Head-to-head · Stock Video Websites
MotionElements vs Videezy
MotionElements leads on 1 check, Videezy on 1, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreMotionElements · 8.3/10
- Free planonly Videezy
- Most featuresMotionElements · 3 of 3
MotionElements scores higher on our rubric for stock video websites: 8.3 against 7.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #7.
Videezy offers free plan; MotionElements doesn't. On buying model, Videezy gives you Credits where MotionElements offers Subscription. MotionElements offers api access; Videezy doesn't.
MotionElements is the better fit for flexible video buying and pro workflows. Videezy is the better fit for free footage with optional credit purchases.
- MotionElements fits best
Flexible video buying and pro workflows
- Videezy fits best
Free footage with optional credit purchases
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | MotionElements 8.3/10 Visit ↗ | Videezy 7.0/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.3 | 7.0 |
| Ranking | #4 in Stock Video Websites | #7 in Stock Video Websites |
| Best for | Flexible video buying and pro workflows | Free footage with optional credit purchases |
| Pricing model | Paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | — | ✓ (best) |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Phone, Docs | Email, Phone, Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market |
| Features MotionElements 3/3 · Videezy 2/3 | ||
| Commercial license | ✓ | ✓ |
| Editorial footage | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ (best) | — |
| Specs | ||
| Maximum resolution | 4k | 4k |
| License type | Royalty-free | Royalty-free |
| Buying model | Subscription | Credits |
| Monthly downloads | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | MotionElements is an online marketplace for royalty-free stock video and other creative assets, including animations, templates, music, sound effects, photos, vectors and 3D content. It serves freelancers, design agencies, corporate users… Read the review → |
Videezy is a web-based stock video library for filmmakers, creators, and businesses. It combines free Standard and Community footage with paid Pro stock footage purchased through credits. The library includes HD, Full HD, and 4K videos,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
MotionElements — where it wins
- Pay-per-item purchases start at $1 with royalty-free licensing.
- Pro plans include unlimited downloads, 4K video and AI tools.
- Integrates with major creative apps and supports API access.
Where it doesn't
- There is no free plan, despite weekly free stock downloads.
- Team plan pricing is not shown with the plan description.
- The broad asset catalog may exceed the needs of video-only buyers.
Videezy — where it wins
- Free Standard and Community footage downloads
- HD, Full HD, and 4K stock video options
- Pro content with commercial-use licensing options
Where it doesn't
- Licensing terms vary by file type
- Some free downloads may require attribution
- Web-only access with no API access
- MotionElements8.3/10 · From $1
Flexible stock video licensing with pay-per-item and unlimited Pro downloads.
Visit MotionElementsFull verdict → - Videezy7.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $19
A web-based stock video library with strong free footage and optional credit purchases.
Visit VideezyFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Coverr vs MotionElements
- Coverr vs Videezy
- Storyblocks vs MotionElements
- Storyblocks vs Videezy
- MotionElements vs Pexels
- MotionElements vs Pixabay
- MotionElements vs Mixkit
- MotionElements vs Adobe Stock
All stock video websites comparisons → · Full ranking →
Guides on stock video websites
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update