iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Small, repeatable habits can help you write, review, and maintain software more effectively. The biggest gains come from shortening feedback loops: make changes in manageable pieces, test them early, and use what you learn to improve the next change. These practices do not promise instant improvement, but they make progress easier to see and sustain.
1. Keep changes small and integrate them regularly
A large change can hide defects and become harder to review as it grows. Smaller, self-contained changes are easier to understand and give you earlier chances to discover problems. DORA describes continuous integration as regularly integrating work into the main codebase, supported by automated builds and tests. See DORA’s continuous integration guidance.
Put it into practice
- Break a feature into steps that each make a coherent, reviewable improvement.
- Integrate those steps regularly using your team’s normal workflow and safeguards.
- When working alone, keep changes small enough to inspect and validate before moving on.
Frequent integration can reduce the time branches drift apart; it does not remove the need for sound review and testing.
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
2. Treat code review as a learning loop
Review is an opportunity to improve a change and build shared understanding. Google’s engineering guidance addresses both authors and reviewers, including how to prepare changes and assess them. Reviewers can consider correctness, design, readability, tests, and maintainability; authors can make that work easier by keeping changes focused. See Google’s Engineering Practices.
Make feedback specific and constructive
- Explain the concern and its effect, rather than leaving a vague objection.
- Distinguish a correctness or maintainability issue from a personal style preference.
- As an author, ask questions when a comment is unclear and apply feedback that improves the change.
Review can strengthen a particular contribution and help teammates learn from one another, but review by itself is not a guarantee of quality.
3. Test early, not just at the end
Run relevant checks while you are still implementing a change. A fast, reliable automated test suite can reveal a regression when the code is fresh in your mind, making the cause easier to investigate. DORA recommends continuous testing and emphasizes fast, reliable automated feedback. Its test automation guidance describes how automated suites fit into that practice.
Use the right checks for the change
- Run focused tests as you work, then run the broader checks required by your project before integration.
- When a check fails, investigate the failure promptly rather than assuming it is unrelated.
- Use exploratory, usability, and acceptance testing where they are needed; automation complements these forms of evaluation rather than replacing all of them.
A test suite is most useful when developers can trust its results and receive them quickly.
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minute2Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errors3Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches4. Turn feedback and failures into one deliberate improvement
Code review comments, test failures, and feedback from users or production can point to a recurring gap. Instead of treating each issue as an isolated interruption, look for a pattern and choose one practical adjustment for the next change. For example, repeated review comments about unclear edge cases may be a reason to write down those cases before implementation.
Rank #3
This is a way to act on feedback loops, not a separately measured formula for individual improvement. The useful habit is to connect an outcome to a specific next step, then see whether that step helps.
5. Document the context future work depends on
Documentation helps when it preserves information someone will need to understand, operate, or change the software. DORA’s Core Model includes documentation quality and code maintainability among its practice capabilities; see DORA’s research and Core Model.
Capture information that is hard to rediscover
- Record setup steps that are not obvious from the project itself.
- Explain non-obvious behavior or constraints that affect how a component is used.
- Note important decisions and the reasons behind them when that context will guide future changes.
Useful documentation is selective. Comments on every line are not a substitute for clear code or a concise explanation of the context maintainers need.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Clear out junk files and repair common Windows errorsFree Scan →Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →How to start without turning habits into busywork
Choose one change in your next task: split it into smaller steps, run a relevant test before the end, or write down a decision a teammate would otherwise have to rediscover. Keep using the practice that addresses a real source of friction in your work. Team collaboration makes regular integration and review especially valuable, while testing, deliberate learning, and useful documentation can also help solo developers.
Best Value
DORA’s guidance concerns engineering practices and team capabilities; it does not establish a universal ranking of these habits or promise that any one practice will immediately improve every developer. The right mix depends on the work and the feedback available.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
