Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Web Archiving Software

InnoARCHIVE vs NDL Web Archiving Project (WARP)

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score InnoARCHIVE #4 in Web Archiving Software 8.5/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 2 features Visit InnoARCHIVE

InnoARCHIVE leads on 0 checks, NDL Web Archiving Project (WARP) on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreInnoARCHIVE · 8.5/10
  • Most featuresNDL Web Archiving Project (WARP) · 2 of 2

InnoARCHIVE scores higher on our rubric for web archiving software: 8.5 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #5.

InnoARCHIVE is the better fit for teams managing searchable web archives. NDL Web Archiving Project (WARP) is the better fit for researchers searching Japan’s national web archive.

  • InnoARCHIVE fits best

    Teams managing searchable web archives

  • NDL Web Archiving Project (WARP) fits best

    Researchers searching Japan’s national web archive

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature InnoARCHIVE 8.5/10 Visit ↗ NDL Web Archiving Project (WARP) 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.5 7.9
Ranking #4 in Web Archiving Software #5 in Web Archiving Software
Best for Teams managing searchable web archives Researchers searching Japan’s national web archive
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price — Not checked yet
Free plan Not checked yet Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Phone Docs
Integrations 6 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Enterprise
Features InnoARCHIVE 0/2 · NDL Web Archiving Project (WARP) 2/2
Snapshot capture Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Archive search Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Capture methods Not checked yet Automated web crawler operated by NDL; not a user-submitted URL capture tool
Preservation controls Not checked yet NDL-managed recurring crawl schedules; access may be online or limited to NDL premises; collection eligibility depends on law or publisher permission
Supported content Not checked yet HTML, PDF, Microsoft Word, RTF, Excel, CSV, TSV, PowerPoint, text, EPUB; some formats and dynamic or very large content may not be archived
Browser or API access Not checked yet Memento TimeMap and TimeGate API endpoints; browser access using current Chrome, Firefox, or Edge
Our review
Pros
  • Scheduled and manual crawls with static and Playwright-based capture
  • Validated WARC export, indexed search, and calendar-based time travel
  • Configurable retention with cloud or self-hosted deployment
  • Search archived page content with detailed filters for dates, publishers, and formats.
  • Browse archived versions and view capture dates and website metadata.
  • Access archive resources through Memento TimeMap and TimeGate endpoints.
Cons
  • Pricing is on request across all plans
  • Starter archives weekly and uses standard quality scans
  • Advanced features such as SSO/SAML are limited to Enterprise
  • Does not let users submit arbitrary URLs for capture.
  • Access to some archived material is limited to NDL premises.
  • Some formats, dynamic pages, and very large content may not be archived.
Our verdict

InnoARCHIVE combines website and public social-media archiving with governance and monitoring features for organizations managing multiple sites. It is aimed at public bodies, financial organizations, education, healthcare, archive…

Read the review →

WARP is the National Diet Library of Japan’s web archive, collecting and preserving websites such as public institutions’ sites and selected sites archived with publishers’ permission. It is suited to researchers and other visitors looking…

Read the review →
  1. InnoARCHIVEWeb Archiving Software 8.5Pricing on request
  2. NDL Web Archiving Project (WARP)Web Archiving Software 7.9Free

Strengths and trade-offs

  • InnoARCHIVE — where it wins

    • Scheduled and manual crawls with static and Playwright-based capture
    • Validated WARC export, indexed search, and calendar-based time travel
    • Configurable retention with cloud or self-hosted deployment

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is on request across all plans
    • Starter archives weekly and uses standard quality scans
    • Advanced features such as SSO/SAML are limited to Enterprise
  • NDL Web Archiving Project (WARP) — where it wins

    • Search archived page content with detailed filters for dates, publishers, and formats.
    • Browse archived versions and view capture dates and website metadata.
    • Access archive resources through Memento TimeMap and TimeGate endpoints.

    Where it doesn't

    • Does not let users submit arbitrary URLs for capture.
    • Access to some archived material is limited to NDL premises.
    • Some formats, dynamic pages, and very large content may not be archived.
  • InnoARCHIVE8.5/10 · Pricing on request

    A configurable archive for organizations managing multiple websites and public social media.

    Visit InnoARCHIVEFull verdict →
  • NDL Web Archiving Project (WARP)7.9/10 · Free

    A free national web archive for searching preserved websites, not submitting arbitrary URLs.

    Visit WARPFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update