iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
The best alternative to a broad VPN connection is usually application-scoped access built on Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), with Secure Service Edge (SSE) or Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) services where their security and networking functions fit your environment. A VPN can still be appropriate for some legacy protocols and tightly controlled administrative paths, but connecting a device to a network does not by itself enforce least-privilege application access, prove device health, or prevent lateral movement. The right design starts with your applications, identities, devices, protocols, and management interfaces—not with a product label.
What can I use instead of a VPN to access private applications?
For users who need one or a few private data-center applications, use an access gateway or ZTNA deployment that authenticates the user, evaluates the device and session, and authorizes only the named application or service. The user reaches the application through a policy enforcement point instead of receiving a general route to a subnet.
For a broader modernization program, SSE can combine identity-aware access, security controls, and visibility delivered from service locations, while SASE combines those security functions with wide-area networking capabilities. These are categories and architectural approaches, not guarantees. Implementations differ in protocol support, segmentation, logging, identity integration, and where traffic is inspected.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Other controls may be needed alongside an application gateway:
#1 Best Overall
- POWERFUL SECURITY KEY: The YubiKey 5C NFC is the most versatile physical passkey, protecting your digital life from phishing attacks. It ensures only you can access your accounts
- WORKS WITH 1000+ ACCOUNTS: Compatible with popular accounts like Google, Microsoft, and Apple. A single YubiKey 5C NFC secures 100+ of your favorite accounts, including email, password managers, and more
- FAST & CONVENIENT LOGIN: Plug in your YubiKey 5C NFC via USB and tap it, or tap it against your phone (NFC), to authenticate. No batteries, no internet connection, and no extra fees required
- MOST SECURE PASSKEY: Supports FIDO2/WebAuthn, FIDO U2F, Yubico OTP, OATH-TOTP/HOTP, Smart card (PIV), and OpenPGP. That means it’s versatile, working almost anywhere you need it
- PRIMARY & SPARE KEYS: Just like having a spare house key, we recommend buying two YubiKeys - one for daily use and one as a spare. That way you’ll never get locked out of your accounts
- Bastion or jump hosts: a hardened intermediary for administrative protocols such as SSH or RDP.
- Network segmentation: separate tiers and management networks so an allowed session cannot freely reach unrelated systems.
- Private application proxies: publish a specific web application without exposing the underlying network.
- Device-aware remote access: require a managed, compliant endpoint before authorizing a sensitive service.
These options can be combined. A contractor might use ZTNA for a ticketing application, an administrator might use a bastion host for a database console, and a legacy engineering system might remain behind a restricted VPN while it is being redesigned.
Why organizations are moving beyond network-level VPN access
A traditional remote-access VPN normally creates an encrypted tunnel between a device and a gateway, then places the device on a virtual network or makes routes available to it. Encryption protects traffic in transit, but the tunnel’s scope and the gateway’s policies determine what the user can reach. If those policies are broad, a compromised account or endpoint can obtain more reachability than the person’s task requires.
CISA’s TIC 3.0 guidance highlights this distinction: a VPN-connected device may have access to resources available in the connected environment. The guidance recommends considering device compliance and protections such as segmentation or bastion hosts. It also identifies SASE and ZTNA as models that align connectivity more closely with application workflows.
The Tool Desk
Outbyte PC Repair FREERepair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Outbyte Driver Updater FREEFix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Zero Trust changes the basic decision. The network location is not treated as proof that a user or asset is trustworthy. Each request is evaluated using identity, device, application, and contextual policy, with reauthentication and reauthorization as conditions change. As the joint CISA, FBI, GCSB, CERT-NZ, and CCCS guidance published in June 2024 puts it: “ZT operates under the assumption that no user or asset should implicitly be trusted, requiring each user, device, and application to continually reauthenticate and reauthorize throughout the transaction.”
That does not make a ZTNA or SSE deployment automatically safe. A permissive policy, weak identity assurance, unmanaged endpoints, poor logging, or an unprotected management plane can preserve the original risk under a new name.
What the main alternatives mean
Zero Trust as a security principle
Zero Trust is an approach to making access decisions, not a single appliance or protocol. It rejects implicit trust based on being inside a corporate network, on using a particular IP range, or on having completed one login. A policy engine should evaluate the request, the resource, the user and workload identity, device state, authentication strength, and relevant session conditions. Policies can then grant, deny, or limit access and require additional verification.
Continuous evaluation is an operating model as much as a technical feature. A change in device compliance, identity risk, role, time, or resource sensitivity should be able to trigger reauthentication, reauthorization, session termination, or a narrower permission.
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA)
ZTNA is a remote-access approach that applies those decisions to particular applications or services. A connector or gateway in the data center makes an outbound or controlled connection to the service, while the user receives an application session rather than a general route to the network. Depending on the implementation, the user may open a browser application, a client using a private protocol, or an administrative session through a controlled gateway.
ZTNA is therefore not synonymous with “VPN with a different name.” A deployment should demonstrate that a user authorized for Application A cannot automatically scan or connect to Application B, and that policy decisions include the identity and device conditions the organization considers material.
Rank #2
- POWERFUL SECURITY KEY: The Security Key C NFC is the essential physical passkey for protecting your digital life from phishing attacks. It ensures only you can access your accounts.
- WORKS WITH 1000+ ACCOUNTS: Compatible with Google, Microsoft, and Apple. A single Security Key C NFC secures 100 of your favorite accounts, including email, password managers, and more.
- FAST & CONVENIENT LOGIN: Plug in your Security Key C NFC via USB-C and tap it, or tap it against your phone (NFC) to authenticate. No batteries, no internet connection, and no extra fees required.
- TRUSTED PASSKEY TECHNOLOGY: Uses the latest passkey standards (FIDO2/WebAuthn & FIDO U2F) but does not support One-Time Passwords. For complex needs, check out the YubiKey 5 Series.
- BUILT TO LAST: Made from tough, waterproof, and crush-resistant materials. Manufactured in Sweden and programmed in the USA with the highest security standards.
Secure Service Edge (SSE)
SSE describes a category of cloud-delivered security services that can include identity-aware access, secure web controls, cloud application security, data-loss controls, and traffic inspection. In a private data-center scenario, an SSE service may provide the policy enforcement and inspection point through which users reach private applications.
Because products grouped under SSE expose different functions and deployment models, verify where traffic terminates, how private connectors work, which protocols are supported, how logs are exported, and how policy changes are approved. SSE is not a replacement for local segmentation or secure server configuration.
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)
SASE combines security services associated with SSE and wide-area networking functions in a service-oriented architecture. It is useful when an organization wants a common policy and connectivity model for users, branches, cloud services, and data centers. SASE can reduce dependence on a hub-and-spoke network design, but the outcome depends on the selected functions, points of presence, identity integration, and the paths that must remain local.
Use SASE as an architectural category when defining requirements. Do not infer that every SASE offering provides identical application isolation, private-protocol support, or administrative controls.
Bastion hosts and privileged access gateways
A bastion host is a hardened intermediary that administrators use to reach servers or management tools. It can reduce direct exposure, centralize session recording, and provide a place to enforce MFA and administrative approvals. It does not automatically provide application-level policy for every user, and a compromised bastion or overly broad account can still create a large blast radius. Segment the bastion from ordinary user networks and restrict which targets and ports each administrator can use.
Segmentation and private application proxies
Segmentation separates workloads, environments, and management planes so that an allowed connection is not a license to move laterally. A private application proxy can publish a single internal web service while keeping its servers on private addresses. These controls are often complementary to ZTNA rather than competing alternatives: the proxy enforces the user-facing policy, while segmentation limits what an attacker can reach if a component is compromised.
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
VPN versus application-scoped access: the decisions that matter
The following table is an evaluation framework, not a claim that every product in a category behaves identically. Confirm each capability in the proposed deployment and test it with the protocols and identities your data center actually uses.
| Evaluation question | Broad VPN connection | ZTNA, SSE, or SASE approach | What to verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope of access | Often provides reachability to a virtual network, subnet, or routed environment after connection. | Can limit a session to named applications or services through a policy enforcement point. | Whether unauthorized discovery, port access, and resource-to-resource paths are blocked in practice. |
| Identity and device context | Usually depends on gateway authentication and whatever endpoint checks are configured. | Can combine identity, MFA, device compliance, role, resource, and session conditions for each request. | Which signals are required, how often they are reevaluated, and what happens when a device falls out of compliance. |
| Legacy and non-web workloads | Generally familiar to IP-based applications, but broad routes may be difficult to constrain. | May support web, client, RDP, SSH, or other protocols through specific connectors or gateways; support varies. | Protocol compatibility, latency, client behavior, file transfer, printing, and administrative tooling. |
| Segmentation and blast radius | Requires deliberate firewall rules, network zones, and endpoint controls to prevent lateral movement. | Application policy can reduce reachability, but segmentation remains necessary for workloads and infrastructure. | Whether a stolen session can scan, pivot, or reach management networks. |
| Management-plane exposure | The VPN gateway and administrative interfaces must be protected separately from user access. | A separate policy enforcement point can protect a management interface without exposing the interface itself. | Internet exposure, administrative paths, emergency access, logging, and break-glass controls. |
| Operational fit | May fit existing routing, firewalls, endpoint agents, and data-center operations. | May require identity, endpoint, DNS, connector, logging, and policy integration across sites and clouds. | Ownership, skills, change control, incident response, data residency, and failure behavior. |
Is ZTNA safer than a VPN for data-center access?
ZTNA can reduce unnecessary reachability and improve the granularity of access decisions, but “safer” is a deployment-specific conclusion. A narrowly scoped, well-monitored ZTNA policy can have a smaller blast radius than a VPN profile that routes an entire subnet. Conversely, a ZTNA policy that grants every user a broad group of applications, accepts weak authentication, or leaves administrative interfaces exposed may not provide the intended improvement.
Compare the two designs using concrete attack paths:
Rank #3
- POWERFUL SECURITY KEY: The YubiKey 5 NFC is the most versatile physical passkey, protecting your digital life from phishing attacks. It ensures only you can access your accounts
- WORKS WITH 1000+ ACCOUNTS: Compatible with popular accounts like Google, Microsoft, and Apple. A single YubiKey 5 NFC secures 100+ of your favorite accounts, including email, password managers, and more
- FAST & CONVENIENT LOGIN: Plug in your YubiKey 5 NFC via USB and tap it, or tap it against your phone (NFC), to authenticate. No batteries, no internet connection, and no extra fees required
- MOST SECURE PASSKEY: Supports FIDO2/WebAuthn, FIDO U2F, Yubico OTP, OATH-TOTP/HOTP, Smart card (PIV), and OpenPGP. That means it’s versatile, working almost anywhere you need it
- PRIMARY & SPARE KEYS: Just like having a spare house key, we recommend buying two YubiKeys - one for daily use and one as a spare. That way you’ll never get locked out of your accounts
- Can a user authorized for one application enumerate other internal hosts?
- Can a stolen session continue after the endpoint loses compliance?
- Does an administrator have a separate path to the management plane?
- Are logs detailed enough to connect an identity, device, request, resource, and action?
- Can incident responders revoke one session or application entitlement without disconnecting every user?
Document the answers, test them with a pilot, and retain network controls that the application policy does not cover.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors2Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute3Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsHow to give contractors access to one internal application
- Inventory the application path. Record the application URL or client, supporting services, ports, dependencies, data sensitivity, user roles, and whether the contractor needs read-only or write access. Do not assume that the visible web front end is the only required service.
- Create a separate external identity population. Use named accounts, an explicit sponsor or owner, an expiration date, and a role that contains only the required application entitlement. Avoid shared credentials.
- Require strong authentication. Enforce MFA for remote access. CISA recommends stronger, phishing-resistant methods where possible. A hardware security key can be one possible factor if it is compatible with the organization’s identity provider and user workflow; it does not replace application policy, segmentation, or a gateway.
- Set device conditions. Decide whether a managed device, supported operating-system version, encryption, endpoint protection, or a minimum compliance state is required. If contractors cannot meet the condition, provide a controlled alternative such as a managed virtual desktop or bastion rather than silently waiving the check.
- Publish only the application. Configure the gateway or ZTNA connector to expose the named service, not a subnet. Deny discovery and direct connections to unrelated hosts. Keep the application servers on private addresses.
- Limit the session. Apply time limits, idle timeouts, download or copy restrictions where appropriate, and reauthorization when risk or device state changes. Preserve the application’s own authorization checks.
- Log and review use. Send authentication, policy decisions, device state, session, and application events to the organization’s monitoring system. Assign an owner to review contractor access and remove it when the engagement ends.
This pattern can still require segmentation behind the connector. If the application server can reach a database, directory, or management network without restrictions, an application-scoped front door does not eliminate that internal attack path.
How to secure RDP if you stop using a VPN
RDP needs separate treatment because it is a privileged, non-browser protocol that is frequently targeted. CISA’s countermeasure advises disabling RDP where possible. If it is required, the guidance describes access through a secure VPN after MFA or through a zero-trust remote-access gateway.
Preferred control sequence
- Remove unnecessary RDP. Disable the service, firewall rules, and associated accounts where the workload can be administered another way.
- Keep RDP off the public internet. Do not publish the RDP listener directly. Place it behind a bastion, privileged-access gateway, or ZTNA-capable remote-access gateway that acts as the policy enforcement point.
- Require MFA before the session. Use phishing-resistant authentication where the identity platform and workflow support it. MFA should be required for remote and privileged access, not treated as an optional add-on.
- Constrain targets and roles. Give each administrator access only to the servers and functions required for the job. Use separate admin identities and restrict east-west paths with firewall rules and network zones.
- Check the endpoint. Require an approved, compliant device or use a controlled administrative workstation. Record device and session context with the identity event.
- Monitor and expire access. Record logons, target systems, session duration, privilege changes, and file or clipboard controls where available. Use just-in-time or time-bound approvals for exceptional access.
A zero-trust gateway is not automatically safer than a VPN for RDP. Validate that it handles the required RDP features, does not expose a bypass path, and can terminate access when the user’s role, device state, or approval changes.
Protect internet-exposed management interfaces separately
Management interfaces include hypervisor consoles, storage systems, firewalls, remote-management controllers, orchestration panels, and administrative web applications. They deserve a dedicated design even when ordinary user applications are moved to ZTNA.
CISA’s Binding Operational Directive 23-02 applies to federal civilian agencies and directs agencies to remove internet exposure or protect interfaces with Zero Trust capabilities that use a policy enforcement point separate from the interface. The principle is broadly useful: do not place the management interface itself on the public internet and assume its login page is sufficient protection.
- Place administration on a dedicated management network or isolated access plane.
- Use a separate bastion or policy enforcement point rather than installing the control directly on the interface.
- Require MFA, separate administrator identities, and device or workstation controls.
- Restrict source paths, target systems, ports, and time windows.
- Forward access and configuration-change logs to monitoring that is independent of the managed system.
- Maintain a tested break-glass procedure that is protected, audited, and not left permanently exposed.
Do you still need MFA with ZTNA?
Yes. ZTNA uses identity to make a policy decision; MFA strengthens the evidence for that identity. CISA advises requiring MFA for remote and privileged access and recommends stronger, phishing-resistant methods. MFA does not compensate for a policy that grants excessive application access, an unmanaged endpoint, missing segmentation, or an exposed management interface.
Define the authentication requirement by risk. A low-sensitivity internal reference application may use the organization’s standard MFA policy, while an administrative gateway may require a phishing-resistant factor, a managed device, a separate administrator account, and an approval. Ensure the gateway, identity provider, application, and emergency access process agree on session lifetime and revocation.
A practical migration plan from VPN access
1. Inventory people, resources, and protocols
List data-center applications, owners, user groups, administrators, vendors, service accounts, third-party paths, dependencies, and protocols. Distinguish ordinary business use from infrastructure administration. Include DNS, directory, database, file transfer, monitoring, backup, and deployment dependencies; an application that looks web-based may still require several internal services.
Recommended Free Tools
Rank #4
- POWERFUL SECURITY KEY: The Security Key NFC is the essential physical passkey for protecting your digital life from phishing attacks. It ensures only you can access your accounts.
- WORKS WITH 1000+ ACCOUNTS: Compatible with Google, Microsoft, and Apple. A single Security Key NFC secures 100 of your favorite accounts, including email, password managers, and more.
- FAST & CONVENIENT LOGIN: Plug in your Security Key NFC via USB-A and tap it, or tap it against your phone (NFC) to authenticate. No batteries, no internet connection, and no extra fees required.
- TRUSTED PASSKEY TECHNOLOGY: Uses the latest passkey standards (FIDO2/WebAuthn & FIDO U2F) but does not support One-Time Passwords. For complex needs, check out the YubiKey 5 Series.
- BUILT TO LAST: Made from tough, waterproof, and crush-resistant materials. Manufactured in Sweden and programmed in the USA with the highest security standards.
2. Classify each access path
Mark which resources can be delivered through per-application policy, which need a bastion or privileged gateway, and which legacy workloads still require network-level connectivity. Record the sensitivity of the data and the consequence of a compromised account or endpoint. This produces a staged transition rather than a promise to eliminate every VPN tunnel immediately.
3. Define controls before comparing implementations
Write requirements for identity federation, MFA, device compliance, authorization granularity, protocol support, segmentation, logging, session control, availability, data handling, and incident response. Specify what must happen when the identity provider is unavailable, a connector loses contact, or a device becomes noncompliant. Product names should be evaluated against this list, not used as a substitute for it.
4. Isolate and protect management access
Remove unnecessary internet exposure. For federal civilian agencies covered by BOD 23-02, follow the directive’s requirement to remove exposure or use a separate policy enforcement point with Zero Trust capabilities. For other organizations, apply the same risk-based separation and document exceptions.
5. Pilot a narrow, representative set
Choose a small group of applications that includes a normal user workflow, a contractor workflow, and at least one legacy or administrative path. Test sign-in, authorization, device failure, session revocation, logging, help-desk recovery, connector failure, and the application’s real client behavior. A pilot is an implementation step, not evidence that every workload will behave the same way.
6. Measure outcomes that matter
- Number of applications and ports reachable from each role.
- Percentage of remote and privileged sessions using the required MFA and device state.
- Time to revoke a user’s application access or terminate a session.
- Completeness and searchability of identity, device, policy, and application logs.
- Number of legacy exceptions and the compensating controls attached to each.
- User and administrator recovery time when identity, connector, or policy services fail.
7. Migrate in stages and retire broad routes deliberately
Move one application group at a time, review the logs and incident procedures, and narrow the corresponding VPN profile. Keep a documented rollback path while users and support teams learn the new workflow. Remove a broad route only after confirming that required dependencies, emergency access, and monitoring are covered by the new design.
Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Common failure modes and fixes
“We deployed ZTNA, so segmentation is no longer needed.”
Why it fails: The connector, application server, or service account may still have broad network reachability.
Fix: Use network zones and firewall rules to restrict workload-to-workload paths, then test lateral movement from an authorized session and from a compromised connector scenario.
“MFA is enabled, so any internal route is acceptable.”
Why it fails: MFA verifies an authentication event; it does not define which applications the account can reach or whether the endpoint is trustworthy.
Crashes, No Sound, or Screen Glitches?
Random freezes, missing sound and display glitches usually trace back to one bad driver. Find and replace yours safely.Free scan · under a minutePC Slower Than It Used to Be?
A free scan shows the junk files, broken settings and background clutter dragging Windows down - then fixes them in one click.Free scan · Windows 10 & 11Fix: Pair MFA with named-resource authorization, device requirements, least privilege, and session revocation.
Best Value
- FIDO2 & Passkey Ready: Business-ready and FIDO2 L1 certified. This key is supported by major management suites and is ideal for both individual and enterprise deployment. Works seamlessly with Gmail, Facebook, GitHub, Dropbox, Coinbase, and more.
- Universal Connectivity (USB-A ): Features a built-in USB-A connector—simply unfold the key and plug it into your compatible PC or laptop for seamless authentication on the go.
- Dedicated Manager App: Use the Thetis Manager App for the initial hardware PIN setup. Setting the PIN on the device first ensures a smooth registration process. Once the PIN is configured, you can begin registering the key across your favorite FIDO2-compatible online services.
- Ultra-Durable & Portable: Featuring a rotating metal cover, this key is water, crush, and tamper-resistant. It fits easily on a keychain and requires no batteries or network connectivity.
- Check FIDO2 compatibility before purchase - Known limitations: ID Austria is not supported (requires FIDO2 Level 2). Windows Hello login only works with Windows Enterprise editions that support Entra ID, and NFC is NOT supported.
“Every application can be placed behind one browser proxy.”
Why it fails: RDP, SSH, thick clients, databases, file services, and operational tools may need protocol-specific gateways or a staged transition.
Fix: Test each protocol and dependency. Use a bastion, privileged gateway, or narrowly scoped VPN for workloads that cannot yet use the preferred access pattern.
“The management interface is protected because it has a login page.”
Why it fails: Internet exposure increases attack surface and may bypass the organization’s intended policy enforcement and monitoring.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Fix: Remove exposure or place a separate enforcement point in front of the interface, with MFA, device controls, segmentation, and independent logging.
“A category label proves the service will fit.”
Why it fails: SSE, SASE, and ZTNA offerings differ in private connectivity, protocol support, policy detail, inspection, logging, and failure behavior.
Fix: Use a requirements matrix, obtain architecture and data-flow documentation, and validate the workflows in a controlled pilot.
How to choose among ZTNA, SSE, SASE, and a controlled VPN
| Situation | Starting point | Controls that still matter |
|---|---|---|
| One or a few web applications for employees or contractors | Application proxy or ZTNA with identity and device policy. | Application authorization, MFA, session controls, logging, and server-side segmentation. |
| Mixed private applications across data centers, clouds, and branches | SSE or SASE capabilities evaluated against the organization’s network and identity posture. | Connector placement, routing, data handling, local firewalls, availability, and protocol testing. |
| Privileged administration and RDP | Bastion or privileged remote-access gateway; disable RDP where possible. | MFA, managed admin workstations, target allowlists, approvals, session recording where appropriate, and isolated management networks. |
| Legacy systems that cannot yet use application policy | Restricted VPN or protocol-specific gateway as a transitional control. | Device compliance, narrow routes, segmentation, time limits, monitoring, and a modernization owner. |
| Internet-exposed management interfaces | Remove exposure or place a separate Zero Trust policy enforcement point in front of the interface. | Dedicated management network, MFA, independent logs, emergency access, and strict administrator roles. |
CISA’s joint guidance emphasizes that the effectiveness of a modern solution depends on an organization’s network and infrastructure posture. Assess that posture—identity maturity, endpoint coverage, segmentation, application architecture, operations, and incident response—before selecting an approach. No category is universally superior, and none removes the need to secure the applications and systems behind the access layer.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
Questions to answer before replacing a VPN
- Which users, service accounts, vendors, and administrators need access, and for what exact task?
- Which named applications and protocols are required, including non-web and legacy workloads?
- What device state and MFA strength are mandatory for each risk tier?
- Where will policy be enforced, and can it be separated from the management interface?
- What prevents an authorized session from discovering or reaching unrelated resources?
- Which logs prove who accessed what, from which device, under which policy, and for how long?
- How will access be revoked during an incident or when a contractor’s engagement ends?
- What is the fallback when the identity provider, gateway, connector, or network service is unavailable?
- Which VPN exceptions will remain, who owns them, and what compensating controls limit their risk?
Bottom line for private data-center access
Use application-scoped access when the task is application-scoped. ZTNA is the most direct model for granting a user access to a named private service without automatically placing the device on a broad network. SSE and SASE can extend that model across users, branches, clouds, and data centers, but their effectiveness depends on the specific implementation and your existing posture. Keep a tightly controlled VPN, bastion, or privileged gateway for legacy and administrative protocols where necessary, and protect management interfaces as a separate priority. MFA, device compliance, segmentation, logging, and least privilege remain essential whichever access method you choose.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
