Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Markdown Editors

Dillinger vs MarkText

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Dillinger #4 in Markdown Editors 8.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 3 features Visit Dillinger
MarkText #5 in Markdown Editors 8.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 3 features Visit MarkText

Dillinger leads on 0 checks, MarkText on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreDillinger · 8.7/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresDillinger · 2 of 3

Dillinger scores higher on our rubric for markdown editors: 8.7 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #5.

Dillinger is the better fit for free browser-based editing with cloud files. MarkText is the better fit for free cross-platform Markdown writing.

  • Dillinger fits best

    Free browser-based editing with cloud files

  • MarkText fits best

    Free cross-platform Markdown writing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Dillinger 8.7/10 Visit ↗ MarkText 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.5
Ranking #4 in Markdown Editors #5 in Markdown Editors
Best for Free browser-based editing with cloud files Free cross-platform Markdown writing
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Desktop
Platforms Web Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Docs Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features Dillinger 2/3 · MarkText 1/3
Real-time collaboration Not checked yet Not checked yet
Cloud sync ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Local file support ✓ ✓
Specs
Supported platforms web windows, macos, linux
Export formats Markdown, HTML, PDF HTML, PDF
Publishing workflow Not checked yet None
Markdown flavor Not checked yet Custom
Our review
Pros
  • Monaco editor with syntax highlighting, cursors, search, and autocompletion
  • Live side-by-side preview with synchronized scrolling
  • Cloud connections plus Markdown, HTML, and PDF export
  • Realtime WYSIWYG and source-code editing modes
  • CommonMark, GFM, math, tables, and diagrams
  • Free, open source, and available on three desktop platforms
Cons
  • Available as a web application rather than a desktop editor
  • Offline core editing starts only after the initial load
  • Export options are limited to Markdown, styled HTML, and PDF
  • No built-in publishing workflow
  • Desktop, local-file workflow rather than cloud collaboration
  • HTML and PDF are the listed export formats
Our verdict

Dillinger is a free, open-source Markdown editor that runs in the browser. It is aimed at developers, technical writers, and other users creating README files, documentation, blog posts, or structured prompts. Core editing requires no…

Read the review →

MarkText is a free, open-source desktop Markdown editor for writers, developers, and documentation teams who prefer working with local files. It runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, combining realtime WYSIWYG rendering with a source-code…

Read the review →
  1. DillingerMarkdown Editors 8.7Free plan
  2. MarkTextMarkdown Editors 8.5Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Dillinger — where it wins

    • Monaco editor with syntax highlighting, cursors, search, and autocompletion
    • Live side-by-side preview with synchronized scrolling
    • Cloud connections plus Markdown, HTML, and PDF export

    Where it doesn't

    • Available as a web application rather than a desktop editor
    • Offline core editing starts only after the initial load
    • Export options are limited to Markdown, styled HTML, and PDF
  • MarkText — where it wins

    • Realtime WYSIWYG and source-code editing modes
    • CommonMark, GFM, math, tables, and diagrams
    • Free, open source, and available on three desktop platforms

    Where it doesn't

    • No built-in publishing workflow
    • Desktop, local-file workflow rather than cloud collaboration
    • HTML and PDF are the listed export formats

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update