Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Library Automation

TIND ILS vs Evergreen

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
TIND ILS #6 in Library Automation 7.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 3 of 6 features Visit TIND
Evergreen #8 in Library Automation 7.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 6 features Visit Evergreen

TIND ILS leads on 0 checks, Evergreen on 1, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Free planonly Evergreen
  • Most featuresTIND ILS · 3 of 6

TIND ILS and Evergreen score identically on our rubric (7.9 out of 10) for library automation; TIND ILS sits at #6 and Evergreen at #8 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.

Evergreen offers free plan; TIND ILS doesn't.

TIND ILS is the better fit for libraries needing acquisitions and self-service workflows. Evergreen is the better fit for libraries needing self-hosted circulation and cataloging.

  • TIND ILS fits best

    Libraries needing acquisitions and self-service workflows

  • Evergreen fits best

    Libraries needing self-hosted circulation and cataloging

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature TIND ILS 7.9/10 Visit ↗ Evergreen 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.9 7.9
Ranking #6 in Library Automation #8 in Library Automation
Best for Libraries needing acquisitions and self-service workflows Libraries needing self-hosted circulation and cataloging
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price Pricing on request Free plan
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Email Community, Docs
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features TIND ILS 3/6 · Evergreen 0/6
RFID support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Self-check integration ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Consortium support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Acquisitions module ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Serials management ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Patron mobile app Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment Cloud Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Covers cataloging, circulation, acquisitions, and serials workflows
  • Supports NCIP self-service kiosks and OCLC Connexion resource sharing
  • Offers batch metadata editing and CSV and Excel report exports
  • Handles circulation, check-in, and hold placement and management.
  • Supports MARC/MARCXML and Z39.50 record import workflows.
  • Includes acquisitions, budget and invoice tracking, and a public catalog.
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • The documented focus is academic and special libraries
  • Support is listed via email
  • Deployment is self-hosted, so libraries need to manage hosting.
  • Support channels are community and documentation.
  • Hosting, support, migration, and development services may cost extra.
Our verdict

TIND ILS is a cloud-based library management system aimed at academic and special libraries. Its modules cover cataloging, circulation, a public online catalog, acquisitions, serials, resource sharing, patron profiles, reporting, and batch…

Read the review →

Evergreen is an open-source library automation system for institutions ranging from small libraries to large consortia. Its staff interface covers cataloging and circulation, while a public access catalog lets patrons discover materials.…

Read the review →
  1. TIND ILSLibrary Automation 7.9Pricing on request
  2. EvergreenLibrary Automation 7.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • TIND ILS — where it wins

    • Covers cataloging, circulation, acquisitions, and serials workflows
    • Supports NCIP self-service kiosks and OCLC Connexion resource sharing
    • Offers batch metadata editing and CSV and Excel report exports

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • The documented focus is academic and special libraries
    • Support is listed via email
  • Evergreen — where it wins

    • Handles circulation, check-in, and hold placement and management.
    • Supports MARC/MARCXML and Z39.50 record import workflows.
    • Includes acquisitions, budget and invoice tracking, and a public catalog.

    Where it doesn't

    • Deployment is self-hosted, so libraries need to manage hosting.
    • Support channels are community and documentation.
    • Hosting, support, migration, and development services may cost extra.
  • TIND ILS7.9/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad library workflows meet cloud access, with pricing available through sales.

    Visit TINDFull verdict →
  • Evergreen7.9/10 · Free plan

    Free, self-hosted library software for circulation, cataloging, acquisitions, and patron access.

    Visit EvergreenFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update