The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Keep a unified database responsive by treating analytics as a governed workload, not merely as a collection of slow queries. Classify reporting sessions, place them in a separate resource group, cap their workers and parallelism, bound per-request memory, control physical I/O where the engine allows it, and monitor those limits alongside OLTP latency. Apply limits gradually using measured capacity and service objectives; there is no workload-independent safe percentage.
What is competing with OLTP traffic?
An analytical query can consume several shared resources at once. Large scans read data pages from storage, joins and aggregations request memory, parallel plans use many workers, and CPU-intensive expressions compete with transaction processing. Even when a report is read-only, it can evict useful pages from cache, increase storage latency, and leave too few workers for short OLTP statements.
The practical objective is not to make every report fast. It is to preserve an agreed OLTP service objective while allowing analytical work to make progress. That requires separate classification and measurable limits for each resource.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches| Resource | How analytics can starve OLTP | Controls to apply |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Parallel scans, joins, sorting, and expression evaluation consume scheduler time. | CPU caps or shares, worker limits, conservative parallelism, and query tuning. |
| Memory | Sorts, hashes, and large grants reduce cache headroom or trigger paging and spills. | Per-request grant limits, scoped work-memory settings, concurrency caps, and plan improvements. |
| Workers | Many parallel branches or queued requests delay short transactions. | Finite analytical concurrency and a lower degree-of-parallelism ceiling. |
| Storage I/O | Full scans and writes generated by temporary work increase latency for transaction reads and writes. | Indexes, partition pruning, current statistics, I/O governance, and workload scheduling. |
| Buffer or cache | Large scans can displace pages frequently used by OLTP. | Reduce scanned data, isolate reporting where possible, and observe cache and read latency. |
Classify analytical sessions before setting limits
Resource controls apply to a class of work, so classification is the first design decision. Use an application name, login or role, service account, reporting endpoint, database or pluggable-database boundary, or a connection-pool label. Do not classify solely by query text if the same statement can be issued by both OLTP and reporting services.
#1 Best Overall
- Powerful Turbo Fan:CAGIWIRU Electric Air Duster have reached speed up to 130000RPM,Can efficient remove dust and debris.With LED light and Three Adjustable Speed to meet with different cleaning tasks.
- With Attached USB C Fasting Charging cable.Charing 3 hours,Enjoy up to 240 minutes of use on the lowest setting, For third speed can use for 25mins.with four charging options to meet with your needs.
- Wide Application: attached 5 different nozzles,making it suitable for a variety of scenes, such as car,pet, pc, keyboards, and other electronic devices. It also serves for office and home clean duster.
- Handy Design & Portable:Cordless air duster electric nozzle is Light weight and small size, design and comfortable to hold and space saving, convenient to carry around. You can put it in your room or inside the car without taking up space.
- Economical &Reusable: Built durable materials with a long-lasting battery,our CAGIWIRU air duster it's a sustainable alternative to disposable air cans.
Build protected and governed classes
- Create a protected OLTP class for interactive transactions, APIs, and jobs with a latency objective.
- Create one or more analytical classes for dashboards, ad-hoc reporting, batch extracts, and data-science workloads. Split them when their runtimes or business priorities differ.
- Make the classifier deterministic and fail closed: an unrecognised reporting connection should not silently enter the protected class, and an unrecognised transaction should not receive reporting limits.
- Record the classification key in connection-pool configuration and deployment documentation so a failover or pool replacement does not change governance.
Classification scope differs by engine. SQL Server uses workload groups and resource pools; PostgreSQL commonly uses roles, databases, and session settings; Oracle uses consumer groups and resource plans; Azure SQL exposes the effective governance values for the database or workload group.
Measure capacity and service objectives first
Capture a baseline during normal mixed traffic and during the busiest reporting window. At minimum, record OLTP latency percentiles, transaction throughput, CPU utilisation and runnable work, memory grants and spills, worker waits, physical reads and write latency, analytical queue time, completion time, cancellations, and errors.
Group the measurements by workload class rather than looking only at instance totals. A low overall CPU percentage can coexist with an OLTP latency incident if workers are blocked, memory grants are queued, or storage latency is high. Conversely, a high CPU reading may be acceptable if the OLTP objective remains within its target and reporting completion time is predictable.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Derive limits from measured headroom, query plans, concurrency, and the OLTP objective. Documentation for the engines does not define a universal safe CPU or memory percentage, so avoid copying a fixed limit from another system.
Bound concurrency and parallelism
Concurrency is the multiplier behind most resource surprises. Ten reports that each look harmless in isolation can exhaust workers or memory when they start together. Set a finite number of analytical requests in the connection pool or workload manager, then cap the parallelism of each request.
Choose a conservative parallelism ceiling
- Start with a lower degree of parallelism for reporting than for protected OLTP, especially when reports scan large tables.
- Test representative mixed concurrency, including several reports starting simultaneously and short transactions arriving during their peak phases.
- Watch queue time as well as execution time. A queue is preferable to allowing all requests to consume workers at once, but an unbounded queue can create unacceptable freshness delays.
- Revisit the ceiling after indexing or partitioning changes; a plan that becomes cheaper may need less parallelism, while a new join strategy may need a different setting.
SQL Server workload-group policies can change the maximum degree of parallelism. Oracle Resource Manager can limit parallel servers and queue parallel queries when a utilization limit is reached. PostgreSQL does not provide an equivalent built-in workload-group worker governor, so cap analytical connections at the pool or connection-management layer.
Bound memory per request without hiding total demand
A per-request memory limit is not a server-wide budget. Several operators in one plan can each allocate memory, and many concurrent plans multiply the demand. Set the limit together with analytical concurrency and verify whether the engine queues, spills, or fails when the limit is reached.
Rank #2
- Screen Cleaner is Your Screen’s New Bestfriend! - EVEO is proud to present a screen cleaner that’s perfectly suited for your TV. Meet your new screen cleaner, computer screen cleaner, laptop cleaner, iPad cleaner, Macbook,tv cleaner or any other electronic device. Our screen cleaner spray and wipe along with the included plush microfiber cloth, easily removes dust, fingerprints & other smudges on the screen’s surface. Clean effectively for a streak-free screen
- Gentle on your Screens - Our screen cleaner spray and wipes is compatible to be used even for the most sensitive LCD, LED, CRT, and OLED screens in proper use. Be at ease knowing that this product is compatible with all the major brands: LG, SONY, Samsung, Sharp, iPad, iPhone, Android screens, Kindle, PC monitors - we’ve got you covered! Can be used as LCD screen cleaner, tv cleaner, smart tv screen cleaner, and more
- Premium Super Soft Plush Microfiber Cloth - Included in this efficient screen cleaning kit. This screen cleaner spray and wipe has our signature plush microfiber cloth specially designed to comply with screens and monitors and leave them streak-free. Has been shown to effectively absorbs stubborn stains, zero streaks, and no fiber shedding. Always use this together with our screen cleaner for the best results
- Easy-to-Use Screen Cleaner Kit + microfiber cleaning cloth - The EVEO Screen Cleaning Kit will easily be your new favorite tool when it comes to taking care of the things you love most, quick and easy solution for a streak-free screen. Simply screw on the sprayer gun on the screen cleaner bottle. Spray the cleaning liquid onto the microfiber cloth, then wipe the screen until desired cleanliness & shine is achieved.
- Quality Screen Care Kit Worth Purchasing - Enjoy a convenient Screen Cleaner anytime, anywhere you need it. Your satisfaction is our top priority. We stand behind the quality of our products and that’s why, you shouldn’t be worrying at all. We manufacture the Best Screen Cleaner. and can be used for laptop cleaning kit, laptop screen cleaner, tv screen cleaner for smart tv. MacBook screen cleaner, monitor cleaner or screen cleaner spray for electronic devices with microfiber cleaning cloth
SQL Server memory grants
SQL Server Resource Governor can assign analytical sessions to a workload group and cap the memory grant available to each request. A representative configuration pattern is:
CREATE RESOURCE POOL [ReportingPool]
WITH (MAX_CPU_PERCENT = 25, MAX_MEMORY_PERCENT = 20);
CREATE WORKLOAD GROUP [ReportingGroup]
USING [ReportingPool]
WITH (MAX_DOP = 2, REQUEST_MAX_MEMORY_GRANT_PERCENT = 10);
ALTER RESOURCE GOVERNOR RECONFIGURE;The values are examples, not universal recommendations. Validate the syntax and available options for the SQL Server edition and version you run. Resource Governor is scoped to the SQL Server Database Engine; it does not govern other instances. Physical-I/O governance also excludes system-task writes such as transaction-log, checkpoint, and lazy-writer I/O.
PostgreSQL work_mem and hash_mem_multiplier
In PostgreSQL, work_mem applies to an individual sort, hash, or similar operation, not to an entire session or server. A single query can contain several such nodes, and concurrent queries multiply their allocations. Hash operations can use work_mem multiplied by hash_mem_multiplier; the PostgreSQL 18 documentation lists a default of 2.0.
Use a role- or session-scoped setting for reporting instead of raising the global value:
Recommended Free Tools
ALTER ROLE reporting SET work_mem = '64MB';
ALTER ROLE reporting SET hash_mem_multiplier = 1.5;
-- For a controlled batch session
SET LOCAL work_mem = '128MB';
SET LOCAL hash_mem_multiplier = 1.5;Choose values after observing spill frequency and concurrent operation counts. Increasing a global setting can produce intermittent out-of-memory events when many reports run together. Keep the connection pool bounded even when each individual query appears to fit in memory.
Oracle memory and parallel execution
Oracle Database Resource Manager uses consumer groups and resource plans to separate reporting from transactional services. Its controls include CPU utilisation limits, parallel-server limits, pluggable-database memory limits, and mechanisms for handling excess disk I/O caused by poorly designed SQL or high-volume scans. Monitor PGA and other memory outcomes, parallel execution, queueing, and I/O for each consumer group rather than relying on instance totals.
Reduce I/O before throttling it
I/O governance protects neighbours, but it does not repair an inefficient plan. First identify scan-heavy statements and check whether predicates are sargable, the required indexes exist, partition pruning occurs, and statistics describe current data distribution. Select only needed columns, avoid repeated extraction of the same history, and materialise or pre-aggregate data when the workload is inherently repetitive.
Rank #3
- 【Large size】：Measuring 800 x 300 mm/ 31. 5×12 inches, which is wider and taller than others. Large mouse pad can perfectly fit your keyboard and mouse of any size, and there is also ample space for peripherals such as phones, tablets, etc.
- 【LED backlight mouse pad】：Blade Hawks RGB mouse pad provides 7 static modes and 7 dynamic modes will give you the options you are looking for. Power-off memory function remembers the last lighting mode you selected. The super glow fiber Chroma will give you a colorful gaming setup that you want.
- 【Anti-slip rubber base】：Made from Natural rubber, this gaming mousepad will firmly grip your desktop, allowing you to enjoy the ultimate precision in the games you are most passionate about. It also comes with a texture that enhances this ability even further.
- 【Smooth and waterproof surface】: Micro-textured cloth surface, for extremely precise mouse control and a smooth movement. When liquid splashes on the gaming mouse pad, it forms water droplets and slides down. Will not delay your work or gameplay.
- 【Plug and play】: This mouse and keyboard pad is powered by USB, plug and play, no driver required. One button control light modes. Press one time to change the lighting mode, press twice to change the brightness, press and hold about 3 seconds turn ON/OFF.
Apply engine limits where available
- SQL Server Resource Governor can limit physical I/O for user query workloads through resource-pool policies. Its physical-I/O control does not cover system-task writes, so transaction-log, checkpoint, and lazy-writer pressure still require capacity planning and monitoring.
- Oracle Resource Manager provides controls for I/O-heavy workloads and can manage excess disk I/O from high-volume scans through consumer-group directives.
- PostgreSQL’s core settings described here focus on memory and do not provide the same built-in per-role physical-I/O cap. Use query design, scheduling, storage isolation, and external pool or operating-system controls where appropriate.
- Azure SQL exposes IOPS and log-rate governance values, but those values describe the service or workload-group limits; query telemetry is still needed to find the statements causing the pressure.
SQL Server: use Resource Governor deliberately
Microsoft describes Resource Governor as allowing administrators to reserve or limit the CPU, memory, and physical I/O that user query workloads can use. Resource pools hold physical resources, workload groups classify sessions, and request policies can alter degree of parallelism and memory grants.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Implementation sequence
- Define a classifier function using stable session attributes such as application name, login, or service account.
- Create a reporting resource pool with measured CPU and memory ceilings, and a workload group that points to it.
- Set a finite
MAX_DOPand a request memory-grant ceiling for the reporting group. - Add an I/O cap only after confirming the edition, volume layout, and operational effect of the setting.
- Reconfigure during a controlled window, verify that new sessions enter the intended group, and test failover behavior.
- Apply the same Resource Governor configuration on every instance hosting an availability-group replica. Configuration does not automatically propagate to secondary replicas.
Do not assume a Resource Governor policy protects workloads on another SQL Server instance, a linked server, or an external analytics service. Those require their own governance boundary.
PostgreSQL: prevent multiplicative memory growth
The most common mistake is treating work_mem as a per-query budget. PostgreSQL allocates it per operation, so a plan with multiple sort and hash nodes can consume several allocations before concurrency is considered. Hash nodes may use the multiplied amount determined by hash_mem_multiplier.
Safer operating pattern
- Create a dedicated reporting role and route reporting connections through a pool with a maximum size.
- Set role-level
work_memandhash_mem_multipliervalues that fit the measured concurrency envelope. - Use a higher
SET LOCALvalue only for a controlled statement or batch whose plan and concurrency are known. - Inspect execution plans for spills, excessive hash batches, and scans before increasing memory.
- Keep OLTP roles at conservative settings and prevent reporting clients from overriding them unintentionally.
If the system experiences intermittent out-of-memory events after a memory increase, lower the scoped value or pool size first; raising server memory without reducing multiplicative demand can merely postpone the failure.
Oracle Database: govern consumer groups and parallel work
Define consumer groups that reflect business service levels, then map reporting sessions to a reporting group and transactional sessions to a protected group. A resource plan can assign CPU utilisation limits, restrict parallel servers, queue parallel requests when the limit is reached, and impose memory limits at the pluggable-database level.
For I/O-heavy reports, combine consumer-group directives with plan and data-layout improvements. Monitor CPU, PGA or other memory pressure, parallel execution queues, physical reads, storage latency, and the effect on transactional groups. A limit that merely makes every report slower without reducing queueing or OLTP impact is not a successful policy.
Azure SQL: verify the effective governance values
Azure SQL exposes governance values through sys.dm_user_db_resource_governance. Query the view when validating a database or workload-group configuration:
Rank #4
- 【Softer and More Comfortable】Vaydeer wrist rest has unique diamond pattern, which is the combination of softness and aesthetics. The materials of wrist rest are improved into higher quality memory foam and covered with silky smooth lycra. The computer wrist rest makes you as comfortable and cushiony as like rest your wrists on clouds.
- 【Ergonomic Wrist Saver】The wrist rests for keyboard and mouse comes with a 17.32×3.15×0.83 inch keyboard wrist pad and a 5.94×3.15×0.83 inch mouse wrist support. Based on ergonomic design, the unique concave shape is the perfect fit for your wrist joints. The wrist rest pad fits most computer keyboards and laptops, improve hand and wrist posture, release your wrist and arm stress.
- 【Non-Slip Rubber Bottom】Featuring an anti-skid silicone base on the bottom, this wrist keyboard support stays firmly in place on your desk, preventing the padding from sliding around, ensuring stable and consistent wrist support during extended computer sessions.
- 【Better Experience & Pain Relief】Our keyboard arm rest is beneficial to alleviate the soreness caused by direct contact and friction between your arm and a hard desk surface, reducing the risk of wrist fatigue or carpal tunnel. The soft texture of memory foam can evenly distribute the pressure around your wrists and provide good support with just enough give.
- 【Helpful in Multiple Scenarios】Whether you're working, studying, writing, typing, gaming, this keyboard and mouse rest combo is an essential accessory to add comfort and support to your hands and wrists. It’s also a great gift for men, women, family, friend, coworker, gamer, teacher, etc.
SELECT
cpu_limit,
max_cpu,
max_dop,
max_memory_grant,
primary_group_max_io,
primary_group_max_workers,
log_rate_limit
FROM sys.dm_user_db_resource_governance;The view includes CPU, memory-grant, worker, IOPS, and log-rate limits, including fields such as cpu_limit, max_cpu, max_dop, max_memory_grant, primary_group_max_io, and primary_group_max_workers. These values tell you what governance is configured for the database or workload group; they are not a replacement for query-level telemetry, wait analysis, execution plans, or OLTP latency measurements.
Roll out controls in stages
- Observe. Tag sessions and collect class-level CPU, memory grants and spills, worker use, read IOPS and throughput, storage latency, queueing, cancellations, and OLTP service metrics without changing limits.
- Validate classification. Confirm that every reporting connection lands in the reporting class and that protected transactions are not misclassified.
- Apply soft constraints. Start with a finite pool size and conservative parallelism. Use alerting and queue visibility before adding aggressive caps.
- Test mixed concurrency. Replay representative reports while normal transactions run. Include peak arrival bursts, long scans, memory-heavy joins, and cancellation or timeout behavior.
- Tighten one dimension at a time. Adjust CPU, workers, memory, or I/O separately so a change can be tied to an observed outcome.
- Document recovery. Define how to pause a report class, reduce its pool size, or temporarily restore a previous policy when OLTP objectives are breached.
Monitoring signals and alert design
Build dashboards by workload class. For OLTP, alert on latency percentiles, lock and worker waits, transaction throughput, and error or timeout rates. For analytics, track queue time, elapsed time, CPU time, memory-grant waits, spill volume, worker consumption, physical reads, IOPS, throughput, cancellations, and completion freshness.
Correlate a report’s start time with changes in OLTP latency. A limit is useful only if it changes that relationship predictably. For example, a lower parallelism ceiling may increase report duration but reduce worker starvation; a memory-grant cap may create spills but keep the buffer cache and transaction latency stable. Decide whether that trade-off meets the service objective before tuning further.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Common failure modes and fixes
All reports share one unrestricted pool
Symptom: A single dashboard refresh causes broad latency spikes. Fix: classify reporting sessions and assign them a bounded pool or consumer group with finite concurrency.
Global memory settings are raised to stop spills
Symptom: Spills decline, but concurrent reports trigger memory pressure or out-of-memory failures. Fix: scope memory settings to reporting roles or groups, inspect plans, and reduce concurrent sessions before increasing per-operation memory.
Parallelism is reduced without addressing scan volume
Symptom: Reports take longer while storage remains saturated. Fix: improve predicates, indexes, partition pruning, statistics, and selected columns, then retest the parallelism ceiling.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
I/O caps are expected to protect system writes
Symptom: Transaction-log or checkpoint pressure continues despite a user-I/O limit. Fix: account for the documented scope of the control, monitor system-task writes separately, and address storage capacity and write patterns.
Best Value
- 【No Drill Mounted】Cable management tray can be assembled in as little as 3 minutes or less-simply. Side clips easily clampe the edge of desk, pass through the holes on the sides, and secure excess cables with baskets. Desk cable management supports inward or outward installation to meet your needs in different scenarios, and provides you with great convenience when collecting and organizing wires.
- 【Rubber Pad Protects Desk】Wire organizer under desk built-in soft rubber pads on the clamp protect your desk from scratches, so you will not damage your furniture or office.
- 【Sturdy and Beautiful】Cord management under desk is made of high-quality carbon steel and holds about 15 lbs. The wire basket has 2 holes on each side of the tray to enable your cables to pass freely. Cable baskets are suitable for desk thickness use from 0.4" to 2.4".
- 【Space Saving & Keep Organized】Desk cable management tray holds all your power cords, outlet strips, USB hubs and computer transformers hidden from your feet, and the data cables will not enter the vacuum cleaner to keep your desk clean and tidy. Desk wire organizer is also suitable for use in the kitchen and outdoors.
- 【Reduce Safety Risks】Cable tray under desk keeps all plugs away from your kids, no more worry about tripping. Using 2 holes wire tray saves extra space, helps you easily cabling and wire protection. The mesh design is not easy to accumulate dust, but avoids safety accidents caused by messy wires.
Replica behavior differs after failover
Symptom: The primary is governed but a promoted replica is not. Fix: keep governance configuration consistent on every eligible instance and test failover as part of rollout.
Engine comparison
| Engine or service | Classification boundary | CPU and workers | Memory | I/O and observability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQL Server Database Engine | Classifier function, workload groups, and resource pools. | Pool CPU limits and workload-group MAX_DOP; worker concurrency must still be observed. |
Request memory-grant policies. | Physical-I/O governance for user operations; system-task writes excluded. Configuration must be consistent across availability-group instances. |
| PostgreSQL | Roles, databases, sessions, and external connection pools. | Use pool-level concurrency and query settings; no equivalent built-in workload-group governor is described here. | work_mem per operation; hash operations multiply it by hash_mem_multiplier, whose documented default is 2.0 in PostgreSQL 18. |
Rely on plan tuning, scheduling, storage controls, and telemetry for I/O pressure. |
| Oracle Database | Consumer groups and resource plans, including pluggable-database boundaries. | CPU utilisation limits, parallel-server limits, and queuing of parallel work. | PDB memory limits plus monitoring of PGA and execution outcomes. | Resource Manager controls for I/O-heavy workloads and consumer-group monitoring. |
| Azure SQL | Database and workload-group governance exposed by the service. | CPU, MAXDOP, and worker limits are exposed through the governance DMV. | Maximum memory-grant values are exposed through the governance DMV. | IOPS and log-rate values are exposed through the governance DMV; query telemetry remains necessary. |
Operational checklist
- Every connection has a reliable workload classification.
- OLTP and analytical sessions have separate governance policies.
- Analytical connection pools have a finite maximum size.
- Parallelism is capped and tested under mixed concurrency.
- Memory limits account for per-operation allocation and concurrent queries.
- Scan-heavy plans have been checked for predicates, indexes, pruning, and statistics.
- I/O controls are understood, including exclusions for system-task writes.
- Dashboards show CPU, memory, workers, I/O, queueing, cancellations, and OLTP objectives by class.
- Failover and replica instances carry equivalent governance where required.
- Limits are changed in stages and tied to measured capacity rather than a copied percentage.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is lowering analytical parallelism enough to protect OLTP?
No. It can reduce worker and CPU contention, but scans may still saturate storage and memory grants can still cause pressure. Pair a parallelism ceiling with bounded concurrency, scoped memory limits, query-plan improvements, and I/O monitoring.
Why can PostgreSQL use more memory than the work_mem value suggests?
work_mem applies to each sort, hash, or similar operation, not an entire query. A plan can contain several operations, concurrent queries multiply those allocations, and hash operations can use work_mem multiplied by hash_mem_multiplier.
Should I set the same limits on every SQL Server availability-group replica?
Yes. Resource Governor configuration does not automatically propagate to secondary replicas, so keep policies consistent on every instance that could become primary or serve user workload.
Does Azure SQL’s governance DMV show which query caused a spike?
No. sys.dm_user_db_resource_governance reports configured CPU, memory-grant, worker, IOPS, and log-rate values. Use query telemetry, execution plans, waits, and class-level latency to identify the workload causing pressure.
What is a safe CPU or memory percentage for reporting?
There is no universal safe value. Select limits from measured capacity, query plans, concurrency, storage behavior, and the latency or throughput objective for OLTP, then validate them with mixed-workload tests.
The Bottom Line
Protect OLTP by classifying analytical sessions, bounding their concurrency and parallelism, limiting per-request memory, reducing unnecessary scans, and applying engine-specific CPU and I/O governance. Measure every change by workload class and tighten limits only when the resulting queueing and completion times still meet business objectives.
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minuteQuick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
