Wikipedia vs Encyclopedia.com

Wikipedia9.4Visit EEncyclopedia.com8.8Visit

Higher score Wikipedia #1 in Online Encyclopedias 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Wikipedia

vs

E Encyclopedia.com #4 in Online Encyclopedias 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 4 features Try Encyclopedia.com

• Wikipedia fits best

  Free, broad everyday research

• Encyclopedia.com fits best

  Free source-based reference browsing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Wikipedia 9.4/10 Visit ↗	EEncyclopedia.com 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.4	8.8
Ranking	#1 in Online Encyclopedias	#4 in Online Encyclopedias
Best for	Free, broad everyday research	Free source-based reference browsing
Pricing model	Free	Free
Starting price	Free plan	Free plan
Free plan	✓	✓
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud, Mobile	Cloud
Platforms	Web, iOS, Android	Web
Features Wikipedia 3/4 · Encyclopedia.com 2/4
Citation tools	✓	✓
Educator resources	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Institutional access	Not checked yet	✓ (best)
Mobile apps	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Specs
Content formats	Multimedia	Multimedia
Update frequency	Continuous	Continuous
Our review
Pros	Free access across web, iOS, and Android Multilingual articles with inline citations and references Revision histories, discussions, watchlists, and notifications	Free access to reference entries, dictionaries, biographies, and summaries MLA, Chicago, and APA citation generation Multimedia topic pages with related newspaper and magazine articles
Cons	Volunteer editing can produce varied article coverage Offline saving and reading is available through Android No conventional paid plans or paid-tier feature structure	Web-based access is the primary listed platform Coverage centers on reference browsing rather than specialized research workflows Content printing and downloads are limited to personal use
Our verdict	Wikipedia is a free, multilingual online encyclopedia operated by the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation. It serves readers who need broad everyday research across text and images, with articles written, edited, and fact-checked by a global… Read the review →	Encyclopedia.com is a free web-based reference service for students, researchers, and general readers who need searchable encyclopedia entries and related reference material. Its collection includes encyclopedia entries, dictionaries,… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Wikipedia — where it wins

  • Free access across web, iOS, and Android
  • Multilingual articles with inline citations and references
  • Revision histories, discussions, watchlists, and notifications

  Where it doesn't

  • Volunteer editing can produce varied article coverage
  • Offline saving and reading is available through Android
  • No conventional paid plans or paid-tier feature structure

• Encyclopedia.com — where it wins

  • Free access to reference entries, dictionaries, biographies, and summaries
  • MLA, Chicago, and APA citation generation
  • Multimedia topic pages with related newspaper and magazine articles

  Where it doesn't

  • Web-based access is the primary listed platform
  • Coverage centers on reference browsing rather than specialized research workflows
  • Content printing and downloads are limited to personal use

• Wikipedia9.4/10 · Free plan

  A broad, free reference resource with multilingual search and transparent article histories.

  Visit WikipediaFull verdict →
• EEncyclopedia.com8.8/10 · Free plan

  A free reference browser with citations, multimedia summaries, and related articles.

  Try Encyclopedia.comFull verdict →