Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Citation Generator Tools

CiteMe vs CitePlain

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score CiteMe #2 in Citation Generator Tools 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit CiteMe
CitePlain #7 in Citation Generator Tools 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit CitePlain

CiteMe leads on 0 checks, CitePlain on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreCiteMe · 9.3/10
  • Free planboth

CiteMe scores higher on our rubric for citation generator tools: 9.3 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #7.

CiteMe is the better fit for researchers needing scholarly-source and import depth. CitePlain is the better fit for free batch citation work with BibTeX output.

  • CiteMe fits best

    Researchers needing scholarly-source and import depth

  • CitePlain fits best

    Free batch citation work with BibTeX output

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature CiteMe 9.3/10 Visit ↗ CitePlain 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.3 8.8
Ranking #2 in Citation Generator Tools #7 in Citation Generator Tools
Best for Researchers needing scholarly-source and import depth Free batch citation work with BibTeX output
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — $39/yr
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Money-back guarantee 7 days 30 days
Deployment Cloud, Browser extension Cloud, Browser extension
Platforms Web, Chrome extension Web, Chrome extension
Support Email, Docs Email
Compliance GDPR GDPR
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features CiteMe 5/5 · CitePlain 5/5
Identifier lookup ✓ ✓
URL import ✓ ✓
Browser extension ✓ ✓
Word add-in ✓ ✓
BibTeX export ✓ ✓
Specs
Citation style count 10000 Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Looks up references by DOI, ISBN, URL, PMID, title, or topic
  • Supports PDF, bibliography, BibTeX, and RIS imports
  • Offers Word, Google Docs, and broad browser support
  • Free tier covers six citation styles and six source types
  • Batch bibliographies support up to 50 sources
  • BibTeX export uses stable cite keys
Cons
  • Free Reference Checker access is limited to 3 checks per month
  • 10,000+ styles and batch PDF import require Pro access
  • Weekly Pro access renews until canceled
  • Cloud synchronization is reserved for Pro plans
  • The Free plan uses a device-local browser library
  • Word and Google Docs add-ins are shipping soon
Our verdict

CiteMe is a web-based citation generator for students, researchers, and academic writers who need more than manual formatting. It searches academic databases and generates references from DOIs, ISBNs, URLs, PMIDs, titles, or topics.…

Read the review →

CitePlain is a browser-based citation generator for students, researchers, and writers who need references from web pages, journal articles, books, tweets, YouTube videos, and podcasts. It accepts URLs, DOIs, and ISBNs, then produces…

Read the review →
  1. CiteMeCitation Generator Tools 9.3Free plan
  2. CitePlainCitation Generator Tools 8.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • CiteMe — where it wins

    • Looks up references by DOI, ISBN, URL, PMID, title, or topic
    • Supports PDF, bibliography, BibTeX, and RIS imports
    • Offers Word, Google Docs, and broad browser support

    Where it doesn't

    • Free Reference Checker access is limited to 3 checks per month
    • 10,000+ styles and batch PDF import require Pro access
    • Weekly Pro access renews until canceled
  • CitePlain — where it wins

    • Free tier covers six citation styles and six source types
    • Batch bibliographies support up to 50 sources
    • BibTeX export uses stable cite keys

    Where it doesn't

    • Cloud synchronization is reserved for Pro plans
    • The Free plan uses a device-local browser library
    • Word and Google Docs add-ins are shipping soon

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update