How Game Adaptations Differ From Their Source Material—and Why Changes Are Made

iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more

Game adaptations change their source material because a story has to work in a different medium. A television series can linger on a character who was peripheral to the gameplay; a game has to make its story function alongside player actions, level design, and the experience of playing. The right adaptation is not necessarily the one that reproduces every plot point. It is the one that makes deliberate choices about what to preserve, omit, expand, or reframe—and gives the new work a reason to exist on its own terms.

What counts as a change in a game adaptation?

“Game adaptation” can describe more than one direction of travel. A film or television series may adapt a game, while a game may adapt a story from another medium. In either case, the creative team is translating material into a form with different tools and constraints. Even when the source and adaptation share characters, settings, or major events, the new work may tell the story differently.

#	Preview	Product	Price
1		The Last of Us Part I – PlayStation 5	$37.99	Buy on Amazon
2		The Last of Us: Remastered (PS4)	$22.40	Buy on Amazon
3		PS4 THE LAST OF US REMASTERED (US) [video game]	$21.88	Buy on Amazon

It helps to separate the source material from the adaptation’s design. The source supplies elements that may be preserved, such as a world or central characters. The adaptation then decides how those elements serve its own audience and medium. A screen version has to choose a fixed sequence of events. A game may need to make the player’s actions meaningful, accommodate different outcomes, or fit its narrative around the way its levels are played.

That distinction changes how to judge a deviation. A change is not automatically disrespectful, nor does it prove that the original was deficient. It may be an attempt to preserve the source’s core while changing the way its story is delivered. It may also reflect practical design decisions or a desire to create an experience that is not simply a repeat for people who already know the source.

#1 Best Overall

Sale

The Last of Us Part I – PlayStation 5

• Enhanced visuals: Completely rebuilt from the ground up using Naughty Dog’s latest PS5 engine technology to improve every visual detail, The Last of Us experience has been faithfully enhanced with more realistic lighting and atmosphere, more intricate environments and creative reimaginings of familiar spaces.
• Fast loading: Initial loading times are near instant, and seamless after the first instance thanks to the PS5 console’s SSD – so you can pick up where you left off in the story and load specific encounters and chapters more quickly.
• Haptic feedback: DualSense wireless controller haptic feedback support for every weapon elevates combat encounters, and environments are brought to life through DualSense wireless controller haptic sensations of subtle falling rain, the crunch of stepping on snow and more.
• Adaptive triggers: All The Last of Us iconic weapons, including Joel’s revolver and Ellie’s bow, now deliver dynamic DualSense wireless controller trigger resistance and kickback on firing for deeper combat immersion.
• 3D Audio: Designed to make use of the PS5 console’s Tempest 3D AudioTech, Naughty Dog’s newly upgraded audio engine delivers richer soundscapes, bigger explosive moments and more visceral gameplay through compatible stereo headphones (analogue or USB) or TV speakers.

$37.99

Buy on Amazon

Why there is no single adaptation formula

A story-rich game and a game without a fixed story present different challenges

Asad Qizilbash, Head of PlayStation Productions, has said that “There’s not one size that fits all in terms of a method of adapting video games to film or TV.” His examples show why. The Last of Us already has an established narrative, world, and characters in its games. Gran Turismo, by contrast, did not have an established story in the games to carry over as a conventional plot.

For its Gran Turismo film, the approach was to center the true story of Jann Mardenborough, a player of the games who became a professional race-car driver. That is a different kind of adaptation from bringing an existing game narrative to the screen: the games provide the context, while a real person’s story supplies the film’s central narrative.

The contrast is a useful reminder that “faithfulness” cannot be measured in the same way for every property. Where a game has a developed story, creators can make choices about which parts to retain or reinterpret. Where it does not, they may need to find another story structure connected to the source. These are two distinct responses to two distinct starting points, not a universal prescription for game adaptations.

One source can support both omission and expansion

Qizilbash describes the The Last of Us television adaptation as a balancing act: deciding what to leave out and what new material to add. He points to deeper exploration of side characters as material that could not work in a video game in the same way. A character or relationship can receive more attention on screen without the adaptation reproducing every playable sequence.

His description of the source as “inspiration versus a rule book” captures an important distinction. Treating a game as inspiration does not mean abandoning it; it means that its elements can be reshaped to serve the new version. The meaningful question is not simply whether a scene or detail changed, but what the adaptation kept, what it changed, and how the change functions in the screen story.

How gameplay changes the way a game tells a story

Story and play develop together

Changes can also happen while a game itself is being made. Josh Grier, co-founder of Ember Lab, describes game development as more iterative than film development. His account of the team’s process is direct: “Gameplay is king and if you want to tell a compelling narrative within that, you have to be flexible.” He says the team looks for creative solutions that let gameplay and story work together.

This is one creator’s description, not a rule that every studio follows in exactly the same way. It does, however, explain why a game’s narrative may need to adjust as its design takes shape. A story idea might be compelling in isolation but need reworking to fit the play experience the team is building. Conversely, gameplay needs can prompt a creative solution that changes how the story is presented or structured.

Rank #2

The Last of Us: Remastered (PS4)

• The Last of Us Remastered Standard Edition

$22.40

Buy on Amazon

The important point is that this can be an iterative relationship rather than a one-way process in which a finished script is simply placed inside a game. The story and the interactive design may influence each other as the team works. A change made during that process is not necessarily a judgment about the value of the original idea; it can be a response to how the game works in practice.

Player choices can become plot events

Some games make player agency part of their narrative structure. In a PlayStation.Blog interview, Will Byles, Supermassive’s executive creative director, described Until Dawn as a story that changes in response to events and the player’s character decisions. “The story will change, adapt,” he said.

In Byles’s account, the player has control over a character’s fate. A character’s death advances the story rather than triggering a reset or respawn. That approach makes consequence part of the horror experience: what happens is not only something the player watches, but can be shaped by the player’s actions.

That kind of structure complicates the idea of adapting a story as a fixed chain of scenes. If outcomes depend on player decisions, the narrative must account for consequences and possible variation. A screen adaptation, by comparison, presents a selected sequence for its audience. Neither form is inherently more faithful; each defines what the audience can influence and what the story needs to accommodate.

Presentation can serve immersion and viewing

Byles also explained that Until Dawn minimized on-screen interface elements. The team wanted the game to be enjoyable to play and watch, and fewer abstract interface elements helped preserve immersion. This is an example of a presentation decision shaped by how the experience would feel to its audience, not just by the plot itself.

It also shows why adaptation-related choices are not limited to changing characters or events. The way information appears, the amount of interface on screen, and the relationship between play and viewing can all shape the form of a game. When discussing a change, it is useful to ask whether it affects the story, the gameplay, the presentation, or more than one of those at once.

How level design and continuity influence game stories

The story has to fit the world players can explore

Nintendo’s interview with the developers of The Legend of Zelda: Echoes of Wisdom describes story and world decisions being worked out alongside gameplay. The team discusses designing rifts that could appear in different locations, accommodate level design, and change as the story progressed. The example connects narrative development to where events can happen and how players move through the world.

Rank #3

PS4 THE LAST OF US REMASTERED (US) [video game]

$21.88

Buy on Amazon

A story that works as a sequence of scenes may need adjustments when it must also support the spaces a player explores. In this example, the rifts’ locations and development are not separate from the game’s design: the team considered how they could fit the levels and the progression of the story. That is a specific account of one game’s development, not evidence that every game handles world design in the same way.

A long-running series must balance change with recognition

In the same interview, Nintendo producer Eiji Aonuma discusses weighing how much to add or change while keeping a game recognizably part of Zelda. The developers also consider how players might react to plot developments that appear inconsistent with other games in the series. That makes continuity a creative constraint as well as a matter of lore: a new story must make room for developments while managing expectations formed by earlier entries.

This tension is familiar in long-running franchises. Too little change can make a new entry feel like a repetition; too much can make it feel disconnected from the series. The developers’ account does not establish a formula for resolving that tension. It does show why choices about lore, character roles, and new plot developments can involve both gameplay priorities and audience interpretation.

How to evaluate a particular adaptation change

Before deciding whether a change improves or weakens an adaptation, identify the change precisely. “It is different” is only a description, not an explanation or a verdict. The following questions help distinguish a purposeful translation between media from a change whose effect is less clear:

• What changed? Identify the specific event, character, relationship, setting, or presentation choice. Separate what was omitted from what was added or reframed.
• What does the new medium allow or require? Ask whether the change uses a screen narrative’s ability to give a character more time, or responds to a game’s need to integrate story with play and level design.
• What function does it serve? Look for a connection to gameplay, player consequence, world design, continuity, or the way the audience experiences the work. A creator’s explanation can clarify intent, though intent alone does not determine whether the choice succeeds.
• What does the adaptation preserve? A version can alter particular scenes while retaining a recognizable world, characters, or central premise. Conversely, surface similarities do not guarantee that it preserves what mattered to a particular audience.
• Who is meant to experience it, and how? A screen version offers a fixed narrative, while a game can place the audience inside decisions and consequences. A creative team may also want the adaptation to offer something distinct to people already familiar with the source.
• How does it sit within a series? For a continuing franchise, consider whether the development fits the world and how it may be read against previous entries, rather than judging it as an isolated plot point.

These are comparison questions, not a formal scoring system. They make the discussion more precise: readers can separate the fact of a change from its likely purpose, and separate a creator’s stated reason from their own judgment of the result.

What the available creator accounts do—and do not—establish

The examples come from official publisher and developer interviews: Sony Interactive Entertainment on PlayStation Productions, Nintendo UK on Echoes of Wisdom, PlayStation.Blog interviewing Will Byles, and Unreal Engine interviewing Josh Grier. They offer direct explanations of particular creative approaches, including adaptation strategy, iterative development, player agency, interface choices, level design, and series continuity.

They do not establish one industry-wide consensus about why adaptations change, or how often a particular reason leads to a change. There is no named statistic in these accounts that measures the frequency of deviations or ranks their causes. It would therefore be misleading to treat one creator’s explanation as a universal rule or to claim that every adaptation changes its source for the same reason.

The strongest general conclusion is narrower: adaptation is a process of making choices for a particular medium and work. A team may preserve some elements, omit others, expand a character or event, or reshape a story around gameplay and player consequences. Understanding the specific choice—and the function it serves—is more useful than treating every difference as either betrayal or improvement.

Quick Recap

SaleBestseller No. 1

The Last of Us Part I – PlayStation 5

$37.99

Bestseller No. 2

The Last of Us: Remastered (PS4)

The Last of Us Remastered Standard Edition

$22.40

Bestseller No. 3

PS4 THE LAST OF US REMASTERED (US) [video game]

$21.88

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.