JSTOR vs arXiv

JSTOR9.1Visit arXiv8.1Visit

Higher score JSTOR #4 in Academic Research Databases 9.1/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit JSTOR

vs

arXiv #14 in Academic Research Databases 8.1/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 5 features Visit arXiv

• JSTOR fits best

  Full-text academic research collections

• arXiv fits best

  Free scholarly paper access and APIs

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	JSTOR 9.1/10 Visit ↗	arXiv 8.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.1	8.1
Ranking	#4 in Academic Research Databases	#14 in Academic Research Databases
Best for	Full-text academic research collections	Free scholarly paper access and APIs
Pricing model	Free plan + paid	Free
Starting price	—	Free plan
Free plan	✓	✓
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud
Platforms	Web	Web
Support	Email, Docs	Email, Docs
Built for	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features JSTOR 5/5 · arXiv 3/5
Full-text access	✓	✓
Advanced search	✓	✓
Theses and dissertations	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Conference proceedings	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Institutional access	✓	✓
Specs
Subject coverage	Multidisciplinary	Multidisciplinary
Content types	journals, books, book chapters, research reports, theses, dissertations, documents, images, audio, video, panoramas, serials	scholarly articles
Our review
Pros	Multidisciplinary access to journals, books, media, and primary sources Advanced filters support precise full-text research discovery Workspace and citation tools help organize saved research	Free reading and submission with full-text scholarly articles Advanced search and browsing across eight research areas API access for machine retrieval and research workflows
Cons	Personal reading plans limit PDF downloads Web access is the only listed platform Institutional pricing is customized by institution and classification	Covers scholarly articles rather than broader research content Submissions are moderated but not peer-reviewed by arXiv Subject coverage is limited to eight research areas
Our verdict	JSTOR is a digital research library for students, educators, independent researchers, libraries, and other institutions. Its collection spans academic journals, books, book chapters, research reports, theses, dissertations, documents,… Read the review →	arXiv is a free research-sharing platform and open-access archive for scholarly articles. It is designed for researchers and readers who need to discover, retrieve, read, submit, and distribute academic papers online. Coverage spans… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• JSTOR — where it wins

  • Multidisciplinary access to journals, books, media, and primary sources
  • Advanced filters support precise full-text research discovery
  • Workspace and citation tools help organize saved research

  Where it doesn't

  • Personal reading plans limit PDF downloads
  • Web access is the only listed platform
  • Institutional pricing is customized by institution and classification

• arXiv — where it wins

  • Free reading and submission with full-text scholarly articles
  • Advanced search and browsing across eight research areas
  • API access for machine retrieval and research workflows

  Where it doesn't

  • Covers scholarly articles rather than broader research content
  • Submissions are moderated but not peer-reviewed by arXiv
  • Subject coverage is limited to eight research areas

• JSTOR9.1/10 · Free plan

  A broad, full-text academic collection with flexible personal and institutional access.

  Visit JSTORFull verdict →
• arXiv8.1/10 · Free plan

  A free scholarly article archive with search, full-text access, submission, and APIs.

  Visit arXivFull verdict →