Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Content Management Systems

Drupal vs Concrete CMS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 7 checks side by side
Higher score Drupal #1 in Content Management Systems 9.4/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 6 of 6 features Visit Drupal
Concrete CMS #49 in Content Management Systems 4.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 6 features Visit Concrete CMS

Drupal leads on 0 checks, Concrete CMS on 0, and 7 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreDrupal · 9.4/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresDrupal · 6 of 6

Drupal scores higher on our rubric for content management systems: 9.4 against 4.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #49.

Drupal is the better fit for complex structured and editorial content. Concrete CMS is the better fit for visual editing for small-to-midsize sites.

  • Drupal fits best

    Complex structured and editorial content

  • Concrete CMS fits best

    Visual editing for small-to-midsize sites

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Drupal 9.4/10 Visit ↗ Concrete CMS 4.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 4.0
Ranking #1 in Content Management Systems #49 in Content Management Systems
Best for Complex structured and editorial content Visual editing for small-to-midsize sites
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Community, Docs Community, Docs
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Drupal 6/6 · Concrete CMS 5/6
Editorial workflows ✓ ✓
Custom user roles ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Multilingual content ✓ ✓
SEO tools ✓ ✓
Media library ✓ ✓
Custom content types ✓ ✓
Specs
Platform type Hybrid Hybrid
Our review
Pros
  • Configurable content types and fields support deep structured content.
  • Editorial workflows, custom permissions, and multilingual support are built in.
  • API-first options, visual building, media, SEO, and enterprise integrations.️
  • In-context editing with drag-and-drop reusable blocks
  • Structured page types, permissions, approvals, and multilingual content
  • Free, MIT-licensed self-hosted CMS with optional managed hosting
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployments add hosting and maintenance responsibilities.
  • Advanced implementations can require developer or agency involvement.
  • Its broad feature set may exceed the needs of simpler websites.
  • Integration coverage is limited to popular CRMs
  • Starter includes one site editor
  • Advanced custom codebase support requires the Custom SLA plan
Our verdict

Drupal is a free, open-source content management platform for websites and digital experiences. It is designed for developers, agencies, and organizations that need configurable content models, custom architecture, integrations, and…

Read the review →

Concrete CMS is a web content management system for creating, editing, organizing, and publishing websites. It is aimed at site owners, content teams, agencies, and developers who need visual editing alongside structured content…

Read the review →
  1. DrupalContent Management Systems 9.4Free plan
  2. Concrete CMSContent Management Systems 4.0Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Drupal — where it wins

    • Configurable content types and fields support deep structured content.
    • Editorial workflows, custom permissions, and multilingual support are built in.
    • API-first options, visual building, media, SEO, and enterprise integrations.️

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployments add hosting and maintenance responsibilities.
    • Advanced implementations can require developer or agency involvement.
    • Its broad feature set may exceed the needs of simpler websites.

  • Concrete CMS — where it wins

    • In-context editing with drag-and-drop reusable blocks
    • Structured page types, permissions, approvals, and multilingual content
    • Free, MIT-licensed self-hosted CMS with optional managed hosting

    Where it doesn't

    • Integration coverage is limited to popular CRMs
    • Starter includes one site editor
    • Advanced custom codebase support requires the Custom SLA plan

More comparisons

All content management systems comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update