Head-to-head · Manufacturing Software
ECI Deacom vs MRPeasy
ECI Deacom leads on 0 checks, MRPeasy on 1, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreMRPeasy · 5.8/10
- Most featuresMRPeasy · 1 of 5
Our editors rank ECI Deacom at #9 and MRPeasy at #12 for manufacturing software; ECI Deacom has no rubric score yet (facts researched, not yet scored), so the checks below decide.
MRPeasy offers production scheduling; ECI Deacom doesn't publish it.
ECI Deacom is the better fit for batch manufacturers needing integrated ERP workflows. MRPeasy is the better fit for small manufacturers needing priced MRP.
- ECI Deacom fits best
Batch manufacturers needing integrated ERP workflows
- MRPeasy fits best
Small manufacturers needing priced MRP
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | ECI Deacom —/10 Visit ↗ | MRPeasy 5.8/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | — | 5.8 |
| Ranking | #9 in Manufacturing Software | #12 in Manufacturing Software |
| Best for | Batch manufacturers needing integrated ERP workflows | Small manufacturers needing priced MRP |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Not published | $49/user/mo |
| Free plan | Not published | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted | Cloud, Mobile |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Support | Docs | Tickets, Docs |
| Compliance | SOC 2 | ISO 27001, 2FA |
| Integrations | 2 integrations | 20 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market |
| Features ECI Deacom 0/5 · MRPeasy 1/5 | ||
| Materials planning (MRP) | Not published | Not published |
| Production scheduling | Not published | ✓ (best) |
| Shop-floor tracking | Not published | Not published |
| Quality management | Not published | Not published |
| Mobile access | Not published | Not published |
| Specs | ||
| Deployment | Both | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | ECI Deacom is an ERP for batch and process manufacturers in food and beverage, chemicals, health and beauty, pharmaceuticals, and nutraceuticals. It brings production planning, batch execution, material requirements planning, scheduling,… Read the review → |
MRPeasy is cloud-based manufacturing resource planning and ERP software for small manufacturers and distributors, with a stated fit for organizations of approximately 10–200 employees. It combines multi-level bills of materials, inventory,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
ECI Deacom — where it wins
- Batch planning, execution, MRP, and scheduling in one system
- Lot tracking, shelf-life controls, quality checkpoints, and traceability
- Financials plus multi-company and multi-facility management
Where it doesn't
- Public pricing is not provided; buyers must contact sales
- The published pricing page states a minimum of five concurrent users
- Named integrations are Avalara AvaTax and NET1
MRPeasy — where it wins
- Multi-level BOMs, MRP, procurement forecasting, and capacity scheduling
- Mobile shop-floor reporting with inventory, lot, serial, and expiry tracking
- Integrations across accounting, ecommerce, CRM, shipping, and automation services
Where it doesn't
- No free plan; paid access starts at $49 per user monthly
- Quality control, serial numbers, and subcontracting require Professional
- API, webhooks, and unlimited limits require the Unlimited plan
- ECI Deacom—/10 · Pricing on request
Deacom combines batch manufacturing control, traceability, quality, inventory, and finance in one ERP.
Visit ECI DeacomFull verdict → - MRPeasy5.8/10 · From $49/user/mo · 30-day trial
A capable cloud MRP suite with scheduling, inventory, purchasing, and shop-floor tools.
Visit MRPeasyFull verdict →
All manufacturing software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026