Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Evaluate a recruitment chatbot according to what it is allowed to do and the consequences of its output. An assistant that answers policy questions or books interviews needs reliable answers, accessibility, privacy and fast human recovery. A system that screens, scores, ranks or recommends applicants can influence who advances and therefore requires evidence about selection effects, group-level performance, human oversight and applicable regulation.
The defensible method is to define the use boundary, demand supplier evidence, test the deployed system with realistic applicants and tasks, assess accessibility and protected-group outcomes, disclose AI use, provide human recourse, and monitor the system after launch. No single accuracy or fairness score proves that a recruitment chatbot is safe.
Start by classifying the chatbot’s role
Risk follows function, not the word chatbot. Write down every action the system can take and every person who may rely on its output.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems| Chatbot role | Typical actions | Primary evaluation concern | Additional concern when outputs affect selection |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAQ or information assistant | Answers questions about roles, eligibility, policies, locations, benefits or application steps. | Factual correctness, completeness, currency, clarity, privacy and accessibility. | Whether an incorrect or misleading answer prevents an applicant from applying or meeting a deadline. |
| Scheduling assistant | Collects availability, books or changes an interview, sends confirmations and escalates failures. | End-to-end task completion, reliable calendar integration, error recovery and human support. | Whether scheduling failures or unequal access remove applicants from consideration. |
| Screening or eligibility tool | Asks knockout questions, checks requirements or determines whether an application proceeds. | Question validity, consistency, explanation, accommodation and false-positive or false-negative rates. | Disparate impact, disability discrimination, lawful data use and meaningful human review. |
| Scoring, ranking or recommendation system | Assigns scores, orders candidates or recommends a shortlist to recruiters. | Validity of the job-related signal, calibration, stability and reviewer understanding. | Selection effects by group, contestability, auditability and high-risk employment obligations. |
Automated candidate matching and ranking are described by the European Commission AI Act Service Desk as recruitment and selection use cases in the employment category. Whether a particular deployment is covered depends on its intended purpose and actual role; confirm current requirements for the jurisdiction and implementation date.
#1 Best Overall
- Powerful Turbo Fan:CAGIWIRU Electric Air Duster have reached speed up to 130000RPM,Can efficient remove dust and debris.With LED light and Three Adjustable Speed to meet with different cleaning tasks.
- With Attached USB C Fasting Charging cable.Charing 3 hours,Enjoy up to 240 minutes of use on the lowest setting, For third speed can use for 25mins.with four charging options to meet with your needs.
- Wide Application: attached 5 different nozzles,making it suitable for a variety of scenes, such as car,pet, pc, keyboards, and other electronic devices. It also serves for office and home clean duster.
- Handy Design & Portable:Cordless air duster electric nozzle is Light weight and small size, design and comfortable to hold and space saving, convenient to carry around. You can put it in your room or inside the car without taking up space.
- Economical &Reusable: Built durable materials with a long-lasting battery,our CAGIWIRU air duster it's a sustainable alternative to disposable air cans.
Create an intended-use statement
Complete this statement before choosing a supplier:
- Which hiring stage and roles are in scope.
- Which questions, languages, channels and countries are supported.
- What data the chatbot collects, retains, exports or sends to other systems.
- Which actions it may perform, such as scheduling, reminders or status updates.
- Whether any response affects eligibility, scoring, ranking or a recruiter’s recommendation.
- What the system must not do, including making a final hiring decision if that is prohibited.
- When and how the conversation transfers to a trained person.
- Who owns the decision and who is accountable for errors, accommodations and complaints.
The UK government’s Responsible AI in Recruitment guide recommends defining the problem, task, purpose, desired functionality, employee interaction and human oversight before procurement. It also asks organizations to consider whether AI is appropriate for the problem at all.
Request evidence before you buy
Supplier documentation is a starting point, not proof that the system will work for your applicants. Ask for enough detail to reproduce the claims and identify limits.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Evidence request checklist
- System description: model or system type, retrieval or rules components, integrations, language support and versioning.
- Intended scope: supported uses, prohibited uses, expected human role and known failure conditions.
- Data information: training or reference-data sources, update process, retention, deletion, access controls and data-location options where available.
- Testing method: tasks, test populations, labels, sample sizes, evaluation dates, metrics and missing cases.
- Results: accuracy, task completion, effectiveness, uncertainty handling and fairness results, with subgroup definitions and confidence information where provided.
- Limitations: languages, accents, assistive technologies, unusual schedules, ambiguous questions, unsupported requests and integration dependencies.
- Change history: model, prompt, knowledge-base, policy and integration changes, with notice periods and rollback options.
- Incidents: how failures are reported, severity-rated, investigated, corrected and communicated to customers and applicants.
- Oversight controls: audit logs, reviewer queues, override capability, explanations and exportable records.
Ask what model and data were used and how the system’s purpose aligns with your organization’s goals. Treat a general benchmark as preliminary evidence: performance can change in your environment, with your applicant mix, policies, integrations and traffic. Require a pilot before broad deployment.
Test accuracy with realistic candidate tasks
Build a privacy-controlled test set from real process questions and scenarios. Remove unnecessary personal data, document how examples were selected, and include both routine and difficult cases.
Include the complete task range
- Role, location, eligibility and deadline questions whose answers can be checked against the current careers information.
- Accommodation requests and questions about accessible application routes.
- Unclear, incomplete, misspelled or colloquial questions.
- Unsupported questions that should produce a clear limitation and a human contact rather than a guess.
- Language variation, including the languages the intended-use statement promises to support.
- Interview booking, rescheduling, cancellation, time-zone conversion and confirmation.
- Failed calendar, applicant-tracking or identity integrations.
- Requests that require escalation, such as a complaint, correction of personal data or challenge to a screening result.
Score more than factual accuracy
| Measure | What to check | Example evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Correctness | Is the answer factually supported by the current policy or job record? | Reviewer marks supported, partly supported or incorrect, with the authoritative answer recorded. |
| Completeness | Does it include deadlines, conditions, exceptions and the next action? | Required elements checklist for each scenario. |
| Consistency | Do equivalent questions receive equivalent answers? | Paraphrase and repeated-session comparisons. |
| Uncertainty handling | Does it acknowledge missing information instead of inventing an answer? | Unsupported-question tests and hallucination count. |
| Task completion | Can an applicant finish the intended action without hidden manual work? | Completed booking, confirmation, cancellation or escalation record. |
| Human routing | Does the system direct the applicant to a reliable person when it cannot safely proceed? | Visible contact path, transfer success and response-time record. |
| Stability | Does behavior remain acceptable after content, model or integration changes? | Regression results from the same protected test set. |
These measures form a practical evaluation design; the cited government guidance does not establish a single standardized scoring protocol or universal pass mark. Set thresholds that reflect the consequence of an error. A wrong office-hours answer is not equivalent to an incorrect eligibility decision.
Test scheduling as an end-to-end workflow
- Enter availability in several time zones and with overlapping constraints.
- Ask the chatbot to propose slots and verify that every proposed slot is actually open.
- Select a slot and confirm that the event is created for the right candidate, role, interviewer and time zone.
- Check the confirmation message, calendar invitation and any accessibility information.
- Reschedule, cancel and retry after a simulated integration failure.
- Verify that an applicant who cannot select a slot can reach a person and be manually scheduled without losing progression.
The UK guidance uses manual scheduling while a booking bug is investigated as an example of remedying a process failure. Your test should verify both the technical fix path and the applicant’s protection while the defect remains open.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Evaluate fairness in context
Fairness is not one aggregate percentage. Examine whether the system performs differently for relevant groups and whether its interaction imposes a barrier unrelated to the job.
Rank #2
- Screen Cleaner is Your Screen’s New Bestfriend! - EVEO is proud to present a screen cleaner that’s perfectly suited for your TV. Meet your new screen cleaner, computer screen cleaner, laptop cleaner, iPad cleaner, Macbook,tv cleaner or any other electronic device. Our screen cleaner spray and wipe along with the included plush microfiber cloth, easily removes dust, fingerprints & other smudges on the screen’s surface. Clean effectively for a streak-free screen
- Gentle on your Screens - Our screen cleaner spray and wipes is compatible to be used even for the most sensitive LCD, LED, CRT, and OLED screens in proper use. Be at ease knowing that this product is compatible with all the major brands: LG, SONY, Samsung, Sharp, iPad, iPhone, Android screens, Kindle, PC monitors - we’ve got you covered! Can be used as LCD screen cleaner, tv cleaner, smart tv screen cleaner, and more
- Premium Super Soft Plush Microfiber Cloth - Included in this efficient screen cleaning kit. This screen cleaner spray and wipe has our signature plush microfiber cloth specially designed to comply with screens and monitors and leave them streak-free. Has been shown to effectively absorbs stubborn stains, zero streaks, and no fiber shedding. Always use this together with our screen cleaner for the best results
- Easy-to-Use Screen Cleaner Kit + microfiber cleaning cloth - The EVEO Screen Cleaning Kit will easily be your new favorite tool when it comes to taking care of the things you love most, quick and easy solution for a streak-free screen. Simply screw on the sprayer gun on the screen cleaner bottle. Spray the cleaning liquid onto the microfiber cloth, then wipe the screen until desired cleanliness & shine is achieved.
- Quality Screen Care Kit Worth Purchasing - Enjoy a convenient Screen Cleaner anytime, anywhere you need it. Your satisfaction is our top priority. We stand behind the quality of our products and that’s why, you shouldn’t be worrying at all. We manufacture the Best Screen Cleaner. and can be used for laptop cleaning kit, laptop screen cleaner, tv screen cleaner for smart tv. MacBook screen cleaner, monitor cleaner or screen cleaner spray for electronic devices with microfiber cleaning cloth
Separate inaccuracy from learned or process bias
An answer can be inaccurate for everyone, or accurate on average while failing more often for a particular group. The UK guide distinguishes learned bias from inaccuracy and warns that face, speech and voice technologies can be less accurate for some groups. A chatbot can create a similar problem through language assumptions, speech requirements, names, addresses, cultural phrasing or inaccessible interaction design.
Use group-specific measures
- Compare task-success, abandonment, escalation and error rates across legally and ethically appropriate groups.
- For screening, compare false-positive and false-negative outcomes, progression rates and score distributions, not just average accuracy.
- Review whether a group receives different information, extra questions, lower confidence or more frequent handoffs.
- Investigate differences in time to completion and access to a human, especially where a deadline applies.
- Document why each group comparison is lawful, necessary and privacy-preserving in the relevant jurisdiction.
Do not infer protected characteristics casually from names, writing style or voice. Use lawful testing methods, secure access, minimum necessary data and appropriate aggregation. Where a sample is too small for a reliable comparison, record the limitation and use additional qualitative review rather than claiming equal performance.
Check whether the interaction measures a job-relevant skill
Ask whether fast typing, uninterrupted speech, a particular accent, visual scanning, fine motor control, idiomatic English or a specific communication style is genuinely required for the job. If not, making it a condition of progressing can turn an interface preference into an employment barrier.
Recommended Free Tools
Make accessibility and accommodation part of the acceptance test
Accessibility is not a post-launch support ticket. Test the path before deployment with people who use assistive technologies and with applicants who need adjustments.
Run practical accessibility checks
- Complete the full conversation with a keyboard only, including focus order, visible focus and error recovery.
- Use a screen reader and text-to-speech to read prompts, choices, confirmations and transfer instructions.
- Increase text size and browser zoom without losing controls or content.
- Check color contrast, captions or transcripts for audio, and nonvisual alternatives for visual prompts.
- Test speech input only when speech is job-related, and provide a text or human alternative otherwise.
- Verify plain-language instructions, error messages, time limits and the ability to pause and return.
- Test mobile and low-bandwidth access if those are normal applicant conditions.
U.S. Department of Justice guidance says hiring technologies should be examined before and during use for disability screening. Tests should measure job skills rather than sensory, manual or speech abilities unrelated to the position. The guidance also warns that tools can screen out qualified applicants with disabilities.
Define the accommodation route
Publish a prominent way to request an adjustment before the chatbot asks for information that could disadvantage an applicant. Specify who receives the request, expected response time, alternative channel and protection of the application deadline. If an adjustment cannot remove the disadvantage, provide an equivalent human process; the UK guide gives text-to-speech as one way a visually impaired applicant might access a chatbot but recognizes that an alternative process may still be necessary.
Measure candidate experience, transparency and recourse
A technically accurate bot can still produce a poor or unfair experience if applicants do not know they are interacting with AI, cannot reach a person or have no way to correct an error.
Disclose AI use clearly
Tell applicants at the start that they are interacting with an AI system. Explain its role, what it can and cannot do, what information is collected, whether a human reviews the outcome and how to request help. The explanation should be understandable without requiring applicants to infer the system’s limits from a failure.
Rank #3
- 【Large size】：Measuring 800 x 300 mm/ 31. 5×12 inches, which is wider and taller than others. Large mouse pad can perfectly fit your keyboard and mouse of any size, and there is also ample space for peripherals such as phones, tablets, etc.
- 【LED backlight mouse pad】：Blade Hawks RGB mouse pad provides 7 static modes and 7 dynamic modes will give you the options you are looking for. Power-off memory function remembers the last lighting mode you selected. The super glow fiber Chroma will give you a colorful gaming setup that you want.
- 【Anti-slip rubber base】：Made from Natural rubber, this gaming mousepad will firmly grip your desktop, allowing you to enjoy the ultimate precision in the games you are most passionate about. It also comes with a texture that enhances this ability even further.
- 【Smooth and waterproof surface】: Micro-textured cloth surface, for extremely precise mouse control and a smooth movement. When liquid splashes on the gaming mouse pad, it forms water droplets and slides down. Will not delay your work or gameplay.
- 【Plug and play】: This mouse and keyboard pad is powered by USB, plug and play, no driver required. One button control light modes. Press one time to change the lighting mode, press twice to change the brightness, press and hold about 3 seconds turn ON/OFF.
Collect experience signals
After a task, ask whether the applicant understood that AI was being used, whether the answer was useful, whether the next step was clear, whether a person was reachable and whether the task could be completed. Track abandonment, repeated questions, transfer requests and time to completion as diagnostic signals. A low escalation rate is not automatically good; applicants may abandon instead of asking for help.
Provide a real feedback and appeal path
- Place a visible report link or contact option in the conversation and confirmation messages.
- Accept reports of incorrect, biased, inaccessible, privacy-threatening or blocking behavior.
- Record the issue, affected process, severity, date, system version and whether progression stopped.
- Assign an owner, a remediation deadline and a communication plan for affected applicants.
- Allow a person to review an adverse screening or ranking outcome where law and process require it.
- Preserve records needed to investigate without retaining unnecessary applicant data.
In the UK, assurance concerns include equality, accessibility, privacy, transparency and contestability. UK organizations should consider UK GDPR Article 22 and whether a data protection impact assessment is required. The Equality Act 2010 section 20 reasonable-adjustment duty may also apply.
Pilot in your own hiring environment
Run a controlled pilot before scale. Use the actual knowledge base, policies, integrations, applicant channels and representative tasks. Include recruiters, support staff and people who use assistive technologies, not only the implementation team.
Set launch gates in advance
Define minimum acceptable results before seeing the pilot outcome. Gates should cover:
- Correctness and completeness for each high-consequence task.
- Successful completion of booking, rescheduling, cancellation and escalation.
- Safe handling of unsupported and ambiguous questions.
- Accessibility across the tested technologies and a working alternative process.
- Group-specific differences in errors, abandonment, progression and time to help.
- Disclosure, consent or notice, human oversight and audit logging.
- Recovery from critical integration or content failures.
There is no validated universal threshold supplied by the official guidance. Set stricter gates for outputs that affect eligibility or ranking than for low-consequence informational answers, and document the rationale. Do not launch at scale while a material risk remains unmitigated.
Plan for performance drift
The UK guide notes that performance may differ by deployment environment and degrade as data or conditions change. Repeat tests after model, prompt, knowledge-base, policy, integration or user-population changes. Compare live metrics with the pilot baseline, review complaints and incidents alongside dashboards, and keep a rollback or human-only mode for serious failures.
Compare chatbot designs or suppliers on the same axes
| Comparison axis | Questions to ask | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Role and decision influence | Is it FAQ-only, scheduling, screening, scoring or ranking? Who can override it? | Determines the consequence of errors and the depth of legal and fairness review. |
| Accuracy in your environment | What are correctness, completeness, uncertainty and task-completion results on your test set? | General benchmarks may not transfer to your policies, languages or applicants. |
| Fairness and disability access | What subgroup tests exist? Can applicants use keyboards, screen readers, text-to-speech and alternate channels? | Average performance can conceal barriers or unequal failure rates. |
| Transparency and contestability | How is AI disclosed? Can applicants reach a person, request an adjustment and challenge an outcome? | Applicants need understandable notice and a remedy when the system is wrong. |
| Data and integrations | What data is collected and retained? How are calendars, applicant records and permissions controlled? | Privacy and integration failures can become selection or deadline failures. |
| Monitoring and change management | Are versions, incidents, audits, alerts, rollback and customer notifications supported? | Safe performance at launch does not guarantee safe performance after change. |
An FAQ assistant may be evaluated mainly on correctness, accessibility, privacy and service recovery. A system influencing shortlisting needs the same foundations plus stronger evidence about selection effects, human review and applicable high-risk requirements.
Apply the relevant jurisdiction requirements
| Jurisdiction | Key considerations |
|---|---|
| United Kingdom | The 2024 UK government guide addresses procurement, impact assessment, piloting, fairness, accessibility, disclosure, monitoring and applicant feedback. Consider UK GDPR Article 22, a data protection impact assessment where required, equality and transparency duties, contestability and reasonable adjustments under Equality Act 2010 section 20. |
| United States | U.S. Department of Justice guidance dated May 12, 2022 explains that the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to hiring technology. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Justice Department materials warn that tools can screen out qualified applicants with disabilities or create impermissible disability-related inquiries in some circumstances. Provide reasonable accommodations and test whether the tool measures job skills rather than unrelated sensory, manual or speech abilities. |
| European Union | The European Commission AI Act Service Desk describes recruitment and selection systems, including automated matching and ranking, as high-risk employment use cases. Determine whether the chatbot’s intended purpose and actual role bring it within the applicable rules, and verify current requirements and implementation dates for the deployment. |
These are assurance considerations, not jurisdiction-specific legal advice. The cited guidance does not establish that every FAQ chatbot is automatically a high-risk or regulated decision system.
Rank #4
- 【Softer and More Comfortable】Vaydeer wrist rest has unique diamond pattern, which is the combination of softness and aesthetics. The materials of wrist rest are improved into higher quality memory foam and covered with silky smooth lycra. The computer wrist rest makes you as comfortable and cushiony as like rest your wrists on clouds.
- 【Ergonomic Wrist Saver】The wrist rests for keyboard and mouse comes with a 17.32×3.15×0.83 inch keyboard wrist pad and a 5.94×3.15×0.83 inch mouse wrist support. Based on ergonomic design, the unique concave shape is the perfect fit for your wrist joints. The wrist rest pad fits most computer keyboards and laptops, improve hand and wrist posture, release your wrist and arm stress.
- 【Non-Slip Rubber Bottom】Featuring an anti-skid silicone base on the bottom, this wrist keyboard support stays firmly in place on your desk, preventing the padding from sliding around, ensuring stable and consistent wrist support during extended computer sessions.
- 【Better Experience & Pain Relief】Our keyboard arm rest is beneficial to alleviate the soreness caused by direct contact and friction between your arm and a hard desk surface, reducing the risk of wrist fatigue or carpal tunnel. The soft texture of memory foam can evenly distribute the pressure around your wrists and provide good support with just enough give.
- 【Helpful in Multiple Scenarios】Whether you're working, studying, writing, typing, gaming, this keyboard and mouse rest combo is an essential accessory to add comfort and support to your hands and wrists. It’s also a great gift for men, women, family, friend, coworker, gamer, teacher, etc.
Common failure modes and corrective actions
The vendor reports one impressive accuracy number
Problem: The number may come from a different language, policy set, applicant population or test environment.
Action: Request the test method and limits, then reproduce representative tasks in your environment and repeat them after changes.
The chatbot answers correctly but blocks an applicant
Problem: A rigid answer, inaccessible control or broken calendar integration can prevent progression even when the underlying information is right.
Action: Test edge cases, provide a human route, protect deadlines and record whether the issue stopped the application.
A low escalation rate is treated as success
Problem: Applicants may abandon because they cannot find help.
Action: Measure abandonment, repeated questions, task completion and knowledge of the human channel together with escalation.
Fairness is assessed only in aggregate
Problem: Average accuracy can hide higher error or abandonment rates for a group.
Action: Compare relevant group outcomes using lawful, privacy-preserving methods and investigate interaction barriers.
Best Value
- 【No Drill Mounted】Cable management tray can be assembled in as little as 3 minutes or less-simply. Side clips easily clampe the edge of desk, pass through the holes on the sides, and secure excess cables with baskets. Desk cable management supports inward or outward installation to meet your needs in different scenarios, and provides you with great convenience when collecting and organizing wires.
- 【Rubber Pad Protects Desk】Wire organizer under desk built-in soft rubber pads on the clamp protect your desk from scratches, so you will not damage your furniture or office.
- 【Sturdy and Beautiful】Cord management under desk is made of high-quality carbon steel and holds about 15 lbs. The wire basket has 2 holes on each side of the tray to enable your cables to pass freely. Cable baskets are suitable for desk thickness use from 0.4" to 2.4".
- 【Space Saving & Keep Organized】Desk cable management tray holds all your power cords, outlet strips, USB hubs and computer transformers hidden from your feet, and the data cables will not enter the vacuum cleaner to keep your desk clean and tidy. Desk wire organizer is also suitable for use in the kitchen and outdoors.
- 【Reduce Safety Risks】Cable tray under desk keeps all plugs away from your kids, no more worry about tripping. Using 2 holes wire tray saves extra space, helps you easily cabling and wire protection. The mesh design is not easy to accumulate dust, but avoids safety accidents caused by messy wires.
Accessibility is deferred until launch
Problem: Retrofitting a speech-, vision- or motor-dependent interaction may not remove the disadvantage.
Action: Test assistive technologies before deployment and maintain an equivalent human process.
A hypothetical example is mistaken for a statistic
Problem: The UK guide uses a hypothetical 20% drop in model performance during a pilot and a scenario in which 40% of applicants were unaware that AI was being used. Neither figure is a published prevalence statistic about recruitment chatbots.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Action: Treat such scenarios as illustrations of risks to test, not as evidence of how often those risks occur.
Use a governance record that remains auditable
Keep one decision record for the chatbot’s life cycle. It should contain the intended-use statement, prohibited uses, supplier evidence, test-set design, accuracy and subgroup results, accessibility findings, accommodation procedure, privacy and impact assessments, launch decision, open risks, responsible owners, incident log, change history and monitoring results.
Review the record at each material change and after a serious complaint. If a defect can affect eligibility, ranking, a deadline or access for a group, pause the affected automation, preserve the applicant’s opportunity to proceed through a human channel, investigate the cause and document the remedy.
Charlotte A. Burrows, chair of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, stated on May 12, 2022: “New technologies should not become new ways to discriminate. If employers are aware of the ways AI and other technologies can discriminate against persons with disabilities, they can take steps to prevent it,”
PC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchThat principle is a practical acceptance test: the organization must be able to identify how the chatbot could fail, detect the failure in operation and prevent the failure from deciding an applicant’s fate.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
