Recommended Free Tools
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Betelgeuse and Antares are both cool, luminous red supergiants that can be seen without a telescope, but they occupy different constellations and have been studied in different ways. Betelgeuse marks Orion’s shoulder, while Antares lies in Scorpius. NASA’s 2023 explainer gives Betelgeuse a diameter of about 700 times the Sun’s and a mass of about 15 Suns; an ESO release gives Antares a diameter of about 700 solar diameters and a mass of about 12 Suns. Those rounded, source-specific estimates do not establish a dependable size or mass winner.
The clearest scientific contrast is observational. NASA describes Betelgeuse as a semiregular variable with cycles near 400 days and five years, and connects its dramatic 2019 fading to a surface mass ejection. ESO’s work on Antares instead mapped motions in its extended atmosphere and found unexpected turbulence. Both stars are late in their evolution and are expected eventually to end as supernovae, but none of these sources predicts that either explosion is imminent.
Betelgeuse and Antares at a glance
The two stars look similar because both are red supergiants: very large, cool, luminous stars in an advanced stage of stellar evolution. Their red-orange appearance and naked-eye visibility make them easy to compare, yet the available measurements are not a single, matched experiment. The values below come from separate institutional summaries published in different years.
| Comparison | Betelgeuse | Antares | What the evidence supports |
|---|---|---|---|
| Common name and designation | Betelgeuse, also called Alpha Orionis | Antares | Different stars in different constellations |
| Constellation | Orion | Scorpius | A firm sky-location distinction |
| Visibility | Naked-eye star | Naked-eye star | No telescope is required to see either one under a suitable sky |
| Approximate diameter | About 700 times the Sun’s size, in NASA’s 2023 explainer | About 700 times the Sun’s diameter, in ESO’s 2017 release | Similar rounded estimates; no reliable winner |
| Approximate mass | About 15 solar masses, NASA, 2023 | About 12 solar masses, ESO, 2017 | Separate estimates, not a controlled head-to-head analysis |
| Surface temperature | About 3,300 °C, NASA, 2023 | Not stated as a matched number in the cited ESO release | Both are described as comparatively cool red supergiants; a numerical ranking is not established |
| Variability information in these sources | Semiregular cycles of roughly 400 days and five years | Atmospheric motion and turbulence are documented; no directly comparable cycle is supplied | Do not treat the absence of a cycle figure as proof that Antares is non-variable |
| Distance | About 700 light-years in NASA’s 2023 explainer; roughly 548 light-years in a NASA 2024 observing article | Not stated in the consulted sources | No defensible closer-star verdict from this source set |
| Recent notable result | ESO reported strong evidence for a companion in 2026 | ESO’s 2017 VLTI observations mapped its surface and atmosphere | Different research questions, not a direct contest |
What makes both stars red supergiants?
A red supergiant is an evolved star that has expanded enormously and has a relatively cool visible surface compared with hotter, bluer stars. “Cool” is relative here: the surface remains hot by everyday standards, but its lower stellar temperature shifts much of the visible light toward red and orange wavelengths. The class is also intrinsically luminous because the expanded star radiates across a huge surface area.
#1 Best Overall
- Read Before You Buy — No Video Output: These adapters support charging and USB 2.0 data transfer, but cannot transmit video signals. Except for standard USB webcams (which use USB data only), they are not compatible with HDMI/DisplayPort cables, video-capable USB-C hubs, or docking stations with video output.
- Convert USB-A Ports to USB-C: Designed to connect USB-C earphones, cables, flash drives, card readers, and other USB-C accessories to standard USB-A ports. Plug-and-play with no drivers or software required.
- Aluminum Alloy Housing: Built with a sturdy aluminum alloy shell that aids in heat dissipation and protects against daily wear and scratches. Designed to maintain a stable and secure connection.
- Compact & Travel-Friendly: The ultra-compact design allows the adapter to stay plugged into your device without blocking adjacent ports or adding bulk, reducing wear and tear on your original USB ports.
- 12-Month Warranty: Backed by a 12-month manufacturer warranty for peace of mind. Designed to meet strict quality control standards for reliable everyday performance.
Betelgeuse and Antares are therefore related types of object, not two stages of the same star. Their similar color does not mean that their masses, distances, atmospheric structures or evolutionary histories are identical. Measurements of each star also come from different instruments, models and publication dates, so apparently similar numbers should not be treated as precision measurements of equality.
Where are Betelgeuse and Antares in the sky?
Betelgeuse: Orion’s shoulder
Betelgeuse is the star commonly identified as marking one of Orion’s shoulders. NASA also gives it the designation Alpha Orionis. Orion is one of the most recognizable constellations, so the star’s location is the easiest practical way to distinguish it from Antares: find Orion’s familiar pattern and look for the strongly orange-red star at the shoulder.
Antares: the heart of Scorpius
Antares is in Scorpius, a separate constellation whose outline is often described as scorpion-shaped. Its name and color can invite comparisons with Mars, but the important point for this question is positional: Antares is not in Orion and will not appear beside Betelgeuse in the same constellation pattern.
Windows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallOutdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchCan you see both without equipment?
Yes. Both are naked-eye stars. A seasonal star chart or planisphere can help you identify Orion and Scorpius, but binoculars or a telescope are not prerequisites for seeing either red supergiant. Their visibility at a particular time depends on season, latitude, local horizon and sky brightness, so an observing plan should use a chart appropriate to your location rather than assuming both are above the horizon together.
Are they the same size?
The short answer is that the cited summaries make them look similar in size, but they do not prove a tie or identify a winner.
Betelgeuse’s estimate
NASA’s 2023 “What is Betelgeuse?” explainer describes Betelgeuse as about 700 times the Sun’s size. In a red supergiant context, that is a rounded scale estimate, not a claim that the star’s boundary can be measured like the edge of a solid ball.
Rank #2
- 5-in-1 USB-C Hub: Experience comprehensive connectivity featuring a Power Delivery input, two USB-A 2.0 ports, a USB-A 3.0 port, and an HDMI port. (Note: The USB-C power delivery input port is only for connecting an external wall charger to power your laptop and cannot power peripheral devices.)
- 90W Pass-Through Charging: Achieve optimal charging with 90W pass-through power to your laptop, supported by a total input of 100W, with the hub reserving 10W for operational efficiency. (Note: Wall charger not included.)
- Quick Data Transfers: Accelerate your productivity with rapid data transfers using a high-speed 5Gbps USB 3.0 port and two 480Mbps USB 2.0 ports.
- 4K HDMI Display: Enhance your visual experience with a hub capable of delivering 4K resolution at 30Hz in both mirror and extend modes. Please note that this hub is compatible with MacBook (macOS 12 and newer), Windows 10 and 11, ChromeOS, and laptops equipped with DP Alt Mode and Power Delivery. Note: This device is not compatible with Linux.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (5-in-1, 4K HDMI), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
Antares’s estimate
ESO’s 2017 release gives Antares a diameter of about 700 times the Sun’s diameter. The wording is similarly approximate and comes from a different institution and analysis.
Why “which is bigger?” has no firm answer here
Red supergiants have extended, changing atmospheres. The apparent edge depends on the wavelength and measurement method, while the inferred physical diameter also depends on distance and modeling. Because the two quoted values are rounded to the same order and were not obtained as a harmonized comparison, saying that Betelgeuse is definitively larger—or that Antares is—would claim more precision than the evidence supports.
Which star is more massive?
The published figures point in different directions from the diameter question, but they must be read with the same caution.
Betelgeuse: about 15 Suns
NASA’s 2023 explainer gives Betelgeuse an approximate mass of 15 solar masses. “Solar masses” means a comparison with the mass of the Sun, not a direct weighing; astronomers infer stellar mass from observations and models.
Antares: about 12 Suns
ESO’s 2017 release reports about 12 solar masses for Antares. That estimate is also approximate and belongs to ESO’s specific source context.
On those individual summaries alone, Betelgeuse’s quoted mass is higher. It would be misleading, however, to present 15 versus 12 as a controlled measurement showing that Betelgeuse is certainly more massive. The figures were not published as a matched analysis using the same assumptions, and the source set does not provide uncertainty ranges that would support a precision ranking.
Rank #3
- Sleek 7-in-1 USB-C Hub: Features an HDMI port, two USB-A 3.0 ports, and a USB-C data port, each providing 5Gbps transfer speeds. It also includes a USB-C PD input port for charging up to 100W and dual SD and TF card slots, all in a compact design.
- Flawless 4K@60Hz Video with HDMI: Delivers exceptional clarity and smoothness with its 4K@60Hz HDMI port, making it ideal for high-definition presentations and entertainment. (Note: Only the HDMI port supports video projection; the USB-C port is for data transfer only.)
- Double Up on Efficiency: The two USB-A 3.0 ports and a USB-C port support a fast 5Gbps data rate, significantly boosting your transfer speeds and improving productivity.
- Fast and Reliable 85W Charging: Offers high-capacity, speedy charging for laptops up to 85W, so you spend less time tethered to an outlet and more time being productive.
- What You Get: Anker USB-C Hub (7-in-1), welcome guide, 18-month warranty, and our friendly customer service.
Which one is hotter?
NASA gives Betelgeuse a surface temperature of about 3,300 °C in its 2023 explainer. The cited ESO Antares release describes Antares as a comparatively cool red supergiant but does not provide a matched numerical temperature.
That means the sources support the broad statement that both stars are cool relative to hotter stellar classes, but they do not support a numerical Betelgeuse-versus-Antares temperature ranking. A missing Antares number is not evidence that Antares has no measurable temperature or that it must be cooler.
Which star changes brightness more clearly?
Betelgeuse’s documented cycles
NASA calls Betelgeuse a semiregular variable. Its brightness commonly follows a cycle of roughly 400 days, with another longer variation around five years. “Semiregular” signals that the pattern is not a perfectly repeating clock; the timing and amplitude can vary.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →The 2019 deep dimming
Betelgeuse attracted unusual attention when it faded dramatically in 2019. NASA’s later account links the event to a surface mass ejection: material was expelled from the star, cooled and formed dust that temporarily blocked some of the light reaching observers. The episode is consistent with Betelgeuse’s volatile outer layers, not with a confirmed prediction of imminent core collapse.
What is—and is not—said about Antares
The cited Antares material focuses on motions in the star’s atmosphere rather than supplying a directly comparable brightness cycle. It would be wrong to turn that omission into the statement that Antares is constant or non-variable. The defensible comparison is narrower: Betelgeuse has the better-documented cycle information in these sources, while the Antares release emphasizes atmospheric dynamics.
What did astronomers see in Antares’s atmosphere?
ESO reported that observations with the Very Large Telescope Interferometer (VLTI) mapped Antares’s surface and the motions of gas in its extended atmosphere. The measurements revealed unexpected turbulence. Instead of a simple, quietly expanding shell, the atmosphere contains complex motions that help explain why material can be transported far from the visible surface.
Rank #4
- Dual Converters, Infinite Potential：Includes 2× USB C male to USB A female adapters and 2× USB A male to USB C female adapters. Perfect for a wide range of uses—tablets with Bluetooth keyboards, expand USB ports on macbook, and more. Two different converters for all your daily needs
- Next-Level 10Gbps & 3A Charging: No more slow 480Mbps, this usb to usb c adapter has a transfer speed of up to 10Gbps, allowing you to do more transferring in less time. This usb adapter fits both USB A and USB C charger, supporting up to 3A fast charging
- Upgraded Exquisite Craftsmanship: With an aluminum alloy housing and metal connector, the usbc to usb adapter is extremely durable and sturdy. Rigorously tested to withstand more than 10,000 times of plugging and unplugging, ensuring long-lasting performance
- Broad Compatible: The usb c to usb adapter widely supports all USB C/ USB A devices like laptops, tablets, cellphones, car chargers, and phone chargers. Such as compatible with MacBook Pro/Air 2023/2022, Thunderbolt 4/3 Devices,Apple MagSafe Watch 9/8/7/SE/Ultra, iPad Pro 2022/2021, Samsung Galaxy S23/S20/S10, and iPhone 17/16/15 Pro. Plug and play
- Please Note: To reach 10Gbps speed, keep the cable under 3.3 ft. For USB A Male to USB C adapters, try flipping the USB C connector. USB C Male to USB A adapters support bidirectional 10Gbps transfer within 3.3 ft
The result matters because mass loss is central to the final evolution of a red supergiant. Keiichi Ohnaka, lead author of the Antares study, described the long-standing problem this way: “How stars like Antares lose mass so quickly in the final phase of their evolution has been a problem for over half a century,”
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →This is a different kind of evidence from Betelgeuse’s light curve and 2019 dimming. Betelgeuse’s story in the cited sources is dominated by changing brightness and an observed ejection; Antares’s is illuminated by spatially resolved measurements of surface and atmospheric motion. Neither observation by itself supplies a complete account of how either star will die.
Which star is closer?
The available figures do not justify naming a closer star.
NASA’s 2023 Betelgeuse explainer says the star is about 700 light-years away. A separate NASA observing article published in 2024 gives a rough estimate of about 548 light-years. The difference illustrates that distance values can change with the source, data set and method. The consulted sources do not provide a comparable Antares distance, so there is no like-for-like basis for declaring Betelgeuse or Antares closer.
Distance also affects how apparent size and brightness are interpreted. A star can look prominent because it is intrinsically luminous, relatively nearby, or both. Without matched distances and luminosities for these two stars, visual prominence is not a reliable shortcut to a winner.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Which one is brighter or more luminous?
The cited comparison does not supply a common luminosity measurement for both stars. Brightness as seen from Earth and intrinsic luminosity are different quantities: the first depends on distance and observing conditions, while the second describes the star’s own energy output. Because the source set lacks a matched luminosity table and does not attach a controlled apparent-brightness comparison to both objects, this article does not rank them as brighter or more luminous.
Best Value
- 5-in-1 Connectivity: Equipped with a 4K HDMI port, a 5 Gbps USB-C data port, two 5 Gbps USB-A ports, and a USB C 100W PD-IN port. Note: The USB C 100W PD-IN port supports only charging and does not support data transfer devices such as headphones or speakers.
- Powerful Pass-Through Charging: Supports up to 85W pass-through charging so you can power up your laptop while you use the hub. Note: Pass-through charging requires a charger (not included). Note: To achieve full power for iPad, we recommend using a 45W wall charger.
- Transfer Files in Seconds: Move files to and from your laptop at speeds of up to 5 Gbps via the USB-C and USB-A data ports. Note: The USB C 5Gbps Data port does not support video output.
- HD Display: Connect to the HDMI port to stream or mirror content to an external monitor in resolutions of up to 4K@30Hz. Note: The USB-C ports do not support video output.
- What You Get: Anker 332 USB-C Hub (5-in-1), welcome guide, our worry-free 18-month warranty, and friendly customer service.
Are either of them about to explode?
Both stars are described in the cited material as late-stage stars expected eventually to become supernovae. “Eventually” is the crucial word. Stellar evolution operates on timescales that do not translate into a reliable human calendar date, and the sources do not predict an imminent explosion for either star.
Betelgeuse’s 2019 fading was caused by a surface mass-ejection event in NASA’s account. It was not presented as evidence that the star had begun an immediately impending supernova. Antares’s turbulent atmosphere likewise demonstrates active mass loss, not a countdown. A red supergiant can be unstable and lose material without astronomers being able to announce that its explosion is near.
What is the new Betelgeuse companion result?
In a 2026 announcement, ESO reported strong evidence that Betelgeuse has a faint companion estimated at roughly two to three solar masses. The announcement raises an important question: gravitational interaction with a companion could influence how the red supergiant has evolved or lost mass. However, ESO states that the companion’s effect on Betelgeuse’s evolution remains an open question.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsThis finding does not change the basic sky-location or size comparison, and it does not provide a new matched measurement for Antares. It is best understood as an additional piece of Betelgeuse’s history, not as proof that Betelgeuse is more unusual, larger or closer than Antares.
How the two research stories differ
| Star | What the cited observations emphasize | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Betelgeuse | Semiregular brightness cycles; the 2019 surface mass ejection; later recovery; evidence for a faint companion announced in 2026 | Shows a visibly changing, volatile star whose outer activity can affect its observed brightness and whose history may include a companion |
| Antares | VLTI maps of the surface and extended atmosphere, with unexpected turbulence | Shows that atmospheric gas motions and mass loss are complex rather than smoothly behaved |
These are complementary lines of investigation. A brightness record samples how much light reaches us over time; interferometric imaging and spectroscopy can probe where material is moving around the star. Comparing the headlines without comparing the measurement methods can make the stars seem more different—or more alike—than the evidence warrants.
A practical observing comparison
To find Betelgeuse
- Use a seasonal star chart or planisphere set for your date, time and location.
- Locate Orion’s recognizable pattern.
- Identify the orange-red star at the shoulder; that is Betelgeuse.
- Observe its color without assuming that color alone reveals its temperature, distance or size.
To find Antares
- Use the same kind of location-specific chart to determine when Scorpius is visible.
- Find the scorpion-shaped outline of Scorpius.
- Look for the prominent red-orange star in that constellation; that is Antares.
- Compare its appearance with Betelgeuse only as a visual exercise, not as a measurement of which star is intrinsically brighter or larger.
Both can be seen unaided under suitable conditions. Light pollution, haze, the Moon and the star’s altitude can change how strong its color appears, so a casual visual impression should not be treated as a scientific ranking.
Common misconceptions to avoid
- “They are both about 700 Suns wide, so they are exactly the same size.” The figures are rounded estimates from NASA and ESO, not a precision, same-method comparison.
- “Betelgeuse’s 15 solar masses versus Antares’s 12 proves Betelgeuse wins.” The estimates come from different source contexts and are approximate.
- “Antares has no variability because no cycle is listed.” The cited Antares release discusses atmospheric motion, not a direct variability-cycle analysis.
- “The 2019 dimming means Betelgeuse will explode soon.” NASA associates the dimming with a surface mass ejection and does not use it to predict an imminent supernova.
- “The distance is settled at one number.” NASA’s 2023 and 2024 materials give different rough Betelgeuse distances, and the consulted sources do not supply a matched Antares value.
- “A redder-looking star must be larger or closer.” Color, apparent brightness, distance and physical size are separate properties.
So, what is the real difference?
Betelgeuse and Antares are best distinguished by where they are and what astronomers have measured most clearly. Betelgeuse is Orion’s semiregularly variable red supergiant, with documented roughly 400-day and five-year cycles, a 2019 surface-ejection event and a newly reported possible companion. Antares is Scorpius’s red supergiant, whose extended atmosphere has been mapped with the VLTI and found to contain unexpected turbulence.
For size, the responsible answer is “roughly comparable in the cited rounded summaries,” not “one definitely wins.” For mass, NASA’s Betelgeuse estimate is about 15 Suns and ESO’s Antares estimate about 12, but they are not harmonized measurements. For temperature, only Betelgeuse has a numerical value in this source set. For distance and luminosity, the evidence does not support a matched winner. Both are destined, in the broad evolutionary sense, for eventual supernovae; neither source establishes that the event is imminent.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
