Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

In 2017, Netflix described a way to find API requests that could overload services behind a microservice gateway: look for expensive work in backend services, then trace it back to the user-facing call that triggered it. The risk is amplification—a seemingly ordinary request can cause many downstream operations—so the incoming request count alone may not reveal the danger.

How one API request can amplify into an internal denial of service

A gateway may receive one request and call multiple middle-tier services, which can in turn contact backend systems. If a particular request triggers unusually costly or extensive work, the internal load can be far greater than the traffic visible at the edge. Under attack, carefully chosen requests could therefore exhaust resources without the attacker needing to send a huge volume of traffic.

SecurityWeek’s August 1, 2017 report attributed this description to Netflix security engineers Scott Behrens and Bryan Payne: “All of this is made possible because the microservice architecture helps the attacker by massively amplifying the attack against internal systems. In summary, a single request in a microservices architecture may generate tens of thousands of complex middle tier and backend service calls.” The quotation is attributed as SecurityWeek reported it.

How to find APIs that trigger expensive backend work

The central diagnostic task is linking downstream resource use to the API request that initiated it. InfoQ’s July 29, 2017 technical summary recommended inspecting backend request times rather than relying only on front-tier observations, then working backward to candidate API calls.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
#1 Best Overall
FortiGate-40F Firewall Appliance - 5 Gigabit Ethernet RJ45 Ports, Ideal for Small Businesses (Appliance Only, No Subscription) (FG-40F)
  • Compact and Efficient Design: The FortiGate 40F is designed for small to mid-sized businesses and enterprise branch offices, featuring a compact, fanless desktop form factor that ensures quiet operation and minimizes space usage.
  • Robust Connectivity Options: Equipped with 5 GE RJ45 ports, including 1 WAN port and 4 internal ports, this model provides essential connectivity and flexibility for various network configurations in a small-scale environment.
  • High-Performance Security: Offers up to 1 Gbps IPS throughput and 600 Mbps threat protection throughput, using Fortinet’s purpose-built security processor technology to deliver industry-leading performance and protection for SSL encrypted traffic.
  • Advanced Threat Protection: Integrated with Fortinet’s AI-powered FortiGuard Labs, the FortiGate 40F offers comprehensive cybersecurity, identifying and mitigating both known and unknown threats to maintain robust security across your network.
  • Simplified Management and Deployment: Features a user-friendly management console that provides comprehensive network automation and visibility, coupled with Zero Touch Integration with Fortinet’s Security Fabric for easy deployment.
  1. Observe backend behavior. Identify services or operations with rising request times, latency, errors, or other signs of strain.
  2. Trace the work upstream. Determine which user-facing API calls could have caused the expensive backend activity.
  3. Vary request parameters. Test how inputs affect the amount of work. InfoQ gave a search-range parameter as an example: a broader range may cause more backend processing.
  4. Watch for cost signals. Increased latency, rate-limit errors, and exceptions can help indicate that a request has become expensive.

This method looks for disproportionate downstream work, not simply high request volume. Backend observations help reveal the cost; tracing connects that cost to a request that can be investigated.

What Netflix’s 2017 testing tools did

The reported tools served different purposes: identifying a risky call is not the same as testing how a system responds after a candidate has been found.

Rank #2
FortiGate-60F Network Security Appliance Plus 1 Year FortiGuard Unified Threat Protection (UTP) and FortiCare Premium (FG-60F-BDL-950-12)
  • HARDWARE PLUS SECURITY SERVICES: FortiGate-60F Firewall Appliance bundled with 1 year of FortiCare Premium and FortiGuard Unified Threat Protection.
  • UNIFIED THREAT PROTECTION (UTP): Secures against advanced online threats with comprehensive web filtering and anti-botnet technologies.
  • OPTIMIZED FOR MEDIUM-SIZED BUSINESSES: Tailored for businesses needing robust security without the infrastructure of larger enterprises.
  • RELIABLE CUSTOMER SUPPORT: FortiCare Premium ensures high-quality support and service continuity.
  • EFFECTIVE PROTECTION: Employs advanced filtering technologies to safeguard against sophisticated threats.
Tool Reported role in 2017 What it does not establish
Repulsive Grizzly An application-layer DDoS testing framework used to trigger tests against a system under test after candidate calls had been identified. SecurityWeek and InfoQ describe this role. The reports do not establish that it finds risky APIs by itself, remains maintained, or is compatible with current systems.
Cloud Kraken / “Cloudy Kraken” A tool for coordinating larger, cross-region testing. SecurityWeek calls it Cloud Kraken; InfoQ uses “Cloudy Kraken.” The 2017 reports do not establish current maintenance or compatibility.

WIRED’s July 28, 2017 account said Netflix tested the scenario during a “Chaos Kong,” rerouting traffic away from a production region so engineers could experiment in a real-world environment while service continued through other regions. WIRED cautioned that the released tools were not production-grade protections in themselves: they made testing more accessible after potential weaknesses had been identified.

How to reduce the risk

The recommendations reported at the time focused on bounding the work a request can trigger, containing failures, and making backend conditions visible to edge defenses.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.
Rank #3
GL.iNet GL-MT5000 Brume 3 Wired VPN Security Gateway NO Wi-Fi
  • 【Up to 1100 Mbps VPN Speed 】 Hardware-accelerated WireGuard and OpenVPN-DCO deliver up to 1100 Mbps VPN throughput, over 3× faster than Brume 2 for smooth remote access and file transfers.
  • 【Three 2.5G Ports & Multi-WAN】Tri-port 2.5GbE design with flexible WAN LAN configuration supports multi-gigabit wired setups, dual-ISP Multi-WAN and failover to keep home and SOHO networks online.
  • 【Stealth VPN Obfuscation】VPN obfuscation disguises VPN traffic as regular HTTPS, helping you evade blocking, bypass restrictive networks and maintain stable, private connections.
  • 【DPI protection】Deep Packet Inspection with visual dashboards blocks adult/gambling/malicious sites, while SQM and QoS prioritize gaming, calls, and video when bandwidth is tight
  • 【OpenWrt & USB 3.0 Expansion】OpenWrt with 1GB DDR4 and 8GB eMMC lets you install plugins and build VPN, ad-blocking or NAS, while USB 3.0 Type‑C connects high-speed storage or 4G/5G dongles
  • Reduce service dependencies. Design services so a failing dependency can fail in isolation rather than causing a cascade.
  • Bound request work. Understand queues and request processing, and limit batch sizes or the number of objects a caller can request.
  • Use resilience controls. Apply timeouts and circuit breakers in clients so stalled or failing downstream services do not consume resources indefinitely.
  • Improve backend visibility. Monitor middle-tier and backend resource use, along with cache misses that may signal a cache configuration problem.
  • Feed downstream signals to edge controls. InfoQ described giving a WAF feedback about backend resource utilization that is not visible from the edge alone.
  • Prioritize legitimate traffic. WIRED emphasized distinguishing legitimate customer requests from malicious traffic so real requests can be prioritized.

These are defensive practices reported in 2017, not guarantees that any individual control prevents application-layer DDoS. Their value depends on how they are implemented and on the architecture being protected.

Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

What the historical attack statistic does—and does not—say

SecurityWeek attributed a figure of “less than one percent” to Akamai’s first-quarter 2017 State of the Internet report, describing application-layer attacks as a share of DDoS attacks. It is a historical statistic reported in 2017, not a current estimate of attack prevalence. The figures here do not establish how common application-layer attacks are today.

Rank #4
Ubiquiti Cloud Gateway Ultra (UCG-Ultra)
  • Runs UniFi Network for full-stack network management
  • Manages 30+ UniFi Network devices and 300+ clients
  • 1 Gbps routing with IDS/IPS
  • Multi-WAN load balancing
  • 0.96" LCM status display

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.