Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Web Content Management Software

Progress Sitefinity vs Umbraco CMS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score Progress Sitefinity #2 in Web Content Management Software 9.3/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Sitefinity
Umbraco CMS #5 in Web Content Management Software 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 2 features Visit Umbraco

Progress Sitefinity leads on 0 checks, Umbraco CMS on 1, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreProgress Sitefinity · 9.3/10
  • Free planonly Umbraco CMS
  • Most featuresUmbraco CMS · 1 of 2

Progress Sitefinity scores higher on our rubric for web content management software: 9.3 against 9.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #5.

Umbraco CMS offers free plan; Progress Sitefinity doesn't.

Progress Sitefinity is the better fit for mid-market and enterprise digital experiences. Umbraco CMS is the better fit for teams wanting hosted or self-hosted CMS flexibility.

  • Progress Sitefinity fits best

    Mid-market and enterprise digital experiences

  • Umbraco CMS fits best

    Teams wanting hosted or self-hosted CMS flexibility

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Progress Sitefinity 9.3/10 Visit ↗ Umbraco CMS 9.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 9.0
Ranking #2 in Web Content Management Software #5 in Web Content Management Software
Best for Mid-market and enterprise digital experiences Teams wanting hosted or self-hosted CMS flexibility
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — €45/mo
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Phone, Docs Community, Docs
Integrations 1,000+ integrations 8 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Progress Sitefinity 0/2 · Umbraco CMS 1/2
Visual page editor Not checked yet Not checked yet
Multilingual publishing Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Editorial workflow Not checked yet Not checked yet
Included users Not checked yet Not checked yet
Custom domains Not checked yet Not checked yet
Content export Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Manages structured multilingual content, media libraries and multiple sites
  • Supports headless and hybrid delivery through RESTful and GraphQL APIs
  • Adds personalization, testing and journey analytics across its feature set
  • Free open-source core includes authoring, media, and multilingual setup
  • Supports scheduled publishing, previews, versioning, and audit trails
  • Offers headless APIs and webhooks for connected delivery
Cons
  • Plan selection is quote-based rather than published with numeric prices
  • Advanced experience capabilities are tied to higher-tier packages
  • May be more than teams need for a straightforward, single-site CMS
  • Cloud plans start at €45 per month, with higher tiers costing more
  • Advanced hosting resources and support sit in paid cloud tiers
  • Customization and self-hosting may require developer involvement
Our verdict

Progress Sitefinity brings web content management together with digital asset management, personalization, experimentation and journey analytics. It is aimed at marketers, developers and enterprise content teams managing multilingual,…

Read the review →

Umbraco CMS is an open-source content management system built on Microsoft .NET. It suits developers, digital agencies, and organizations that need control over content structures and deployment. Teams can run it on Windows, macOS, or…

Read the review →
  1. Progress SitefinityWeb Content Management Software 9.3Pricing on request
  2. Umbraco CMSWeb Content Management Software 9.0Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Progress Sitefinity — where it wins

    • Manages structured multilingual content, media libraries and multiple sites
    • Supports headless and hybrid delivery through RESTful and GraphQL APIs
    • Adds personalization, testing and journey analytics across its feature set

    Where it doesn't

    • Plan selection is quote-based rather than published with numeric prices
    • Advanced experience capabilities are tied to higher-tier packages
    • May be more than teams need for a straightforward, single-site CMS
  • Umbraco CMS — where it wins

    • Free open-source core includes authoring, media, and multilingual setup
    • Supports scheduled publishing, previews, versioning, and audit trails
    • Offers headless APIs and webhooks for connected delivery

    Where it doesn't

    • Cloud plans start at €45 per month, with higher tiers costing more
    • Advanced hosting resources and support sit in paid cloud tiers
    • Customization and self-hosting may require developer involvement
  • Progress Sitefinity9.3/10 · Pricing on request

    Sitefinity combines content management, headless delivery and experience tools for larger teams.

    Visit SitefinityFull verdict →
  • Umbraco CMS9.0/10 · Free plan

    A flexible CMS for teams that want structured, multilingual content and control over hosting.

    Visit UmbracoFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update