iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Automattic’s newly retained lawyers reportedly lost a request for additional time in the federal fight with WP Engine. That procedural setback did not end the case: the Northern District of California docket shows the litigation remained active in 2026, and a September 24, 2026 order addressed motions to dismiss.
The available case material does not identify the exact extension motion or reproduce the order denying it, so the “more time” detail should be confirmed against the docket. The better-established development is that WP Engine’s lawsuit, including its antitrust theories, continued past the pleading stage.
Did the judge let WP Engine’s lawsuit continue?
Yes. WP Engine said the September 24 ruling allowed most of its claims to proceed, including its antitrust claims. At this stage, the court was deciding whether the allegations were legally sufficient to move forward, not whether WP Engine had proved them.
Outdated Drivers Are Slowing You Down
One free scan finds every outdated or missing driver and matches the right update for your exact hardware.Free scan · exact hardware matchWindows Errors? Fix Them Before They Spread
Repair common Windows errors and clear accumulated junk for a smoother, more stable PC - no reinstall needed.Free scan · no reinstallWP Engine characterized the ruling as recognizing allegations of market power, anticompetitive conduct and harm extending beyond the company itself to competition across the market. Its statement said: “We are gratified by this important ruling allowing our antitrust claims to proceed, finding that we have sufficiently alleged market power, anticompetitive conduct, and market-wide harm to competition – not just harm to WP Engine.”
#1 Best Overall
That language describes WP Engine’s reading of the order. A pleading-stage decision is not a finding that Automattic violated antitrust law, interfered with WP Engine’s business or caused market-wide injury. Those issues would be tested through discovery, further motions and, if the case reaches it, trial.
What is the Automattic–WP Engine case about?
WP Engine filed WPEngine, Inc. v. Automattic Inc., case 4:24-cv-06917, in the Northern District of California on October 2, 2024. WP Engine says Automattic and Matt Mullenweg abused control over important WordPress resources and used that control in ways that harmed WP Engine, its customers and competition.
Automattic disputes that account and has asserted counterclaims of its own. In announcing those claims, Automattic accused WP Engine of trademark and broader ecosystem misconduct and raised issues involving the valuation of the Silver Lake-backed company. Automattic said, “This is not a fight Automattic sought out.”
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Neither side’s narrative is a court finding. The dispute combines competition claims with allegations involving trademarks, business interference and public statements, making the procedural posture especially important.
| Issue | WP Engine’s position | Automattic’s position | Current status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alleged conduct | Automattic used control over WordPress resources to disadvantage WP Engine and affect the wider hosting market. | WP Engine misused the WordPress ecosystem and engaged in conduct Automattic says supports its counterclaims. | Competing allegations; not adjudicated facts. |
| Legal theories | Antitrust and related claims concerning market power, anticompetitive conduct and interference. | Trademark and ecosystem-related counterclaims, along with allegations tied to WP Engine’s conduct and valuation. | Most of WP Engine’s claims, including antitrust claims according to WP Engine, survived the September 2026 pleading ruling. |
| Relief sought | Protection for the company, customers and WordPress community, with relief for alleged unlawful conduct. | Relief on Automattic’s counterclaims and a defense against WP Engine’s allegations. | No final judgment or trial result. |
What happened with discovery?
Discovery has been contentious. On June 5, 2026, Magistrate Judge Ajay Krishnan issued an order resolving several discovery disputes.
- The order granted limited additional deposition time on specified topics.
- It required particular document productions and interrogatory responses.
- It denied other requested productions.
- Compelled discovery was generally due by June 17, 2026.
This discovery order is separate from the September 24 order on motions to dismiss. The June ruling addressed what information and testimony the parties had to provide; the later ruling addressed whether claims could proceed based on the pleadings.
What did WP Engine add in its amended complaint?
A February 12, 2026 report described WP Engine’s third amended complaint. The reported allegations included possible plans to demand royalties from other hosting companies and pressure involving Stripe.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
Those points remain allegations in a party’s filing. Automattic said the amended complaint repackaged a narrative that the court had already rejected in substantial part. The competing descriptions have not been resolved by a final merits ruling.
Best Value
Why does the “more time” request matter?
A request by newly retained lawyers for additional time is a case-management issue, not a decision on who is right. Denial can require counsel to meet existing briefing or discovery schedules, potentially increasing pressure on a party that has just changed representation. It does not, by itself, establish that any claim is valid or invalid.
Because the specific motion and denial order were not identified in the available case material, readers should distinguish the reported extension dispute from the confirmed June discovery order and September motion-to-dismiss ruling. Those are different proceedings with different legal effects.
What happens next?
The case remains an active civil action. The September ruling means the surviving claims can continue into the next stages of litigation, while Automattic’s counterclaims remain part of the dispute. The June 17 compelled-discovery date has passed, but no later trial date or comprehensive schedule is established in the available material.
Likely next steps include continued document and deposition work, disputes over the scope or use of discovery, and further motions before any trial. The docket—not either company’s public statement—will determine which claims, defenses and deadlines ultimately control.
Quick Recap
What readers should take away
- The reported denial of extra time affected Automattic’s lawyers’ schedule, not the ultimate merits of the case.
- WP Engine’s lawsuit was not dismissed in full; WP Engine says its antitrust claims and most other claims survived the September 24, 2026 ruling.
- The June 5 discovery order and September 24 pleading ruling should not be conflated.
- Allegations about WordPress control, trademarks, royalties, Stripe and Silver Lake-related valuation remain contested.
- No trial verdict or final judgment has been entered.
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
