Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Audio Player Software

Rhythmbox vs Audacious

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Rhythmbox #2 in Audio Player Software 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Rhythmbox
Audacious #7 in Audio Player Software 7.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Audacious

Rhythmbox leads on 0 checks, Audacious on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRhythmbox · 8.5/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresRhythmbox · 3 of 4

Rhythmbox scores higher on our rubric for audio player software: 8.5 against 7.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #7.

Rhythmbox is the better fit for linux users wanting a simple free music library. Audacious is the better fit for open-source players wanting flexible desktop playback.

  • Rhythmbox fits best

    Linux users wanting a simple free music library

  • Audacious fits best

    Open-source players wanting flexible desktop playback

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Rhythmbox 8.5/10 Visit ↗ Audacious 7.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.5 7.7
Ranking #2 in Audio Player Software #7 in Audio Player Software
Best for Linux users wanting a simple free music library Open-source players wanting flexible desktop playback
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Desktop Desktop
Platforms Linux Windows, macOS, Linux
Built for Solo Solo, Small business
Features Rhythmbox 3/4 · Audacious 0/4
Library management ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Playlist support ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Tag editing ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Gapless playback Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Supported platforms Linux Not checked yet
Audio formats Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Organizes and browses a personal music library
  • Includes playback and playlist management
  • Lets users edit track metadata; free and open source
  • Plays local music, audio CDs, and internet streams
  • Offers library search, playlists, ReplayGain, and gapless playback
  • Qt, GTK, and Winamp Classic interfaces with plugin-based support
Cons
  • Available for Linux only
  • Focused on personal music libraries and core playback
  • No AI features
  • Focused on audio rather than video playback
  • Desktop-only deployment
  • Support is through community resources and documentation
Our verdict

Rhythmbox is a desktop music player and library manager from the GNOME project, intended for Linux desktop environments. It is aimed at people who want to organize and browse a personal music collection, play tracks, create or manage…

Read the review →

Audacious is a free, open-source desktop audio player for people who want control over music playback without a paid plan. It runs on Linux, BSD derivatives, macOS, and Windows, and handles local music, audio CDs, and internet streams. Its…

Read the review →
  1. RhythmboxAudio Player Software 8.5Free plan
  2. AudaciousAudio Player Software 7.7Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Rhythmbox — where it wins

    • Organizes and browses a personal music library
    • Includes playback and playlist management
    • Lets users edit track metadata; free and open source

    Where it doesn't

    • Available for Linux only
    • Focused on personal music libraries and core playback
    • No AI features
  • Audacious — where it wins

    • Plays local music, audio CDs, and internet streams
    • Offers library search, playlists, ReplayGain, and gapless playback
    • Qt, GTK, and Winamp Classic interfaces with plugin-based support

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on audio rather than video playback
    • Desktop-only deployment
    • Support is through community resources and documentation

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update