Adobe InDesign vs QuarkXPress

Adobe InDesign9.2Visit QQuarkXPress8.9Visit

Higher score Adobe InDesign #2 in Desktop Publishing Software 9.2/10 7-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Adobe InDesign

vs

Q QuarkXPress #3 in Desktop Publishing Software 8.9/10 Paid ✓ 0 of 5 features Visit QuarkXPress

• Adobe InDesign fits best

  Professional print-production workflows

• QuarkXPress fits best

  Mature print and digital publishing teams

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Adobe InDesign 9.2/10 Visit ↗	QQuarkXPress 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.2	8.9
Ranking	#2 in Desktop Publishing Software	#3 in Desktop Publishing Software
Best for	Professional print-production workflows	Mature print and digital publishing teams
Pricing model	Paid	Paid
Starting price	—	Not checked yet
Free plan	—	—
Free trial	7 days	—
Deployment	Desktop, Cloud	Desktop
Platforms	Windows, macOS	Windows, macOS
Support	Community, Docs · 24/7	Tickets, Community, Docs
Built for	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Adobe InDesign 0/5 · QuarkXPress 0/5
PDF export	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
EPUB export	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Master pages	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Preflight tools	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Color management	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Specs
Supported platforms	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Collaboration level	Not checked yet	Not checked yet
Our review
Pros	Strong multipage layout and typography tools Preflight checks and PDF import/export workflows Review links, Data Merge, and Adobe integrations	Supports books, magazines, newspapers, brochures and digital publications Exports to PDF, ePub and HTML5 from shared layouts Integrates with Word, Excel, Illustrator, Photoshop and IDML
Cons	No free plan Available on Windows and macOS only Broader creative tools require a different plan	No free plan or native mobile application Pricing requires choosing between subscription and perpetual licensing Real-time collaboration is listed, but collaboration workflows are not detailed
Our verdict	Adobe InDesign is a professional desktop-publishing application for designers, prepress and production professionals, print-service providers, publishers, agencies, and corporate design teams. It supports brochures, magazines, books,… Read the review →	QuarkXPress is desktop publishing and page-layout software for creative professionals producing print and digital content. It covers brochures, books, magazines, newspapers, interactive publications and e-books, with tools for typography,… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Adobe InDesign — where it wins

  • Strong multipage layout and typography tools
  • Preflight checks and PDF import/export workflows
  • Review links, Data Merge, and Adobe integrations

  Where it doesn't

  • No free plan
  • Available on Windows and macOS only
  • Broader creative tools require a different plan

• QuarkXPress — where it wins

  • Supports books, magazines, newspapers, brochures and digital publications
  • Exports to PDF, ePub and HTML5 from shared layouts
  • Integrates with Word, Excel, Illustrator, Photoshop and IDML

  Where it doesn't

  • No free plan or native mobile application
  • Pricing requires choosing between subscription and perpetual licensing
  • Real-time collaboration is listed, but collaboration workflows are not detailed

• Adobe InDesign9.2/10 · 7-day trial

  A focused choice for multipage layouts, typography, prepress, and PDF production.

  Visit Adobe InDesignFull verdict →
• QQuarkXPress8.9/10 · Paid

  A full-featured desktop publisher for teams producing print and digital content.

  Visit QuarkXPressFull verdict →