Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more

MSSPs can make ransomware hunts more useful by looking for attacker activity before encryption, covering both customer environments and the provider’s own management systems, and ensuring that findings can be investigated and acted on. That means collecting the right logs, checking identity and remote-access anomalies, watching for attempts to impair recovery, and agreeing on response roles with customers in advance. Threat hunting can help find a foothold or limit damage; it cannot guarantee that an attack will be prevented or detected.

Why hunt before ransomware becomes obvious?

Encryption is a conspicuous stage of an incident, but it may not be the first. An intruder can establish access and carry out other activity before files are encrypted. Proactive hunting searches for signs of that activity rather than waiting for an alert or visible disruption. CISA and FBI guidance describes threat hunting as a proactive search for threat-actor activity intended to prevent attacks or minimize damage if an attack succeeds.

That purpose is different from simply matching known indicators. An indicator can help identify activity already associated with a threat, but a hunt also examines behavior and context: who accessed a system, how privileges changed, whether a login fits the account’s normal role, and whether an endpoint or recovery system was altered. No single pattern applies to every ransomware incident, so findings need validation rather than automatic attribution.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Why an MSSP must hunt its own management plane

A managed provider’s remote management and administrative access can connect its infrastructure to multiple customer environments. CISA’s Joint Cyber Defense Collaborative has warned that exploitation of remote monitoring and management (RMM) platforms can create footholds in MSP servers and, from there, customer networks. That makes the provider’s own RMM servers, remote-access pathways, privileged service accounts, delegated permissions, and customer connections part of the hunt scope—not just the customer endpoints being monitored.

#1 Best Overall
Yubico - Security Key C NFC - Basic Compatibility - Multi-Factor authentication (MFA) Security Key and passkey, Connect via USB-C or NFC, FIDO Certified
  • POWERFUL SECURITY KEY: The Security Key C NFC is the essential physical passkey for protecting your digital life from phishing attacks. It ensures only you can access your accounts.
  • WORKS WITH 1000+ ACCOUNTS: Compatible with Google, Microsoft, and Apple. A single Security Key C NFC secures 100 of your favorite accounts, including email, password managers, and more.
  • FAST & CONVENIENT LOGIN: Plug in your Security Key C NFC via USB-C and tap it, or tap it against your phone (NFC) to authenticate. No batteries, no internet connection, and no extra fees required.
  • TRUSTED PASSKEY TECHNOLOGY: Uses the latest passkey standards (FIDO2/WebAuthn & FIDO U2F) but does not support One-Time Passwords. For complex needs, check out the YubiKey 5 Series.
  • BUILT TO LAST: Made from tough, waterproof, and crush-resistant materials. Manufactured in Sweden and programmed in the USA with the highest security standards.

This creates a cross-customer risk. A suspicious event on a provider system may have implications beyond one tenant, while legitimate maintenance can resemble malicious activity if investigators lack context. Providers should be able to establish which account acted, from what device, within which customer scope, and whether the action matches an approved change or ticket.

What to hunt for

CISA’s interagency #StopRansomware Guide identifies several useful leads. They are investigation starting points, not proof of compromise:

Rank #2
Sale
Thetis Nano-A FIDO2 Security Key Hardware Passkey Device with USB Type A, TOTP/HOTP, FIDO2.0 Two Factor Authentication 2FA MFA, Works with Windows/mac/iOS/Android/Linux/Gmail/Facebook/GitHub/Coinbase
  • Ultra-Compact FIDO2 Security Key - Plug-and-stay or carry on a keychain. This USB-A hardware security key offers portable, always-on protection for desktop and mobile use. (Item Size: 0.75 X 0.74 IN x 0.25 IN)
  • USB-A Hardware Key for All Devices - Works with USB-A ports on PC, Mac, Android, and other laptop/notebook device. Enables secure, cross-platform login with FIDO2.0 passkey support.
  • FIDO Certified Security Key - Meets FIDO and FIDO2 standards. Works with Google, Microsoft, GitHub, Dropbox, and more. Please check service compatibility before purchase.
  • Passwordless Login with Passkey - Supports passkey login via WebAuthn and CTAP2. Enjoy password-free sign-ins where supported. Not all websites or services currently support passkeys.
  • Advanced Multi-Factor Authentication - Offers 200 FIDO2 passkey slots and 50 OATH-TOTP slots. Strong, flexible 2FA/MFA support across various apps and authentication platforms.
  • Identity and privilege changes: newly created or escalated Active Directory accounts, along with unusual activity by privileged accounts.
  • Remote-access anomalies: VPN or other logins that are unusual for the account, source, timing, or expected access pattern.
  • Changes that could impair recovery: endpoint activity affecting backups, shadow copies, disk journaling, or boot configurations.

These leads become more actionable when correlated across identity, endpoint, network, and remote-access records. For example, a privileged account change should be checked against its owner, the source device, the time of access, the relevant customer, and any authorized maintenance context. A single unfamiliar login or system change is not enough on its own to establish malicious activity.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

A practical hunt workflow for provider and customer environments

The following sequence is an operational synthesis of the cited guidance, not a checklist prescribed verbatim by CISA. Adapt it to the provider’s architecture and customer agreements.

Rank #3
FIDO2 U2F Security Key Passkey Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) USB Key PIN+Touch (Non-Biometric) USB-A Type TrustKey T110
  • Security Key : Protect your online accounts against unauthorized access by using FIDO2 and U2F authentication with T110. It's the world's most protective security key that works with windows, Mac OS, Linux as well as Chrome, Firefox, Edge and many other major browsers.
  • Certified with the new FIDO2 standard, T110 provides the benefit of fast login and strong protection against phishing, account takeover as well as many other online attactks.
  • Works with : Bank of America, Github, Google, Microsoft, DUO, Twitter, Facebook, Dropbox, Apple, ebay, BINANCE, mor and more.
  • Fits USB-A port : Insert the T110 security key into the USB-A port of each service and log in conveniently with one touch
  • For the driver download and user guide, please visit TrustKey Solutions Home support page.
  1. Define the scope. Map the provider’s RMM servers and remote-access routes, privileged service accounts, delegated permissions, and customer connections. Include the customer systems and identities relevant to the suspected activity.
  2. Check telemetry before calling the hunt complete. Confirm access to identity and directory events, VPN and remote-access logs, endpoint events, network-defense signals, RMM administration logs, and backup or recovery-system events where available. Record gaps: an event source that was not collected cannot support a confident conclusion.
  3. Investigate the core leads. Review account creation and privilege escalation, suspicious privileged-account use, unusual remote logins, and endpoint changes that could affect backup or boot recovery. Look for related activity across systems, not just an isolated alert.
  4. Build and validate a timeline. Compare events across provider and customer environments. Check approved change windows, ticket context, account ownership, source device, and customer scope to distinguish authorized administration from unexplained access.
  5. Escalate credible findings under the response plan. Preserve relevant evidence, coordinate containment with the customer, and check for persistence or activity affecting additional tenants before declaring an environment clean. Follow agreed authority and communication paths rather than improvising them during an incident.
  6. Refresh the hunt hypothesis. Review current advisories and indicators before operational use. CISA’s Play ransomware advisory was updated on June 4, 2025 with additional tactics, techniques, procedures (TTPs), and indicators of compromise (IOCs). That update illustrates why actor-specific material should be treated as time-sensitive, not as a permanent detection list.

Make the hunt actionable with logging, access controls, and preparation

A joint advisory released May 11, 2022 by CISA and partner agencies in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand recommends monitoring and logging, endpoint detection and network-defense monitoring, and retaining the most important logs for at least six months. Six months is a recommendation in that advisory, not a universal statutory retention period. Organizations should also check applicable local requirements and their own operational needs.

The same advisory recommends securing remote-access applications and using multifactor authentication (MFA) where possible. CISA’s ransomware guide also advises least privilege and limiting third-party access to systems within the third party’s role. For an MSSP, these recommendations can be reflected in access design and customer agreements: define which systems provider personnel may reach, which accounts they may use, and who can authorize or revoke access.

Rank #4
Sale
ATLKey USB-C Security Key for Passkey & 2FA, FIDO2/U2F Certified with 3-Side Touch & Multi-Color LED, Stores 100 Passkeys, Phishing-Resistant Login for Google, Microsoft, Apple & More, IP68 Waterproof
  • PHISHING-RESISTANT 2FA: Cryptographically binds to real domains, making phishing attacks impossible unlike SMS codes or authenticator apps.
  • 3-SIDE CAPACITIVE TOUCH: Tap the end, left, or right side to authenticate, so it works in any orientation or crowded USB port.
  • MULTI-COLOR LED INDICATOR: Blue means ready, blinking blue means tap now, green means success, and red means error for instant status feedback.
  • IP68 WATERPROOF & BATTERY-FREE: Crush-resistant one-piece construction survives daily carry on a keychain or in a bag for years without any batteries.
  • UNIVERSAL COMPATIBILITY: Works with Google, Microsoft, Apple, GitHub, AWS, and any FIDO2 / U2F / WebAuthn service, storing up to 100 passkeys.

Preparation matters as much as detection. The advisory recommends developing and exercising incident-response and recovery plans with defined stakeholder roles. Plans should make clear who can authorize containment, how the provider and customer coordinate, how evidence is preserved, and who leads recovery. The advisory also recommends managing supply-chain risk across security, legal, and procurement functions.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

Questions to ask when evaluating an MSSP’s hunt capability

Official guidance does not provide a formal scorecard for comparing MSSP hunt services. These practical questions translate its recommendations into a buyer’s discussion; they are not a vendor ranking.

Area Ask the provider Why it matters
Scope Does hunting cover the provider’s RMM and privileged access as well as customer identities and endpoints? A provider management-plane foothold can create risk across connected customer environments.
Telemetry Which identity, endpoint, network, remote-access, RMM, and recovery-related events can the service access and retain? Hunt conclusions depend on available records; missing sources leave blind spots.
Method Does investigation include identity anomalies, unusual remote logins, and activity that could impair recovery, or rely only on static IOC matching? Behavior and context can reveal leads that are not limited to known indicators.
Response Are escalation authority, evidence preservation, customer coordination, containment, and recovery roles agreed and exercised? A credible finding is useful only if the parties know how to act on it.
Freshness How are threat hypotheses and actor-specific indicators reviewed as advisories change? Indicators and TTP information can be updated; stale material can misdirect a hunt.

Keep guidance, obligations, and claims in proportion

The cited advisories provide recommendations, not a guarantee that a particular service will find every foothold or stop every ransomware incident. The May 2022 MSP advisory and the interagency ransomware guide are useful baselines, but organizations should confirm current guidance and follow local incident-reporting and regulatory obligations. CISA’s Cyber Threat Hunt Assessment page describes a Department of Justice service for federal agencies; it should not be treated as a generally available commercial MSSP offering.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.