Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Crew Scheduling Software

EZ-OPUS vs HASTUS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 8 checks side by side
Higher score EZ-OPUS #3 in Crew Scheduling Software 9.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 6 of 7 features Visit EZ-OPUS
HASTUS #7 in Crew Scheduling Software 8.5/10 Pricing on request ✓ 7 of 7 features Visit GIRO

EZ-OPUS leads on 0 checks, HASTUS on 0, and 8 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 8 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreEZ-OPUS · 9.0/10
  • Most featuresHASTUS · 7 of 7

EZ-OPUS scores higher on our rubric for crew scheduling software: 9.0 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.

EZ-OPUS is the better fit for airlines needing analytics-heavy crew planning. HASTUS is the better fit for transit operators planning duties and rosters.

  • EZ-OPUS fits best

    Airlines needing analytics-heavy crew planning

  • HASTUS fits best

    Transit operators planning duties and rosters

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature EZ-OPUS 9.0/10 Visit ↗ HASTUS 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.5
Ranking #3 in Crew Scheduling Software #7 in Crew Scheduling Software
Best for Airlines needing analytics-heavy crew planning Transit operators planning duties and rosters
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price — Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Email Email, Phone, Tickets
Integrations 17+ integrations 8 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features EZ-OPUS 6/7 · HASTUS 7/7
Duty-time rules ✓ ✓
Qualification tracking ✓ ✓
Fatigue management ✓ ✓
Mobile access Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Trip assignment ✓ ✓
Availability management ✓ ✓
API access ✓ ✓
Our review
Pros
  • FTL compliance for 10+ aviation authorities
  • Fatigue modeling and Monte Carlo workforce forecasting
  • Roster, qualification, training and disruption workflows in one platform
  • Optimizes vehicle and crew schedules across road and rail operations
  • Connects with AVL, APC, ticketing, HR, payroll, and passenger systems
  • Covers rosters, dispatch, leave, assignments, and employee self-service
Cons
  • Requires a sales conversation for pricing
  • No free plan is available
  • The 69-module scope may exceed narrow scheduling needs
  • Pricing requires contact with sales
  • The feature breadth may exceed the needs of smaller operators
  • Its focus is public transportation rather than general workforce scheduling
Our verdict

EZ-OPUS is a cloud-based airline operations platform for airlines and other aviation operators. Its crew scheduling capabilities cover roster generation, duty assignments, rest periods, day-off patterns, leave, standby, reserves,…

Read the review →

HASTUS is an integrated scheduling and operations suite for bus, metro, tram, and passenger rail services. GIRO Inc. positions it for public transport agencies and operators managing complex services across road and rail networks. The…

Read the review →
  1. EZ-OPUSCrew Scheduling Software 9.0Pricing on request
  2. HASTUSCrew Scheduling Software 8.5Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • EZ-OPUS — where it wins

    • FTL compliance for 10+ aviation authorities
    • Fatigue modeling and Monte Carlo workforce forecasting
    • Roster, qualification, training and disruption workflows in one platform

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires a sales conversation for pricing
    • No free plan is available
    • The 69-module scope may exceed narrow scheduling needs
  • HASTUS — where it wins

    • Optimizes vehicle and crew schedules across road and rail operations
    • Connects with AVL, APC, ticketing, HR, payroll, and passenger systems
    • Covers rosters, dispatch, leave, assignments, and employee self-service

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contact with sales
    • The feature breadth may exceed the needs of smaller operators
    • Its focus is public transportation rather than general workforce scheduling
  • EZ-OPUS9.0/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad airline operations suite for analytics-heavy crew planning and compliance.

    Visit EZ-OPUSFull verdict →
  • HASTUS8.5/10 · Pricing on request

    A wide-ranging transit suite for coordinating vehicles, crews, rosters, and daily operations.

    Visit GIROFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update