Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Manuscript Submission Software

Microsoft CMT vs Open Journal Systems

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Microsoft CMT #2 in Manuscript Submission Software 9.1/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Microsoft CMT
Open Journal Systems #4 in Manuscript Submission Software 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit site

Microsoft CMT leads on 0 checks, Open Journal Systems on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMicrosoft CMT · 9.1/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresOpen Journal Systems · 5 of 5

Microsoft CMT scores higher on our rubric for manuscript submission software: 9.1 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #4.

Microsoft CMT is the better fit for conferences needing a free, full-featured workflow. Open Journal Systems is the better fit for journals wanting free, end-to-end publishing workflows.

  • Microsoft CMT fits best

    Conferences needing a free, full-featured workflow

  • Open Journal Systems fits best

    Journals wanting free, end-to-end publishing workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Microsoft CMT 9.1/10 Visit ↗ Open Journal Systems 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 8.9
Ranking #2 in Manuscript Submission Software #4 in Manuscript Submission Software
Best for Conferences needing a free, full-featured workflow Journals wanting free, end-to-end publishing workflows
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Tickets, Docs Community, Docs
Integrations 1 integrations 11 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Microsoft CMT 0/5 · Open Journal Systems 5/5
Conference submissions Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Multi-journal management Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Configurable intake forms Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Automated email notices Not checked yet ✓ (best)
ORCID integration Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Our review
Pros
  • Supports abstracts through camera-ready papers and presentations.
  • Includes blind review, reviewer bidding, rebuttals, and review discussions.
  • Plans presentation sessions, rooms, and schedules; exports conference data.
  • Connects submission, peer review, editorial work, and production in one workflow
  • Runs one or many journals from a single installation
  • Supports indexing, researcher identifiers, and preservation integrations
Cons
  • The supplied integration is limited to TPMS.
  • Workflow breadth may exceed the needs of conferences seeking a narrower tool.
  • Conference chairs configure reviewer capacity rather than relying on a product-wide limit.
  • Conference registration and scheduling may require separate tools
  • Self-hosting requires an infrastructure choice and installation
  • Support channels are community and documentation
Our verdict

Microsoft CMT is a free, cloud-hosted web system from Microsoft Research for academic and scientific conference management. It serves conference chairs, reviewers, authors, and proceedings editors, with workflows that cover abstracts, full…

Read the review →

Open Journal Systems (OJS) is an open-source web platform for scholarly journals, intended for universities, scholarly societies, libraries, and publishing organizations. It covers the path from author submission through peer review and…

Read the review →
  1. Microsoft CMTManuscript Submission Software 9.1Free plan
  2. Open Journal SystemsManuscript Submission Software 8.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Microsoft CMT — where it wins

    • Supports abstracts through camera-ready papers and presentations.
    • Includes blind review, reviewer bidding, rebuttals, and review discussions.
    • Plans presentation sessions, rooms, and schedules; exports conference data.

    Where it doesn't

    • The supplied integration is limited to TPMS.
    • Workflow breadth may exceed the needs of conferences seeking a narrower tool.
    • Conference chairs configure reviewer capacity rather than relying on a product-wide limit.
  • Open Journal Systems — where it wins

    • Connects submission, peer review, editorial work, and production in one workflow
    • Runs one or many journals from a single installation
    • Supports indexing, researcher identifiers, and preservation integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Conference registration and scheduling may require separate tools
    • Self-hosting requires an infrastructure choice and installation
    • Support channels are community and documentation
  • Microsoft CMT9.1/10 · Free plan

    A free conference workflow spanning submissions, peer review, and presentation planning.

    Visit Microsoft CMTFull verdict →
  • Open Journal Systems8.9/10 · Free plan

    A free, open-source system for managing journal submissions through publication.

    Visit siteFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update