrist rest makes you as comfortable and cushiony as like rest your wrists on clouds.
- 【Ergonomic Wrist Saver】The wrist rests for keyboard and mouse comes with a 17.32×3.15×0.83 inch keyboard wrist pad and a 5.94×3.15×0.83 inch mouse wrist support. Based on ergonomic design, the unique concave shape is the perfect fit for your wrist joints. The wrist rest pad fits most computer keyboards and laptops, improve hand and wrist posture, release your wrist and arm stress.
- 【Non-Slip Rubber Bottom】Featuring an anti-skid silicone base on the bottom, this wrist keyboard support stays firmly in place on your desk, preventing the padding from sliding around, ensuring stable and consistent wrist support during extended computer sessions.
- 【Better Experience & Pain Relief】Our keyboard arm rest is beneficial to alleviate the soreness caused by direct contact and friction between your arm and a hard desk surface, reducing the risk of wrist fatigue or carpal tunnel. The soft texture of memory foam can evenly distribute the pressure around your wrists and provide good support with just enough give.
- 【Helpful in Multiple Scenarios】Whether you're working, studying, writing, typing, gaming, this keyboard and mouse rest combo is an essential accessory to add comfort and support to your hands and wrists. It’s also a great gift for men, women, family, friend, coworker, gamer, teacher, etc.
Test what happens to existing and new connections during promotion, including how clients discover the new primary and how stale or failed connections are handled. A pooler can manage connections to the host it has been given; it does not make a replica writable, decide whether a read is fresh enough, or guarantee that traffic moves to the right server after a failure.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.How can caching reduce repeated PostgreSQL work?
Caching is useful when the same data or computation is requested repeatedly and the service can define how fresh the result must be. PostgreSQL already keeps data pages in memory: it uses shared_buffers for database shared memory and also relies on the operating system’s cache. That page caching can reduce storage reads, but it does not necessarily avoid recomputing an expensive aggregate, join, or other query result.
PostgreSQL 18 documentation gives “25% of the memory in your system” as a reasonable starting point for shared_buffers on a dedicated database server with at least 1 GB of RAM. The same guidance says allocating more than 40% of RAM is unlikely to work better in typical circumstances. These are official starting points, not universal ratios or a reason to change a working system without measurement. Tune for the workload and observe memory, query behavior, and operating-system caching effects.
Use materialized views for repeatable computations
A materialized view stores the result of a query in a table-like form. Queries can read that stored result rather than rerun the underlying computation, and REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW regenerates it. The PostgreSQL 17 documentation describes the mechanism; it is persisted query output, not a transparent cache that refreshes itself whenever source rows change.
This can suit summaries or other computations whose refresh schedule meets the application’s freshness requirements. Before using one, identify what data it represents, when it is refreshed, how readers behave while a refresh is due, and how much delay users can accept. A more frequent refresh may reduce staleness but uses database resources to recompute results; a less frequent refresh saves refresh work but exposes older data for longer.
Best Value
- 【No Drill Mounted】Cable management tray can be assembled in as little as 3 minutes or less-simply. Side clips easily clampe the edge of desk, pass through the holes on the sides, and secure excess cables with baskets. Desk cable management supports inward or outward installation to meet your needs in different scenarios, and provides you with great convenience when collecting and organizing wires.
- 【Rubber Pad Protects Desk】Wire organizer under desk built-in soft rubber pads on the clamp protect your desk from scratches, so you will not damage your furniture or office.
- 【Sturdy and Beautiful】Cord management under desk is made of high-quality carbon steel and holds about 15 lbs. The wire basket has 2 holes on each side of the tray to enable your cables to pass freely. Cable baskets are suitable for desk thickness use from 0.4" to 2.4".
- 【Space Saving & Keep Organized】Desk cable management tray holds all your power cords, outlet strips, USB hubs and computer transformers hidden from your feet, and the data cables will not enter the vacuum cleaner to keep your desk clean and tidy. Desk wire organizer is also suitable for use in the kitchen and outdoors.
- 【Reduce Safety Risks】Cable tray under desk keeps all plugs away from your kids, no more worry about tripping. Using 2 holes wire tray saves extra space, helps you easily cabling and wire protection. The mesh design is not easy to accumulate dust, but avoids safety accidents caused by messy wires.
Materialized views and shared buffers solve different problems. Shared buffers and the operating-system cache reuse data pages; a materialized view persists a computed result. The latter can avoid repeated query computation, but introduces refresh scheduling and stored-result management. Choose based on whether the expensive part is fetching pages or repeating the computation.
Set cache rules before introducing an application cache
An application cache can serve repeated results without asking PostgreSQL each time, but correctness depends on an explicit freshness and invalidation policy. Define which reads may return older data, how writes invalidate or update affected entries, and what happens when a cached value expires. If many requests miss or expire together, a cache stampede can send a burst of duplicate work back to the database; coordinate refreshes or otherwise limit that repeated work.
Decide how the application behaves when the cache is unavailable. It may fall back to PostgreSQL, serve a known stale value, or fail the request; each option has different correctness and load consequences. Test the fallback so cache failure does not unexpectedly overwhelm the database. PostgreSQL’s manuals explain database caching and materialized views, but do not identify a specific external cache product or strategy as suitable for every workload.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →How should the three techniques fit together?
Use a layered design only when each layer has a clear job and a safe fallback. Pooling can protect PostgreSQL from an excessive number of backend connections; a replica can absorb reads that tolerate replica freshness; a cache or materialized view can suppress repeated reads or computation. One layer does not remove the need to understand the next: a replica still needs routing, a pooler still needs a connection budget, and cached results still need freshness rules.
- Fix work that should not be repeated. Determine whether query behavior itself is inefficient before adding infrastructure. Replicas and pools do not make an unnecessarily expensive query efficient.
- Control connection consumption. If connection count is the constraint, introduce pooling with a mode compatible with application semantics and a measured aggregate server-connection budget.
- Classify read paths. Separate reads that require primary freshness from those that can tolerate lag. Route the latter to a standby only with monitoring and a plan for replica unavailability.
- Identify repeatable work. If the same result is requested often, compare page caching, a materialized view, and an application cache. Select the mechanism whose refresh or invalidation behavior fits the data’s freshness requirement.
- Test degraded operation. Simulate lag, a cancelled standby query, a lost replica, pool saturation, cache unavailability, and primary promotion. Confirm that the application responds with the intended consistency and failure behavior.
- Re-measure. Compare the original bottleneck indicators with behavior after each change. Keep a technique only if it improves the relevant constraint without violating freshness or availability objectives.
A read-heavy reporting workload may benefit from a standby plus precomputed summaries, while a connection-heavy service may first need pooling. A write-bound workload is different: read replicas do not accept writes, and the techniques discussed here do not automatically raise write throughput. That workload calls for diagnosis of its write path rather than indiscriminate addition of read infrastructure.
What should you monitor after scaling?
Monitor the symptom each mechanism is meant to control, along with the new failure modes it introduces. Trends matter more than a single snapshot: compare normal and peak periods, and tie operational alerts to the freshness and service objectives you have selected.
- Replicas: replication lag and WAL replay progress; standby availability; read-query cancellations; and whether required WAL remains available through retention, slots, or archives.
- Pooling: waiting clients, active server connections, transaction duration, and database saturation. Rising waits can indicate a pool limit or long-held transaction; simply raising the limit can increase database connection pressure.
- Materialized views and application caches: result age, refresh or invalidation success, refresh resource use, cache misses, and fallback load during cache failure.
- Overall service: the original slow-query and workload indicators, plus correctness checks for operations that need read-after-write behavior.
Monitoring should lead to an operational action: for example, investigate a standby that cannot keep up, identify transactions holding pooled connections too long, or stop a cache fallback from flooding the primary. Set thresholds from your service’s acceptable lag and capacity, not from an assumption that a documented typical value applies to every deployment.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
