Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems2Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches3Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsiTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
The closest publicly traded alternatives to Blackstone Mortgage Trust (BXMT) are Starwood Property Trust (STWD), Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance (ARI), Ladder Capital (LADR) and Ares Commercial Real Estate (ACRE). They sit in the same mortgage/commercial-financing REIT universe, but they are not interchangeable: portfolios can differ in senior-loan concentration, transitional lending, owned real estate, geography, office exposure, leverage, funding structures and dividend policy. A broader screening list includes BRSP, FBRT, TRTX, KREF, CMTG, RC, NREF, REFI, SEVN, ACR and SUNS.
Use the list to build a comparison, not to assume that a larger company or a higher distribution is safer. BXMT’s own portfolio was $16.9 billion at June 30, 2026, after $1.2 billion of second-quarter repayments and $1.4 billion of new investments. Those changes show why a like-for-like date and metric set matters when you compare any mortgage REIT.
What BXMT exposure actually represents
Blackstone Mortgage Trust is a publicly traded commercial mortgage REIT focused on real-estate credit investments in North America, Europe and Australia. Its stated mandate is to originate, acquire and manage senior loans and other debt or credit-oriented investments collateralized by or related to commercial real estate. BXMT trades on the New York Stock Exchange and is a real-estate finance company rather than an owner of a conventional portfolio of apartment, warehouse or shopping-center properties.
That distinction matters. A mortgage REIT earns returns primarily from interest and fees on loans and other credit assets. The main risks are borrower credit quality, collateral values, refinancing, interest-rate moves, funding costs and the structure of leverage. An equity REIT, by contrast, normally receives rent from properties it owns. Someone seeking “commercial real-estate exposure” should first decide whether the desired exposure is to property cash flow, to lending spreads, or to a blend of debt and owned real estate.
#1 Best Overall
BXMT’s 2025 Form 10-K describes a senior-loan and credit-investment strategy across its three stated regions. The filing also provides the types of portfolio, geography, risk ratings, repayments and new investments that should form the basis of a peer comparison. Blackstone’s platform context in that filing cites $319.3 billion of investor capital under management as of December 31, 2025; that figure describes the broader platform context, not BXMT’s equity market value or loan portfolio.
Which listed companies belong in the BXMT alternative set?
Nareit’s REITWatch April 2026 table places BXMT and the following issuers in its mortgage/commercial-financing group:
| Company | Ticker | How to use it in a screen | What is established in the available material |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starwood Property Trust | STWD | Large listed mortgage/commercial-financing peer | Nareit places it in the same category and shows it as larger than BXMT in the table’s March 31, 2026 market-capitalization snapshot. |
| Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance | ARI | Direct commercial real-estate finance comparison | Nareit lists ARI in the same category; Apollo published a March 2026 investor presentation and fourth-quarter 2025 supplemental financial information. |
| Ladder Capital | LADR | Commercial-finance peer with a listed equity vehicle | Nareit includes LADR among mortgage/commercial-financing peers. |
| Ares Commercial Real Estate | ACRE | Loan-originating and investing comparison | Its investor-relations description says it primarily originates and invests in commercial real-estate loans and related investments and is externally managed by Ares Management. |
| BrightSpire Capital | BRSP | Additional mortgage-REIT screen candidate | Nareit includes it in the same mortgage/commercial-financing group; current portfolio details must be taken from its latest filing. |
| Franklin BSP Realty Trust | FBRT | Additional mortgage-REIT screen candidate | Nareit includes it in the same group; current mix and credit statistics are not stated in the material available here. |
| TPG RE Finance Trust | TRTX | Additional mortgage-REIT screen candidate | Nareit includes it in the same group; current mix and credit statistics are not stated in the material available here. |
| KKR Real Estate Finance Trust | KREF | Additional mortgage-REIT screen candidate | Nareit includes it in the same group; current mix and credit statistics are not stated in the material available here. |
| Claros Mortgage Trust | CMTG | Additional mortgage-REIT screen candidate | Nareit includes it in the same group; current mix and credit statistics are not stated in the material available here. |
| Ready Capital | RC | Broader commercial-financing comparison | Nareit includes it in the same group; current mix and credit statistics are not stated in the material available here. |
| NexPoint Real Estate Finance | NREF | Broader commercial-financing comparison | Nareit includes it in the same group; current mix and credit statistics are not stated in the material available here. |
| Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance | REFI | Broader real-estate finance comparison | Nareit includes it in the same group; current mix and credit statistics are not stated in the material available here. |
| Seven Hills Realty Trust | SEVN | Broader commercial-financing comparison | Nareit includes it in the same group; current mix and credit statistics are not stated in the material available here. |
| ACRES Commercial Realty | ACR | Broader commercial-financing comparison | Nareit includes it in the same group; current mix and credit statistics are not stated in the material available here. |
| Sunrise Realty Trust | SUNS | Broader commercial-financing comparison | Nareit includes it in the same group; current mix and credit statistics are not stated in the material available here. |
The Nareit ordering is a size snapshot based on market capitalization at March 31, 2026. It does not rank quality, expected return, dividend safety or balance-sheet resilience. A company can be larger yet have more concentrated loans, weaker credit performance or a different funding profile.
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minutePC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11The four closest starting points
Starwood Property Trust (STWD)
STWD is the clearest first comparison when scale and category membership are the starting criteria. Nareit places it in the same mortgage/commercial-financing group and shows a larger market capitalization than BXMT in its March 31, 2026 snapshot. That establishes size and classification only; it does not establish that STWD has lower leverage, better loans or a safer distribution.
Compare STWD with BXMT by separating its commercial mortgage book from any other business lines it reports. Review the percentage in senior loans, transitional loans, securities, owned real estate or other credit assets; then examine property type, region, office concentration, risk ratings, nonaccruals and upcoming maturities. A larger platform can provide broader funding access while still carrying material exposure to a stressed sector.
Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance (ARI)
ARI is another direct mortgage/commercial-financing peer in Nareit’s classification. Apollo’s March 2026 investor presentation and fourth-quarter 2025 supplemental financial information are useful starting documents for current portfolio, earnings and credit disclosures. Use the same reporting date as BXMT whenever possible rather than comparing a current ARI figure with an older BXMT snapshot.
Rank #2
For ARI, focus on the composition of commercial loans, geographic and property-type concentrations, loan-to-value bands, risk-rating migration, nonaccruals and the maturity schedule. Then connect those credit figures to its financing mix and dividend coverage. The name “commercial real-estate finance” does not by itself tell you whether two portfolios have similar duration or loss risk.
Recommended Free Tools
Ladder Capital (LADR)
LADR appears in Nareit’s mortgage/commercial-financing peer group and is a reasonable candidate for investors who want to compare a commercial-finance platform with a potentially different blend of lending and property-related assets. The relevant question is not whether its ticker appears beside BXMT’s; it is how much of its earnings comes from each asset category and how those assets are financed.
Read the latest LADR filing for the split among senior mortgage loans, transitional or bridge loans, securities, net-lease assets, owned real estate and other investments. Match those categories to debt maturities, secured versus unsecured funding, recourse, liquidity and the share of income available for distributions.
Ares Commercial Real Estate (ACRE)
ACRE’s investor-relations description says it primarily originates and invests in commercial real-estate loans and related investments and is externally managed by Ares Management. External management can affect incentive fees, cost structure, capital-allocation decisions and the alignment between shareholders and the manager, so it deserves a separate line in your comparison rather than being treated as a footnote.
Assess ACRE’s loan seniority, property sectors, regions, risk ratings, nonaccruals and financing terms against BXMT’s figures from the same quarter. Also read the management agreement and related-party disclosures in its filings. “Externally managed” describes governance and economics; it is not, by itself, evidence of better or worse investment performance.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
How to compare BXMT alternatives without being misled
1. Normalize the asset and loan mix
Start with a one-page asset map for every candidate. Record the balance and percentage in each category, using the issuer’s own definitions:
- Senior whole loans and senior mortgage loans.
- Transitional, bridge and construction loans.
- Mezzanine debt, preferred equity and other subordinate credit.
- Commercial mortgage-backed securities or other securities.
- Net-lease assets and directly owned real estate.
- Bank-loan portfolios or non-real-estate credit strategies.
Senior loans generally sit higher in the capital stack than subordinate positions, but “senior” does not eliminate loss risk. A senior loan secured by a weak property, high leverage or a difficult-to-refinance asset can still produce a loss. Conversely, two companies with similar senior-loan labels may have very different borrower quality and collateral.
2. Map geography and property sectors
Record exposure to the United States, the United Kingdom, continental Europe, Australia and any other reported region. Currency, interest-rate conventions, regulation and property-market conditions can change outcomes across regions. Then break out office, multifamily, industrial, hotel, retail, life-science, student housing and other sectors where disclosed.
Do not infer that a multinational lender has diversified risk simply because it operates in several countries. A portfolio can be geographically broad but concentrated in one property type or borrower cohort. Pay particular attention to office exposure, asset-level occupancy, valuation assumptions and loans approaching maturity.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREEClear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEScan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →3. Examine credit quality, not just the dividend
Collect the following measures for the same quarter or year-end:
- Weighted-average loan-to-value and the distribution of loans by LTV band.
- Risk ratings and loans that have been downgraded or placed on a watch list.
- Nonaccrual loans, criticized assets, delinquencies and troubled-debt modifications.
- Expected credit-loss reserves and charge-offs.
- Upcoming maturities, extensions, repayments and refinancing outcomes.
- Office and other stressed-sector concentration.
A reported nonaccrual is a lagging indicator. Pair it with maturity data and collateral values to identify loans that may require a workout before they stop paying. BXMT’s $1.2 billion of repayments and $1.4 billion of investments in Q2 2026 illustrate how quickly a reported portfolio can change; an older concentration table may no longer describe the current book.
4. Trace leverage and funding to the asset level
Mortgage REIT returns depend heavily on financing. Separate secured warehouse or repurchase facilities, commercial mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations, corporate debt, preferred capital and unrestricted cash. Note which borrowings are recourse, which are nonrecourse and which contain margin, borrowing-base or mark-to-market provisions.
Compare total debt with equity, but do not stop at a single leverage ratio. Review debt maturity walls, interest-rate hedges, unused borrowing capacity, covenant headroom and the availability of unencumbered assets. A company with less headline leverage can still face more near-term refinancing pressure if its debt maturities are concentrated.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →5. Test income and valuation on a consistent basis
Use the issuer’s defined distributable earnings, core earnings or similar measure, and reconcile it to GAAP net income where possible. Check whether the common dividend was covered during the period, whether coverage depended on one-time gains, and how sensitive net interest income is to changes in base rates and hedging costs.
For valuation, calculate price-to-book using the same reporting date and the same share count convention. A discount to book can signal market concern about asset marks, funding or governance; it can also reflect a temporary mismatch between reported carrying values and market prices. A premium is not proof of superior credit. Compare book-value changes, realized losses and reserve movements before drawing a conclusion.
6. Verify liquidity and investor access
All of the names in Nareit’s listed peer table are public securities, but trading liquidity and market capitalization differ. Confirm the exchange listing, average trading volume, bid-ask spread and availability through your brokerage account. A security that is technically listed may still be difficult to trade in size during market stress.
A practical comparison worksheet
Copy this structure into a spreadsheet and fill every issuer from its latest 10-K, 10-Q, earnings release and supplemental presentation. If a company does not disclose a metric, record “not stated” instead of estimating it.
| Category | BXMT reference point | What to collect for each alternative | Why it changes the decision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mandate | Senior loans and other real-estate credit investments | Loan, securities, owned-real-estate and other-asset definitions | Determines whether the security is actually a close credit substitute. |
| Portfolio size | $16.9 billion loan portfolio at June 30, 2026 | Loan portfolio and total investment balances at the same date | Shows scale, but not quality or safety. |
| Quarterly activity | $1.2 billion repayments and $1.4 billion investments in Q2 2026 | Repayments, originations, sales and payoffs | Reveals how rapidly composition is changing. |
| Geography | North America, Europe and Australia mandate | Country and region percentages | Captures currency, regulation and local property-market risk. |
| Property sectors | Current sector mix must be taken from the latest filing | Office, multifamily, industrial, hotel, retail and other shares | Identifies concentration and refinancing pressure. |
| Credit | Use BXMT’s latest ratings, LTV, nonaccrual and maturity disclosures | Equivalent metrics, definitions and period | Separates nominal yield from potential principal loss. |
| Funding | Use the latest balance-sheet and liquidity disclosures | Secured debt, CLOs, corporate debt, recourse, maturities and cash | Shows sensitivity to funding markets and margin calls. |
| Income | Use the latest reported distributable-earnings measure | Coverage, recurring versus nonrecurring items and rate sensitivity | Tests whether the distribution is supported by recurring earnings. |
| Valuation | Price-to-book must be calculated for a matched date | Share price, book value, dilution and reserve changes | Places the market’s discount or premium in context. |
| Governance | Review BXMT’s management and related-party disclosures | Internal or external management, fees and incentive terms | Explains how capital allocation and costs are determined. |
Step-by-step process for choosing an alternative
- Define the exposure. Decide whether you want senior commercial mortgages, higher-yield transitional credit, a blend of debt and owned real estate, or a broad real-estate-finance vehicle. Write the target in one sentence before looking at yields.
- Set a comparison date. Use the latest quarter for which every candidate has filed results. Do not mix BXMT’s June 30, 2026 portfolio with a peer’s earlier year-end data without labeling the mismatch.
- Build the asset map. Enter balances and percentages for each loan and asset category. Flag any company whose headline portfolio includes businesses that are not comparable to BXMT’s senior-loan focus.
- Mark concentration risks. Highlight office, hotel, construction, single-borrower, single-market and near-term-maturity concentrations. Set your own limits instead of assuming that an issuer’s “diversified” label meets your needs.
- Reconcile credit metrics. Read footnotes for risk-rating definitions, nonaccrual policy, LTV calculation and reserves. Similar terminology can conceal different measurement rules.
- Stress funding. List debt maturities for the next two years, secured facilities that can be resized, hedging costs and unrestricted liquidity. Consider what happens if property values fall and refinancing takes longer.
- Check distribution support. Compare recurring earnings with the common dividend and identify one-time gains, fee income or realized investment profits included in the coverage calculation.
- Review governance and fees. For externally managed companies such as ACRE, read the management agreement, incentive structure and related-party transactions. Apply the same governance check to every candidate.
- Confirm trading access. Verify the exchange, ticker, volume and your brokerage’s ability to purchase the security. Decide in advance how much liquidity you require for an exit.
- Recheck after earnings. Mortgage portfolios can change materially through repayments, originations, amendments and asset sales. Refresh the worksheet each quarter rather than treating a one-time ranking as permanent.
Common mistakes when replacing BXMT
Choosing the highest advertised yield
A high distribution can reflect a low share price, weak book value, elevated leverage or market expectations of a cut. Yield is an output of price and payout, not a standalone measure of credit quality. Start with loan performance and funding, then evaluate whether the distribution is covered.
Treating all mortgage REITs as the same
The Nareit category is a useful discovery tool, not a statement that the companies have identical assets or risks. Some may emphasize whole loans, others transitional credit, securities, owned real estate or specialized finance. Read the portfolio definition before comparing multiples.
Ignoring the maturity wall
Loans can remain current while becoming difficult to refinance. Pair payment status with maturity dates, extension options, sponsor equity and collateral valuation. A concentrated maturity schedule can matter more than a favorable current nonaccrual ratio.
Comparing book values from different dates
Interest rates, property marks, reserves, share issuance and repayments can move book value quickly. Use synchronized dates and document whether the figure is GAAP book value, tangible book value or another company-defined measure.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Assuming external management is automatically positive or negative
External management changes fee and incentive economics, but it does not determine portfolio quality by itself. Read the contract, related-party transactions, internalization provisions and actual expense burden.
Using the broader Blackstone platform figure as BXMT’s balance sheet
The $319.3 billion investor-capital figure cited in BXMT’s 2025 Form 10-K context belongs to the broader Blackstone platform as of December 31, 2025. It should not be substituted for BXMT’s $16.9 billion loan portfolio at June 30, 2026, its equity market capitalization or its liquidity.
How the alternatives fit different objectives
| Investor objective | Screening emphasis | Names to place on the first pass | Evidence still required |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closest category match to BXMT | Commercial mortgage and senior-loan share | STWD, ARI, LADR, ACRE | Current asset mix, geography, credit ratings and funding. |
| Larger listed platform | Market capitalization and trading liquidity | STWD, then other large names in the Nareit table | Size at the March 31, 2026 snapshot is not a safety ranking. |
| Manager-platform comparison | Management agreement, sourcing network and fees | ACRE and other externally managed candidates | Contract economics, related parties and recurring earnings. |
| Broader discovery universe | Sector, region and leverage diversification | BRSP, FBRT, TRTX, KREF, CMTG, RC, NREF, REFI, SEVN, ACR, SUNS | Latest filings are needed; the available material does not establish current metrics for these names. |
These groupings are a research order, not recommendations. An investor seeking property ownership and rent growth may find that none of the mortgage-REIT candidates matches the intended exposure; an investor seeking floating-rate commercial credit may prefer a loan-heavy vehicle but must accept borrower and funding risk. The correct alternative is the one whose asset and liability profile matches the objective after valuation and liquidity are considered.
Bottom line for a BXMT substitute
Begin with STWD, ARI, LADR and ACRE because they are explicitly identified as mortgage/commercial-financing peers and have enough public-company material to support a structured comparison. Expand to the other Nareit-listed names only after defining the asset mix, geography, credit limits and liquidity you require. Use BXMT’s June 30, 2026 figures as a dated benchmark, not a permanent description: its $16.9 billion loan portfolio changed through $1.2 billion of repayments and $1.4 billion of investments in one quarter. No peer should be labeled “best” or “safer” without matching-date evidence on loan quality, office concentration, maturities, leverage, funding and distribution coverage.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
