Head-to-head · Stock Market software
Investing.com vs FINVIZ
Investing.com leads on 0 checks, FINVIZ on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreFINVIZ · 8.0/10
- Free planboth
Our editors rank Investing.com at #4 and FINVIZ at #5 for stock market software; Investing.com has no rubric score yet (facts researched, not yet scored), so the checks below decide.
On mobile apps, FINVIZ gives you Web_only where Investing.com offers Ios_android.
Investing.com is the better fit for mobile market research and alerts. FINVIZ is the better fit for fast stock screening and market scans.
- Investing.com fits best
Mobile market research and alerts
- FINVIZ fits best
Fast stock screening and market scans
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Investing.com —/10 Visit ↗ | FINVIZ 8.0/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | — | 8.0 |
| Ranking | #4 in Stock Market software | #5 in Stock Market software |
| Best for | Mobile market research and alerts | Fast stock screening and market scans |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Not published | $39.5/user/mo |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Mobile | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Support | Docs | Email, Docs |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market | Solo, Small business, Mid-market |
| Features Investing.com 4/5 · FINVIZ 4/5 | ||
| Real-time quotes | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stock screeners | ✓ | ✓ |
| Paper trading | Not published | Not published |
| Portfolio tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Price alerts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Watchlists limit | Not published | Not published |
| Mobile apps | Ios_android | Web_only |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Investing.com brings market data, quotes, charts, news and research tools together for retail investors and traders. Its coverage spans multiple asset classes, while stock screeners, portfolios, watchlists, alerts and calendars support… Read the review → |
FINVIZ is a web-based stock-market research platform for individual investors, traders and analysts. It combines fundamental and technical screening with interactive charts, market maps, news aggregation, insider-trading activity views,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Investing.com — where it wins
- Quotes and market data cover multiple asset classes.
- Screens stocks with financial and technical filters plus preset screens.
- Tracks portfolios and watchlists with customized price and event alerts.
Where it doesn't
- InvestingPro is a paid subscription for additional research features.
- The product’s broad coverage may be more than investors seeking a narrow tool need.
- Support channels listed are limited to documentation.
FINVIZ — where it wins
- Fundamental and technical filters support targeted stock discovery
- Charts, market maps, news and insider activity combine in one workspace
- Elite adds real-time quotes, alerts and historical backtesting
Where it doesn't
- Advanced analytics and real-time quotes require an Elite subscription
- Access is web-only, with no native mobile app
- Built for research rather than brokerage trade execution
- Investing.com—/10 · Free plan
A broad market research toolkit with screening, tracking and alerts on web and mobile.
Visit Investing.comFull verdict → - FINVIZ8.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $39.50/user/mo
Fast browser-based screening and market research, with real-time tools reserved for Elite.
Visit FINVIZFull verdict →
More comparisons
- TradingView vs Investing.com
- TradingView vs FINVIZ
- moomoo vs Investing.com
- moomoo vs FINVIZ
- NinjaTrader vs Investing.com
- NinjaTrader vs FINVIZ
- Investing.com vs StockCharts
- Investing.com vs TC2000
All stock market software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026




